Divergent effects of short-term and continuous anthropogenic noise exposure on Western Bluebird parental care behavior
Sensory environments are rapidly changing due to increased human activity in urban and non-urban areas alike. For instance, natural and anthropogenic sounds can interfere with parent-offspring communication and mask cues reflective of predation risk, resulting in elevated vigilance at the cost of provisioning.
In the Press
Study finds opposing effects of short-term and continuous noise on western bluebird parental care
Phys.org
.
“We were surprised to see that changes in Western Bluebird parental care were so different for birds exposed to noise pollution for just over an hour compared to birds living with it long term. The difference really highlights how complex responses to this pollutant can be and that short-term experiments might not adequately reflect how animals respond to this pollutant in the wild.”
– Dr. Clinton Francis, California Polytechnic State University
For All Readers - AI Explainer
How does anthropogenic noise affect sensory environments for animals?
Anthropogenic noise changes sensory environments by interfering with communication between parents and offspring and masking important environmental cues, such as those that indicate predation risk. This can lead to changes in behavior, such as increased vigilance at the cost of time spent feeding offspring.
What were the two types of noise exposure studied in Western Bluebirds?
The researchers studied two types of noise exposure: (1) short-term (1-hour) experimental traffic noise playback and (2) continuous noise exposure experienced by nests located along a gradient of noise levels.
How did Western Bluebirds respond to short-term noise exposure?
During short-term noise playback, bluebirds showed reduced provisioning rates (feeding their young) compared to silent playback, especially during the first trial. Additionally, failed feeding attempts occurred only during noise playback trials.
How did Western Bluebirds respond to continuous noise exposure?
In continuous noise environments, bluebirds increased their provisioning rates as noise levels rose. They also resumed feeding more quickly after human disturbance when noise levels were higher.
Why were the effects of short-term and continuous noise exposure opposite?
The opposite effects may be due to differences in the experimental setup, such as noise characteristics, habitat context, nestling age, or latent environmental factors. It may also reflect inherent differences in how animals respond to short-term versus long-term noise exposure.
Why is the difference between short-term and continuous noise responses significant?
The findings suggest that results from short-term experiments may not fully capture the real-world impacts of continuous noise exposure. This is important because much of the research on noise pollution relies on short-term experiments, which might overlook long-term behavioral adaptations or broader ecological effects.
What are the broader implications of this research?
This study highlights the need for additional research to clarify how short-term experiments compare to real-world, long-term noise exposure. Understanding these differences is crucial as urbanization continues to reshape sensory landscapes, potentially influencing the behavior and survival of wildlife.
Divergent effects of short-term and continuous anthropogenic noise exposure on Western Bluebird parental care behavior
Sensory environments are rapidly changing due to increased human activity in urban and non-urban areas alike. For instance, natural and anthropogenic sounds can interfere with parent-offspring communication and mask cues reflective of predation risk, resulting in elevated vigilance at the cost of provisioning.
What are Article Spotlights?
Spotlighted articles are press released, and feature author interviews, AI explainers and more.
If you have published in Peer J and would like to be featured in an Article Spotlight please contact PeerJ.