All reviews of published articles are made public. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials. Note: This was optional for articles submitted before 13 February 2023.
Peer reviewers are encouraged (but not required) to provide their names to the authors when submitting their peer review. If they agree to provide their name, then their personal profile page will reflect a public acknowledgment that they performed a review (even if the article is rejected). If the article is accepted, then reviewers who provided their name will be associated with the article itself.
Congratulations on the acceptance of your paper.
[# PeerJ Staff Note - this decision was reviewed and approved by Paula Soares, a PeerJ Section Editor covering this Section #]
All previous concerns have been addressed.
A table containing all abbreviations should be added.
The corrections have been done as per requirement.
The impact and novelty has been properly presented
You are required to address the concerns of the reviewer.
[# PeerJ Staff Note: The review process has identified that the English language must be improved. PeerJ can provide language editing services - please contact us at [email protected] for pricing (be sure to provide your manuscript number and title) #]
1.All the previous concerns have been addressed except usage of abbreviations in abstract.
2. English should be corrected.Grammatical errors like "At present, there is no effective quantum solution exists to 26 process multiple patterns." should be corrected.
3.In "Motivation and contribution of work" a point is given as follows:
Existing
1.In Proof of Theorem 1 what does 't' stand for.
In the Results Section, observations are given Table wise, instead the findings that they emphasize should be given as headings and relevant Tables should be included under them.
Please incorporate the comments of the reviewers.
[# PeerJ Staff Note: Please ensure that all review and editorial comments are addressed in a response letter and any edits or clarifications mentioned in the letter are also inserted into the revised manuscript where appropriate. #]
Avoid using abbreviations in abstract unless it’s a time complexity.
Please provide a table for all the abbreviations.
Please merge the Prior work and Important Findings and Related work section into one section.
Theorem 1 and 2 are defined twice. It should be defined once only in the proposed methodology section.
The Section- ‘Simulation detail and analysis with algorithms evaluation criteria’ should be added as a subsection within Results and Discussions.
The article claims to proposes an efficient quantum solutions for exact multiple pattern matching to process the biological sequences. It appears that a lot of effort has been made in writing the article for presenting the solution through complexity analysis of algorithm. Pl. refer to the attachment.
Experimental Design is weak due to limitation of current hardware technology so cannot be basis of a publication. Further, Grover's search can overshoot if the number of solutions are not known in advance, which is going to be the case when t exact pattern matches are not known, so how are you going to handle such cases while performing simulation. Ideally there should be table for depicting numerical values of variables like N, m, t etc. along with constants C etc. and performances in time and space rather than equations. Further Table 11 and 12 should also report on the number or percentage of patterns correctly identified, incorrectly identified and incorrectly missed etc.
The article claims to proposes an efficient quantum solutions for exact multiple pattern matching to process the biological sequences. It appears that a lot of effort has been made in writing the article for presenting the solution through complexity analysis of algorithm. The article claims to find all
This work should be divided into two parts viz., theoretical and application part with simulations giving details on experimental accuracy of the proposed algorithm.
All text and materials provided via this peer-review history page are made available under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.