All reviews of published articles are made public. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials. Note: This was optional for articles submitted before 13 February 2023.
Peer reviewers are encouraged (but not required) to provide their names to the authors when submitting their peer review. If they agree to provide their name, then their personal profile page will reflect a public acknowledgment that they performed a review (even if the article is rejected). If the article is accepted, then reviewers who provided their name will be associated with the article itself.
Your manuscript is ready for publication.
Please consider the reviewers' comments and clarify or modify accordingly with them.
**PeerJ Staff Note:** Please ensure that all review, editorial, and staff comments are addressed in a response letter and that any edits or clarifications mentioned in the letter are also inserted into the revised manuscript where appropriate.
Seems okay.
Good plan.
Not sure. Can be rechecked.
N/A
1. Abstract should contain the reason of this study
2. The survey and review are two different terms with different meaning. authors should stick to one.
3. The introduction is somewhat cluttered with background information and technical details. It would benefit from a clearer separation between the general introduction to the topic and the specific objectives of the paper
4. Add comparison table in the related work section to highlight the difference between this review and existing reviews
1. include the inclusion, exclusion criteria of the papers
2. authors should add studies from 2025 as well
3. Protocol to review the study is missing
4. One of the main aim of the review paper is to provide comprehensive challenges and open directions. which are missing in this paper.
5. main sources of the selected studies should be presented in tabular form.
1. authors should highlight the main findings of the study in discussion section with the help of graphs and other visuals.
2. Outline study limitations
3. Add a graph that illustrate the trend of the techniques over the years
All text and materials provided via this peer-review history page are made available under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.