All reviews of published articles are made public. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials. Note: This was optional for articles submitted before 13 February 2023.
Peer reviewers are encouraged (but not required) to provide their names to the authors when submitting their peer review. If they agree to provide their name, then their personal profile page will reflect a public acknowledgment that they performed a review (even if the article is rejected). If the article is accepted, then reviewers who provided their name will be associated with the article itself.
Although the article is accepted for the final version.
[# PeerJ Staff Note - this decision was reviewed and approved by Jyotismita Chaki, a PeerJ Section Editor covering this Section #]
The Authors have incorporated the reviewer's comments in the revised manuscript.
no comment.
no comment.
The paper is good.
Acceptable in it's current form.
The Authors have incorporated the reviewer's comments in the revised manuscript.
feedback given was updated.
accepted but with minor revisions , all my comments have been amended in the paper.
valid
Remember to take into account the comments of the three reviewers.
IMPORTANT: This submission reports a machine learning study using free WEKA software (<https://www.cs.waikato.ac.nz/ml/weka/>). Please ensure that the workflow is described in enough detail to allow readers to reproduce the findings.
**PeerJ Staff Note:** Please ensure that all review, editorial, and staff comments are addressed in a response letter and that any edits or clarifications mentioned in the letter are also inserted into the revised manuscript where appropriate.
**Language Note:** PeerJ staff have identified that the English language needs to be improved. When you prepare your next revision, please either (i) have a colleague who is proficient in English and familiar with the subject matter review your manuscript, or (ii) contact a professional editing service to review your manuscript. PeerJ can provide language editing services - you can contact us at copyediting@peerj.com for pricing (be sure to provide your manuscript number and title). – PeerJ Staff
The paper is good but can be improved further.
The experimental works can be improved, especially in terms of system complexity.
The authors must improve the paper quality by incorporating the suggested comments.
The manuscript have be reviewed and the following are some suggestions-
1. Ref. [27] to [30] must be cited in the manuscript.
2. The fig. (1) and fig. (15) picture quality can be improved further.
3. Most of the mathematical equations must be cited.
4. The authors must discuss all the mathematical equations.
5. The authors must discuss all tables.
6. The authors must discuss the system complexity.
7. The manuscript presentation can be improved further.
Work has not been prepared well
Work is not validated with standards
not validated
consistency missing
good in general but some formatting and alignment issues.
- You need to describe the tool (Weka) that you used for your experiments and adding reference for the tool you used.(I did not see the reference to WEKA).
- For Experiments 1, experiment 2 and experiment 3 sections in your paper, you should add table to describe each dataset you used in your experiments to clarify your intext writing.
- no reference seen or any intext writing to mention from where you got your Datasets for experiments!.
valid, datasets are very well known,
in case you are going to publish page 16 onwards , you need to format and bring up your figures without leaving any empty pages , see page 17 and 18 as an example you can combine those 2 in 1 page. The rest are the same (page 19 , page 20 , page 21 , page 22, page 23 , page 24 , page 25 , page 26 , and so on for the rest of figures.).
All text and materials provided via this peer-review history page are made available under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.