Review History


All reviews of published articles are made public. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials. Note: This was optional for articles submitted before 13 February 2023.

Peer reviewers are encouraged (but not required) to provide their names to the authors when submitting their peer review. If they agree to provide their name, then their personal profile page will reflect a public acknowledgment that they performed a review (even if the article is rejected). If the article is accepted, then reviewers who provided their name will be associated with the article itself.

View examples of open peer review.

Summary

  • The initial submission of this article was received on September 17th, 2023 and was peer-reviewed by 2 reviewers and the Academic Editor.
  • The article was Accepted by the Academic Editor on October 8th, 2023.

Version 0.1 (accepted)

· Oct 8, 2023 · Academic Editor

Accept

I really appreciate your interest in the journal. Best.

[# PeerJ Staff Note - this decision was reviewed and approved by Yilun Shang, a PeerJ Section Editor covering this Section #]

·

Basic reporting

This paper is the revised version of the paper reviewed by me earlier. This version has addressed the review comments made by me and in its current form paper is reading well and can be accepted. Some minor comments are as follows:

1) Align equations such that the "=" sign between the Left Hand Side and Right Hand Side for all equations are aligned. This will improve readability.
2) From algorithm 1, remove the data types "Double", and "int". We don't need to specify data types in the algorithm.
3) In the abstract instead of (CPU, RAM, BW) it might be better to use (CPU, RAM, NETWORK) or (CPU, RAM, IO). BW (Bandwidth) is a property of the resource and not the resource itself.

Experimental design

The graphs in this version of paper are better and readable.

Validity of the findings

all good.

Additional comments

In its current form paper is acceptable. Reviewers can fix the minor issues mentioned.

·

Basic reporting

The authors have addressed all of my concerns

Experimental design

The authors have addressed all of my concerns

Validity of the findings

The authors have addressed all of my concerns

Additional comments

The authors have addressed all of my concerns

All text and materials provided via this peer-review history page are made available under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.