@cvieiram Everyone is talking about @eLife change this week. But they are not the first to challenge this way of peer review.
You could check @JOSS_TheOJ and @JOSE_TheOJ for starters. Or read their first-year review
https://t.co/qZUoUwDpGY
@micahgallen Especially after knowing that a diamond OA journal like @JOSS_TheOJ, that has IMO one of the best (open) reviewing system and policy out there, estimated the cost (including hosting, processing, and everything) to about... $3.50/article (https://t.co/StufvFdzCq)
@StellarPlanet Ah OK. We did a limited analysis in https://t.co/YDYoDTC1lh which looked at the first year of papers in JOSS (but it's now very out of date). ADS also indexes us which allows for some exploration of the data: https://t.co/8lKU2YVbxr
@braaannigan @rabernat @AnalyticsEng @JOSS_TheOJ Hi Liam, EiC for JOSS here. There is zero cost to authors publishing in JOSS. I agree this isn't explicit in the article you reference, we should have mentioned that here: https://t.co/rTu5r0Aj6P . That said, I think it's pretty clear here: https://t.co/wewm3uGeih
Our 'Journal of Open Source Software (JOSS): design and first-year review' article was published 1 year ago today in #OpenAccess journal @PeerJCompSci https://t.co/wk6g6xfS1V