@JuniperLSimonis @ReScienceEds @JOSS_TheOJ @PeerCommunityIn @Hao_and_Y I came up after. You may want to talk with @NPRougier , or read the paper: https://t.co/Hzp1BGho6w
"In the best case, authors may provide their source code as a compressed archive and they may feel confident their research is reproducible. But this is not exactly true." (Rougier et al., 2017).
https://t.co/0gSUDvoHWA https://t.co/IVVgJb7Bo7
@HannahSFraser @fidlerfm @TimParker88 I would be interested. Feel free to mail me more information. Also have you heard about the ReScience iniative? https://t.co/8r53miEp9I - https://t.co/V8mirjbtkV
@ColinJCarlson you can also submit this hard work reconstructing past results to the #rescience journal to get credit for your efforts:
https://t.co/qNzH1OOLao
https://t.co/PHWDBC1f0G
@danielskatz @Protohedgehog @ctitusbrown @DenubisX @petermurrayrust @LorenaABarba @dgraziotin @devinberg @kyleniemeyer @fperez_org @betatim @JOSS_TheOJ @up_jors Maybe @PeerJCompSci ? This is where @JOSS_TheOJ and @ReScienceEds published their "experience" papers. https://t.co/WU7Pi95MIg https://t.co/Oecx0yoKfY