All reviews of published articles are made public. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials. Note: This was optional for articles submitted before 13 February 2023.
Peer reviewers are encouraged (but not required) to provide their names to the authors when submitting their peer review. If they agree to provide their name, then their personal profile page will reflect a public acknowledgment that they performed a review (even if the article is rejected). If the article is accepted, then reviewers who provided their name will be associated with the article itself.
Your submission is ready for publication.
[# PeerJ Staff Note - this decision was reviewed and approved by Yilun Shang, a PeerJ Computer Science Section Editor covering this Section #]
The manuscript is updated and seems addressed the concerns
Looks good
Acceptable
I would like to suggest the editor for further decisions.
If the paper meets journal standards I would like to recommend for acceptance.
Thank you for inviting.
Please follow the reviewer's comments properly and resubmit the revised version of your paper as soon as possible.
Thank you very much
would like to suggest reviewing all the highlighted texts again, Please do express content in standard form.
CNN's are used for representation and classification part is handled by softmax. so please do revisit 5.2 section. also 4.4.3 - 4.4.7 sections revisit.
looks good
looks good
do review again
Just a few more comments to either address or rebut.
Add some more insights on over all idea
sufficient
Needs more discussion on the ML model insights and results table
Although the originality and the part of innovation in this article remains to be proven, it can however be published if one considers its didactic and pedagogical value.
All my raised points are addressed
All my raised points are addressed
All my raised points are addressed
All my raised points are addressed
Please revise your paper according to the reviewer's comments.
Thanks.
[# PeerJ Staff Note: The review process has identified that the English language must be improved. PeerJ can provide language editing services - please contact us at copyediting@peerj.com for pricing (be sure to provide your manuscript number and title) #]
[# PeerJ Staff Note: Please ensure that all review comments are addressed in a rebuttal letter and any edits or clarifications mentioned in the letter are also inserted into the revised manuscript where appropriate. It is a common mistake to address reviewer questions in the rebuttal letter but not in the revised manuscript. If a reviewer raised a question then your readers will probably have the same question so you should ensure that the manuscript can stand alone without the rebuttal letter. Directions on how to prepare a rebuttal letter can be found at: https://peerj.com/benefits/academic-rebuttal-letters/ #]
Needs to improve and emphasize methodology
Predictive model should be addressed properly.
figure 10 and 11 can be merged with temp with smoke and light.
What are the list major contributions and discuss.
Do address the input data format and preprocessing of which has passed to ML algorithms for decision making.
Need to update more performance matrics.
Overall improvement is required
The paper present a relevant topic of research as the world in moving towards everything on internet.
The idea and the results are presented in a good way, the authors need to consider following minor edits for final publications:
English need a polishing and grammar check.
I suggest to add some line at the end of introduction section aiming to present the scope of your research work and what authors could expect in the results section.
Need to elaborate the importance of used research methodology.
Research methodology is well described.
I suggest to give justification of used research approach with latest references.
Also grape the importance and novelty of used research methodology.
IoT based smart home automation using blockchain and deep learning models, is good and timely study that will give a good insight to industry practitioners to develop new and effective strategies to make the IoT successful and efficient in real world environment.
I suggest to elaborate the implications of your study for research and practitioners community.
No
All text and materials provided via this peer-review history page are made available under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.