Review History

All reviews of published articles are made public. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials. Note: This was optional for articles submitted before 13 February 2023.

Peer reviewers are encouraged (but not required) to provide their names to the authors when submitting their peer review. If they agree to provide their name, then their personal profile page will reflect a public acknowledgment that they performed a review (even if the article is rejected). If the article is accepted, then reviewers who provided their name will be associated with the article itself.

View examples of open peer review.


  • The initial submission of this article was received on April 22nd, 2017 and was peer-reviewed by the Academic Editor.
  • The article was Accepted by the Academic Editor on April 25th, 2017.

Version 0.1 (accepted)

· Apr 25, 2017 · Academic Editor


This submission was previously reviewed by the GCB 2016 conference and the authors supplied the prior reviews and their response to those reviews. I have evaluated the reviews and the revised materials - the response/edits to the previous reviews are considered sufficient to move forward with acceptance. Latex references in the latest version were missing, but were fine in the diff version, so these should be updated.

External reviews were received for this submission. These reviews were used by the Editor when they made their decision, and can be downloaded below.

All text and materials provided via this peer-review history page are made available under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.