These results question the relevance of policies requiring data availability statements. https://t.co/9RbIenIn6B https://t.co/hSvgLaFWpM https://t.co/a10RDkqviV
#Data sharing may improve the rigor and reproducibility of #research, thereby contributing to #scientific advancements.
Find more in @thePeerJ's article here https://t.co/TWBUgI4LeW https://t.co/vEJBZl7l29
Pripenjanje podatkov k znanstvenim objavam spodbuja ali zahteva manj kot 40% revij. Najbolj pridne so revije povezane z zdravjem, naravoslovci pa šepajo. Prav tako šepajo komercialne revije. Revije iz Evrope še najbolj spodbujajo pripenjanje podatkov.
https://t.co/t6UazonyVg
Data sharing policies of 700 journals analysed in this research https://t.co/e7n57kNlyH in @thePeerJ 44% had no data sharing policy, 18% had a weak ("encourages") policy, and 38% had a strong policy. Increased engagement from commercial publishers noted.
#Datasharing policies of journals in life, #health, and physical sciences indexed in Journal Citation Reports
"Of the 700 journals, 44.0% had no data sharing policy"
https://t.co/jqw9wbpOc0
Raw Data on Figshare: https://t.co/3EcFMAzhnX https://t.co/7LxG7om65U
Study on data sharing policies of 700 journals found 44% had no data sharing policy, 18% had a weak policy and 38% had a strong policy. European and Life science journals were more likely to have a strong data sharing policy. https://t.co/LAfrthvXkn https://t.co/YpIsZBlEo5