Research groups: How big should they be?

Plus smaller groups are comparatively more productive and also spend their money more efficiently!. Win win win!! https://t.co/pjlAgFJupe https://t.co/D7wveHya9a https://t.co/fV487StnOR https://t.co/ATY7AqCrZ1
@moorejh Nice paper, it makes sense. Previous studies have also concluded the importance of allocating more funding to small groups: https://t.co/MQVDyT42cF Unfortunately, some research institutions dislike small groups based on the fallacy that critical mass is necessary for disruption.
@carlyziter I don't feel like I have been a PI long enough to weigh in. But we had a "faculty coffee" discussion about this and everyone's response was different. For the discussion a colleague shared this paper: https://t.co/z4Qu7vVh7B
RT @ChemBioUSC: Research groups: How big should they be?. In agreement with previous studies, "...an increase in productivity will be achie…
2668 days ago
RT @garagao: "Our analyses suggest that an increase in #productivity will be achieved by #funding more PIs with small #research groups" h…
RT @ChemBioUSC: Research groups: How big should they be?. In agreement with previous studies, "...an increase in productivity will be achie…
RT @ChemBioUSC: Research groups: How big should they be?. In agreement with previous studies, "...an increase in productivity will be achie…
RT @Nano_Mol: https://t.co/ggMlaLH6fq
RT @ChemBioUSC: Research groups: How big should they be?. In agreement with previous studies, "...an increase in productivity will be achie…
RT @ChemBioUSC: Research groups: How big should they be?. In agreement with previous studies, "...an increase in productivity will be achie…
RT @ChemBioUSC: Research groups: How big should they be?. In agreement with previous studies, "...an increase in productivity will be achie…
RT @ChemBioUSC: Research groups: How big should they be?. In agreement with previous studies, "...an increase in productivity will be achie…
RT @ChemBioUSC: Research groups: How big should they be?. In agreement with previous studies, "...an increase in productivity will be achie…
RT @ChemBioUSC: Research groups: How big should they be?. In agreement with previous studies, "...an increase in productivity will be achie…
2669 days ago
RT @ChemBioUSC: Research groups: How big should they be?. In agreement with previous studies, "...an increase in productivity will be achie…
RT @BriersYves: Message to our funders: according to this paper your money in our group is a good investment with high return https://t.co…
2669 days ago
RT @ChemBioUSC: Research groups: How big should they be?. In agreement with previous studies, "...an increase in productivity will be achie…
RT @ChemBioUSC: Research groups: How big should they be?. In agreement with previous studies, "...an increase in productivity will be achie…
RT @ChemBioUSC: Research groups: How big should they be?. In agreement with previous studies, "...an increase in productivity will be achie…
RT @BriersYves: Message to our funders: according to this paper your money in our group is a good investment with high return https://t.co…
2669 days ago
Message to our funders: according to this paper your money in our group is a good investment with high return https://t.co/sJaTPPvRwf
https://t.co/ggMlaLH6fq
2669 days ago
RT @ChemBioUSC: Research groups: How big should they be?. In agreement with previous studies, "...an increase in productivity will be achie…
2670 days ago
RT @ChemBioUSC: Research groups: How big should they be?. In agreement with previous studies, "...an increase in productivity will be achie…
RT @ChemBioUSC: Research groups: How big should they be?. In agreement with previous studies, "...an increase in productivity will be achie…