Ryoichi WATANABE @watanaberkyoto 1011 days ago

Software timing mega-study https://t.co/up5hQwVzxe @PeerJLifeより

CASL research centre @CASL_QMU 1232 days ago

@JoyMillsLing @drdokovova See also a review Bridges et al 2020. DOI: https://t.co/YMQK8JBeg0 Kim et al DOI: https://t.co/qLLfGqEOQ5 From Dokovova et al.: Matched-accent processing: Bulgarian-English bilinguals do not have a processing advantage with Bulgarian-accented English over native English speech

PsychoPy @psychopy 1238 days ago

@MGreenePhD @justin_ales @StevenDakin See the timing study https://t.co/QWfAlnamoB Yes, sub-ms precision is certainly possible (and less likely to be ruined by coding errors than on some packages) but as @justin_ales says the key is the OS, window manager/ compositor and these days even the monitor, all adding lags

PsychoPy @psychopy 1238 days ago

@justin_ales @StevenDakin @ShivSivakumaran We're working hard on that and it improves with every release. We've got some treats for online vision science this summer I promise

Cathal McCrory @CathalMcCrory1 1327 days ago

RT @HirstRj: @jpsnijder @DermotLynott 1. Recent work examining reliability of cognitive measures via smartphones from @ThomasPronk123 https…

Dr. Rebecca Hirst @HirstRj 1327 days ago

@jpsnijder @DermotLynott 1. Recent work examining reliability of cognitive measures via smartphones from @ThomasPronk123 https://t.co/w29fSGQzDY 2. Comparisons more generally on reliability of reaction time measures and stimulus presentstion in browsers from @dvbridges @peircej https://t.co/F6zJOOkPbi

Dr Linda K. Kaye @LindaKKaye 1376 days ago

@ErinWestgate Would recommend these two: https://t.co/bwbZUPnN0m https://t.co/ImkAlzqPh2

Jason Geller @jgeller_phd 1473 days ago

@LisaDeBruine @rachelostrand I think there is some variability but it doesn’t seem too bad…https://t.co/v2RVerG3f2 and https://t.co/UWCefmVRJF and https://t.co/8l4Dm9KXpw

Edwin Dalmaijer @esdalmaijer 1473 days ago

@LisaDeBruine @raryskin @rachelostrand There are two big web-based timing studies: - Anwyl-Irvine et al. https://t.co/tf67UOC8SS - Bridges et al. https://t.co/aOHCARTU2W Both show that timing isn't super consistent between platforms, but consistent enough for many purposes. Would recommend within-participant design.

ＯIKEDA @AI_psy 1493 days ago

RT @SogoHiroyuki: TWSではオンライン実験の時間精度の質問が出ていたと思いますが、こんな論文が出ています。 https://t.co/sb1XR4HUdI https://t.co/3AY2wvQfvu

@psycle44 1493 days ago

RT @SogoHiroyuki: TWSではオンライン実験の時間精度の質問が出ていたと思いますが、こんな論文が出ています。 https://t.co/sb1XR4HUdI https://t.co/3AY2wvQfvu

('・ω・`)b @HIMI_toshi 1494 days ago

RT @SogoHiroyuki: TWSではオンライン実験の時間精度の質問が出ていたと思いますが、こんな論文が出ています。 https://t.co/sb1XR4HUdI https://t.co/3AY2wvQfvu

MU ranakaSei JI @SeijMura 1494 days ago

RT @SogoHiroyuki: TWSではオンライン実験の時間精度の質問が出ていたと思いますが、こんな論文が出ています。 https://t.co/sb1XR4HUdI https://t.co/3AY2wvQfvu

das Kino @kyn02666 1494 days ago

RT @SogoHiroyuki: TWSではオンライン実験の時間精度の質問が出ていたと思いますが、こんな論文が出ています。 https://t.co/sb1XR4HUdI https://t.co/3AY2wvQfvu

Yoshihiko Kunisato/国里愛彦 @KunisatoY 1494 days ago

RT @SogoHiroyuki: TWSではオンライン実験の時間精度の質問が出ていたと思いますが、こんな論文が出ています。 https://t.co/sb1XR4HUdI https://t.co/3AY2wvQfvu

MK @MK_cogn 1494 days ago

RT @SogoHiroyuki: TWSではオンライン実験の時間精度の質問が出ていたと思いますが、こんな論文が出ています。 https://t.co/sb1XR4HUdI https://t.co/3AY2wvQfvu

Sogo Hiroyuki @SogoHiroyuki 1494 days ago

TWSではオンライン実験の時間精度の質問が出ていたと思いますが、こんな論文が出ています。 https://t.co/sb1XR4HUdI https://t.co/3AY2wvQfvu

Prof Tamara Rathcke (she/her) @tamarathcke 1498 days ago

RT @psychopy: Our Timing Mega-study is now available at PeerJ If you care about timing precision in your studies then please read carefull…

Sylvain Pourciel @SPourciel 1510 days ago

RT @psychopy: Our Timing Mega-study is now available at PeerJ If you care about timing precision in your studies then please read carefull…

Léon Franzen @leonfrADC 1549 days ago

@MeikeRamon @micheleveldsman You can find my summary of the twitter wisdom of last December here https://t.co/cf5emioW18 There are also these two studies comparing timing accuracy and the effects of common OS - browser pairings, etc. Maybe they are of help. https://t.co/4jXASliQPS https://t.co/tvPiz5nboj

Brian P. Keane @BrianKeaneLab 1586 days ago

One more reason not to use MacOS for any study that requires precise stimulus timing: Software timing mega-study https://t.co/I83VnrvV8V via @thePeerJ

PsychoPy @psychopy 1619 days ago

@HirstRj @PsychScientists Yes, and that keyboard class has been used in Builder-generated code since v3.2.0. See our paper showing timing (from Builder): https://t.co/QWfAlnamoB Sadly, a lot of people writing their code by hand are still using the event module and not getting such good timing

PsychoPy @psychopy 1628 days ago

@CoLaB_Gc @SuzAdlof One issue is that macOS has less good screen timing (triple buffering that can't be turned off) so, if you need ms precision, we'd recommend avoiding it anyway. For more info see the Timing Mega-study: https://t.co/QWfAlnamoB But could use macOS to create and win/ubuntu to run

PsychoPy @psychopy 1632 days ago

@GorillaPsyc @ceptional @willdwebster1 @ThomasPronk123 @alexanderirvine Incorrect. Our timing "megastudy" used the Blackbox Toolkit robot actuator as well. https://t.co/QWfAlnamoB

William Webster @willdwebster1 1633 days ago

@ceptional @psychopy @GorillaPsyc I'm sure the time behind @psychopy will also comment separately, but you can find their excellent timing study here: https://t.co/bkG0S7dtvJ 2/N