Review History


To increase transparency, PeerJ operates a system of 'optional signed reviews and history'. This takes two forms: (1) peer reviewers are encouraged, but not required, to provide their names (if they do so, then their profile page records the articles they have reviewed), and (2) authors are given the option of reproducing their entire peer review history alongside their published article (in which case the complete peer review process is provided, including revisions, rebuttal letters and editor decision letters).

New to public reviews? Learn more about optional signed reviews and how to write a better rebuttal letter.

Summary

  • The initial submission of this article was received on March 19th, 2015 and was peer-reviewed by 2 reviewers and the Academic Editor.
  • The article was Accepted by the Academic Editor on April 13th, 2015.

Version 0.1 (accepted)

· · Academic Editor

Accept

Dear Dr. Delphia,

Two experts in the field have carefully reviewed your manuscript. After a thorough review, I’m pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been accepted for publication. Thank you for your fine contribution.

Reviewer 1 ·

Basic reporting

No Comments

Experimental design

No Comments

Validity of the findings

No Comments

Comments for the author

This is an excellent article on the physiology of an important native pollinator. The authors have done a stellar job in terms of both experimental design and scientific reporting. Further studies will be needed to fully assess the effects of wing wear and lipid stores on ovarian development and bee reproductive success, but this manuscript is an important first step to launch future research.

Reviewer 2 ·

Basic reporting

No comments

Experimental design

No comments

Validity of the findings

No comments

Comments for the author

The manuscript by O'Neill et al., describes how changes the wing wear, lipid content and oocyte size of M. rotundata, in order to correlate them with reproductive performance and the fitness in a field of an important "solitary bee pollinated crop", alfalfa.

Based on the results, beside the normal and always present environmental factors, as for example wheather or food source, a number of not completely controllable seasonal factors are present and can affects the performance of the pollinators. Indeed, there was a negative correlation between wing wear and oocyte size.

This study, in my opinion, can add more and interesting information about this pollinator to take into account for its managment for pollination service, even if is not in deep understood the degree of seasonal changes that can affect fitness and performances.

All text and materials provided via this peer-review history page are made available under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.