A specimen-level phylogenetic analysis and taxonomic revision of Diplodocidae (Dinosauria, Sauropoda)

ディプロドクス・ハロルム Diplodocus hallorum USNM 10865 D. hallorumの事は、元"セイスモサウルス"と呼んだ方が通りは良いかもしれません。 Tschopp et al. (2015) https://t.co/7m8eTY40M1 Gilmore (1932) https://t.co/nqtGPnXbMd https://t.co/t4qLG6xrMd
1291 days ago
RT @kristof_smeyers: @pressfuturist @EtheHerring woah woah, Brontosaurus made a triumphant return five years ago https://t.co/DSVST1pCQ0
1292 days ago
RT @kristof_smeyers: @pressfuturist @EtheHerring woah woah, Brontosaurus made a triumphant return five years ago https://t.co/DSVST1pCQ0
@pressfuturist @EtheHerring woah woah, Brontosaurus made a triumphant return five years ago https://t.co/DSVST1pCQ0
@DMantarctica @ericsteig It's gone back and forth, but as far as I'm aware, it's currently considered valid, thanks to a 2015 study (below): https://t.co/hQCXZQV7l5
1385 days ago
@kiddopediatv It made a comeback actually since 2015 https://t.co/BWy9FjG3yW https://t.co/Spyz1qLNfF
@charlesbarzallo In case you didn't find it, the Tschopp et al. paper is here: https://t.co/CBmhtRbRI7 With free access! It's a massive review of not only Brontosaurus but the rest of the members of its family. It's a long one, but a good detailed study!
1477 days ago
RT @JezRoff: Palaeobiologist Brian Beck shattered my childhood dreams by telling me that Brontosaurus was a synonym for Apatosaurus and nev…
1478 days ago
Palaeobiologist Brian Beck shattered my childhood dreams by telling me that Brontosaurus was a synonym for Apatosaurus and never actually existed. Get f***** Brian, Brontosaurus is back #thunderlizards https://t.co/yA211p4zSZ https://t.co/1cBUDYTER4
The answer is No and Maybe. Not all Apatosaurus are Brontosaurus, but some species that were called Apatosaurus may be better classified as a related group, that Tschopp et al. 2015 identified in a phylogenetic analysis and decided to call Brontosaurus. https://t.co/CKhSTpeTd7
1523 days ago
@talitherose @demonicalamari @AaronLinguini There are a bunch of articles from 2015 saying it was reinstated as a species. Here is the study from the peerj journal https://t.co/Kk0RjcjHpk and a time article about it https://t.co/WK4QvnKYls
@sealsandsass Emanuel's paper is even open access! https://t.co/Y9Dvtun1bc
RT @thePeerJ: #ThrowbackThursday #tbt The #Brontosaurus is Back! A specimen-level phylogenetic analysis and taxonomic revision of #Diplodoc…
RT @thePeerJ: #ThrowbackThursday #tbt The #Brontosaurus is Back! A specimen-level phylogenetic analysis and taxonomic revision of #Diplodoc…
RT @thePeerJ: #ThrowbackThursday #tbt The #Brontosaurus is Back! A specimen-level phylogenetic analysis and taxonomic revision of #Diplodoc…
#ThrowbackThursday #tbt The #Brontosaurus is Back! A specimen-level phylogenetic analysis and taxonomic revision of #Diplodocidae (Dinosauria, Sauropoda) Tschopp E, Mateus O, Benson RBJ 2015 https://t.co/5VVfMtElIp Free infographic download! https://t.co/MBA9hGsfXA #paleontology https://t.co/rH6q13kRCt
1691 days ago
@dsfpspacefl1ght @girlandkat It is true. Brontosaurus is back. https://t.co/MGGVZF2be2
1695 days ago
#Brontosaurus is back! View graphical abstract https://t.co/cx8RTxMjA4 & full article https://t.co/jeJ9HMt3MI
Spoiler! The paleontological community apparently disagrees! An influential 2015 paper argued that they were distinct species; Prothero admires that study but says he remains convinced that they're the same. https://t.co/pP4UfcGV6O
2005 days ago
RT @hirolichyi10: ディプロドクス科の標本をそれぞれ分析して、分類の再検討を行なった2015年の論文 ブロントサウルスを復活させた論文といった方が有名かも? https://t.co/7m8eTXMpnr #ディプロドクス類復元教室 #恐竜復元教室
RT @hirolichyi10: ディプロドクス科の標本をそれぞれ分析して、分類の再検討を行なった2015年の論文 ブロントサウルスを復活させた論文といった方が有名かも? https://t.co/7m8eTXMpnr #ディプロドクス類復元教室 #恐竜復元教室
RT @hirolichyi10: ディプロドクス科の標本をそれぞれ分析して、分類の再検討を行なった2015年の論文 ブロントサウルスを復活させた論文といった方が有名かも? https://t.co/7m8eTXMpnr #ディプロドクス類復元教室 #恐竜復元教室
RT @hirolichyi10: ディプロドクス科の標本をそれぞれ分析して、分類の再検討を行なった2015年の論文 ブロントサウルスを復活させた論文といった方が有名かも? https://t.co/7m8eTXMpnr #ディプロドクス類復元教室 #恐竜復元教室
RT @hirolichyi10: ディプロドクス科の標本をそれぞれ分析して、分類の再検討を行なった2015年の論文 ブロントサウルスを復活させた論文といった方が有名かも? https://t.co/7m8eTXMpnr #ディプロドクス類復元教室 #恐竜復元教室
RT @hirolichyi10: ディプロドクス科の標本をそれぞれ分析して、分類の再検討を行なった2015年の論文 ブロントサウルスを復活させた論文といった方が有名かも? https://t.co/7m8eTXMpnr #ディプロドクス類復元教室 #恐竜復元教室