Kumar @operation_cloud 1055 days ago

RT @kristof_smeyers: @pressfuturist @EtheHerring woah woah, Brontosaurus made a triumphant return five years ago https://t.co/DSVST1pCQ0

DinoDJ @DinoDJ14 1145 days ago

@Wraith27143775 Though it has long been dead named for being misinterpreted as apatosaurus they actually reassessed it’s material and there’s enough distinctions that make it a valid genus again so it exists (again) https://t.co/WdKSqPPSLR

Sophie S. @Sophiesaurus98 1164 days ago

RT @ASWolniewicz: #MyFavoritePeerJPaper is a great example of how to combine careful anatomical observation, phylogenetic analysis and a nu…

PeerJ - the Journal of Life & Environment @PeerJLife 1164 days ago

RT @ASWolniewicz: #MyFavoritePeerJPaper is a great example of how to combine careful anatomical observation, phylogenetic analysis and a nu…

Nathaniel Gore @TheNGore 1165 days ago

RT @ASWolniewicz: #MyFavoritePeerJPaper is a great example of how to combine careful anatomical observation, phylogenetic analysis and a nu…

lil rodolith @paleourodon 1165 days ago

RT @ASWolniewicz: #MyFavoritePeerJPaper is a great example of how to combine careful anatomical observation, phylogenetic analysis and a nu…

PeerJ Publishing @thePeerJ 1165 days ago

RT @ASWolniewicz: #MyFavoritePeerJPaper is a great example of how to combine careful anatomical observation, phylogenetic analysis and a nu…

Andrzej Wolniewicz @ASWolniewicz 1165 days ago

#MyFavoritePeerJPaper is a great example of how to combine careful anatomical observation, phylogenetic analysis and a numerical approach in order to establish the phylogeny and taxonomy of extinct organisms, in this case diplodocid sauropod dinosaurs!

monê @Sarahkura_ 1197 days ago

https://t.co/TiFjHOdg2B eu li... eu li essa porra inteira

llewelly @llewelly 1221 days ago

@Patbagley no Brontosaurus wasn't a mashup; see Tschopp et al 2015 https://t.co/irZ2QyuxRZ

マルクロス ✏ @MARCROSMMM14 1296 days ago

RT @RizkiusMaulanae: @smegolas @BradtheCurator It's been valid and distinct since 2015. https://t.co/BWy9FjYcN4 https://t.co/8J1eAsQAo9

M. Rizky M. @RizkiusMaulanae 1296 days ago

@smegolas @BradtheCurator It's been valid and distinct since 2015. https://t.co/BWy9FjYcN4 https://t.co/8J1eAsQAo9

Juan Yu See #BLM @IronhideArcee 1376 days ago

@TPixel55 @SpahnCameron Diplodocus hallorum is the only diplodocine species with vertical mid-caudal neural spines. The other diplodocines, including Diplodocus longus, are found to have slightly posterodorsally directed neural spines instead. https://t.co/IuCFj0WIII

Vincent Reneleau @VincentReneleau 1403 days ago

Mais les 2 derniers n'ont été utilisés que sur l'original, pas sur les moulages. Et d'après une étude parue en 2015, le crâne ne serait même pas du Diplodocus, mais un autre genre : Galeamopus. Du coup on ne connaît peut être AUCUN crâne de Diplodocus!

Gunnar Bivens (Commissions Open) @bricksmashtv 1415 days ago

@PPaleoartist @tyrannoraptoran here’s a *very* simplified timeline showing when Brontosaurus became a valid genus again actually a few years ago, and here’s the paper that actually made the split https://t.co/ypQh8zFmkH https://t.co/9wiewiDFFC

加藤博／恐竜のお兄さん @hirolichyi10 1429 days ago

RT @hirolichyi10: ディプロドクス・ハロルム Diplodocus hallorum USNM 10865 D. hallorumの事は、元"セイスモサウルス"と呼んだ方が通りは良いかもしれません。 Tschopp et al. (2015) https:…

Sophie Shepherd @Sophiesaurus98 1622 days ago

@LtColonelMisato @Magara1954 Brontosaurus is actually considered a valid genus again as of this paper’s publication! https://t.co/gwFmuxATYp

Phil Jones @phil24jones 1679 days ago

@rwb76 @jester_mouse @IFLScience https://t.co/XwZREnbuMV

@Philoceratops 1684 days ago

@mike_hamm @TomHoltzPaleo @tyrannoraptoran yes! it's quite lengthy, but I'm sure that's not gonna be a problem... https://t.co/dyMrIcPBmf

Alessio Ciaffi @CiaffiAlessio 1708 days ago

@Michael_Tomlin_ @king_tyranno @ArminReindl @Strangeandlosts Brontosaurus history can be confusing, we know that the animal existed, there was just debate on how to call it. After this paper we now consider it a valid genus: https://t.co/sWvQTfup4u

Das_Galaxias @dasgalaxias2 1713 days ago

@Marcelo_Cassaro @_pmnetto Na saudade fui dar uma lida por ai e descobri uma boa noticia (daquelas que são boas pq não mudam a vida de ninguem rs): o brotonssauro ta de volta. Um trabalho taxonomico de 2015, da família Diplodocidae restaurou Brontosaurus como um gênero válido: https://t.co/0EdSKo2dK7

Fernando Blanco (Cuidaos y portaos bien, leñe)✂️ @FBpsy 1783 days ago

@Epicureo64 Eso si te fías de los métodos estadísticos para extraer árboles filogenéticos, que hay quien los critica. El paper está aquí en abierto: https://t.co/EApxxzditW

Vary @VaryIngweion 1799 days ago

@SinuheDiogenes @AgarthaEmma Brontosaurus sí existió. https://t.co/KJoHe8pnaT https://t.co/FlPREXmGrM

ヒロくん (恐竜のお兄さん) @hirolichyi10 1806 days ago

@Tricerasun1353 ディプロドクス科の恐竜の標本については、この論文を読めば何とかなるよ https://t.co/7m8eTXMpnr

ヒロくん (恐竜のお兄さん) @hirolichyi10 1806 days ago

RT @hirolichyi10: ディプロドクス・ハロルム Diplodocus hallorum USNM 10865 D. hallorumの事は、元"セイスモサウルス"と呼んだ方が通りは良いかもしれません。 Tschopp et al. (2015) https:…