WANT A PROFILE LIKE THIS?
Create my FREE Plan Or learn about other options
Carlo Fantoni
PeerJ Author & Reviewer
575 Points

Contributions by role

Author 540
Reviewer 35
Answers 2

Contributions by subject area

Anthropology
Psychiatry and Psychology
Neuroscience
Human-Computer Interaction
Statistics
Cognitive Disorders
World Wide Web and Web Science

By Q&A topic

Human-computer-interaction
World-wide-web-and-web-science

Carlo Fantoni

PeerJ Author & Reviewer

Summary

I am assistant professor in General Psychology at the DSV of Units, where since 2012 I have established a new Active Perception Laboratory. The core of my research regards the examination of how sensory cues, active movements of the body, internal states (i.e., emotions) as well as social factors (i.e., presence of others) are integrated to support the perception of whole 3D objects and action control.

Human-Computer Interaction Neuroscience Psychiatry & Psychology

Past or current institution affiliations

University of Trieste

Work details

Associate professor

University of Trieste
Department of Life Sciences, Psychology Unit "Gaetano Kanizsa", University of Trieste

PeerJ Contributions

  • Articles 4
  • Questions 1
October 29, 2018
Don’t worry, be active: how to facilitate the detection of errors in immersive virtual environments
Sara Rigutti, Marta Stragà, Marco Jez, Giulio Baldassi, Andrea Carnaghi, Piero Miceu, Carlo Fantoni
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5844 PubMed 30397547
September 27, 2018
Investigating the relationship between intergroup physical contact and attitudes towards foreigners: the mediating role of quality of intergroup contact
Soraya E. Shamloo, Andrea Carnaghi, Carlo Fantoni
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5680 PubMed 30280046
February 15, 2016
Bodily action penetrates affective perception
Carlo Fantoni, Sara Rigutti, Walter Gerbino
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1677 PubMed 26893964
March 10, 2015
Web party effect: a cocktail party effect in the web environment
Sara Rigutti, Carlo Fantoni, Walter Gerbino
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.828 PubMed 25802803

1 Question

0
What about the Rigutti et al. 2015 Peerj paper?
about Expected usability is not a valid indicator of experienced usability