Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented groups in STEM

RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
Double blind reviews might be a solution! ' [Their] results indicate that unprofessional reviews likely have and will continue to perpetuate the gap in STEM fields for traditionally underrepresented groups in the sciences. @AcademicChatter #openscience https://t.co/S1EKHzcEil
2115 days ago
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
2115 days ago
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
Kindness and professionalism go a long way. They can even help promote #STEM diversity
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
2115 days ago
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
2115 days ago
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
2115 days ago
RT @UCSanDiegoWiHS: "Women and non-binary people were the most likely to report significant delays in productivity after receiving unprofes…
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
2115 days ago
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
2115 days ago
RT @UCSanDiegoWiHS: "Women and non-binary people were the most likely to report significant delays in productivity after receiving unprofes…
"Women and non-binary people were the most likely to report significant delays in productivity after receiving unprofessional reviews. "Full study at https://t.co/VxuSWyzlsj #WomenInSTEM #WomenInScience #WomenInAcademia Thank you @NSilbiger for the study! https://t.co/yKR4uDDB9F
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
2115 days ago
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
2115 days ago
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
RT @Prof_Harley: Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented groups in STEM https://t.co/kfwNvH6Mnv
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…