Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented groups in STEM

View article
2114 days ago
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
reply repost on X like
2114 days ago
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
reply repost on X like
"This paper is, simply, manure" - one of the kinder examples of the unprofessional reviews survey respondents received. Be appalled. Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented groups https://t.co/MTqqBTpkp2 via @thePeerJ
reply repost on X like
RT @tcyronak: Important article. What the authors call ‘mean spirited or cruel’ review comments (see Fig. 1) are completely unacceptable, a…
reply repost on X like
Unprofessional peer reviews are harmful https://t.co/a1JWdAHl44 via @thePeerJ
reply repost on X like
RT @UlissesRocha13: Double blind reviews might be a solution! ' [Their] results indicate that unprofessional reviews likely have and will…
reply repost on X like
2114 days ago
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
reply repost on X like
"Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm #underrepresented groups in #STEM" Appalled by reviewer comments showcased in this paper. Another reason I support double-blind reviews and (when that's not possible) always sign my name to my reviews. https://t.co/qlVLNZZB9g
reply repost on X like
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
reply repost on X like
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
reply repost on X like
2114 days ago
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
reply repost on X like
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
reply repost on X like
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
reply repost on X like
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
reply repost on X like
2114 days ago
Important article. What the authors call ‘mean spirited or cruel’ review comments (see Fig. 1) are completely unacceptable, and in a just world would result in some of these reviewers being banned from participating in the peer review process. https://t.co/elxYT7CTjr
reply repost on X like
2114 days ago
RT @NSilbiger: @Amber_D_Stubler @thePeerJ Let’s work together to remove this significant barrier to equity in STEM! https://t.co/F0VJY1eEE8…
reply repost on X like
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
reply repost on X like
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
reply repost on X like
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
reply repost on X like
2114 days ago
RT @Psephenus: Bottom line, as a reviewer you should always be constructive, never emotional. A great study on the repercussion of unprofes…
reply repost on X like
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
reply repost on X like
"[x] tried this in the 1990s and failed, and he was more creative than you."
reply repost on X like
2114 days ago
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
reply repost on X like
Different groups equally likely to receive unprofessional reviews, “consistent diffs in downstream effects bw groups in perceived impacts on self-confidence, productivity & career trajectories” https://t.co/Qur5ARbpsZ via @thePeerJ #peerreview
reply repost on X like
RT @UlissesRocha13: Double blind reviews might be a solution! ' [Their] results indicate that unprofessional reviews likely have and will…
reply repost on X like