Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented groups in STEM

RT @MarcKissel: The last thing i do before i submit a review is ask myself how i would feel abt reading the review if it was my paper. This…
RT @EricTopol: Would be interesting to see the relationship between rude reviewers of science papers and nasty folks on @twitter https://t…
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
RT @MarcKissel: The last thing i do before i submit a review is ask myself how i would feel abt reading the review if it was my paper. This…
Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented groups in STEM https://t.co/HU3IQ616ai #peerreview #research #science #scichat #discrimination HT @gracielagon
RT @EricTopol: Would be interesting to see the relationship between rude reviewers of science papers and nasty folks on @twitter https://t…
2123 days ago
RT @EricTopol: Would be interesting to see the relationship between rude reviewers of science papers and nasty folks on @twitter https://t…
2123 days ago
Would be interesting to see the relationship between rude reviewers of science papers and nasty folks on @twitter https://t.co/4hcKv5f5aM by @NerdyChristie @ScienceInsider on @PeerJ paper https://t.co/KECuJMCnrH by @NSilbiger & @Amber_D_Stubler https://t.co/IQqCINsy2m
Worth the read paper on #peerreview in #science entitled, "Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented groups in STEM" https://t.co/PFMDbMJ9UM via @thePeerJ
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
RT @tcyronak: Important article. What the authors call ‘mean spirited or cruel’ review comments (see Fig. 1) are completely unacceptable, a…
2123 days ago
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
2123 days ago
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
2123 days ago
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
RT @Psephenus: Bottom line, as a reviewer you should always be constructive, never emotional. A great study on the repercussion of unprofes…