Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented groups in STEM

2119 days ago
RT @EricTopol: Would be interesting to see the relationship between rude reviewers of science papers and nasty folks on @twitter https://t…
More than half of surveyed scientist from 46 countries reported receiving unprofessional peer-review comments. Everyone gets bad peer reviews but their negative effects are greater for underrepresented groups https://t.co/NKAYtDeIqu
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
RT @EricTopol: Would be interesting to see the relationship between rude reviewers of science papers and nasty folks on @twitter https://t…
RT @EricTopol: Would be interesting to see the relationship between rude reviewers of science papers and nasty folks on @twitter https://t…
So important! - also in Tenure and Promotion Unprofessional peer reviews are harmful https://t.co/TCEzKMW3vJ via @thePeerJ
2119 days ago
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
2119 days ago
RT @tcyronak: Important article. What the authors call ‘mean spirited or cruel’ review comments (see Fig. 1) are completely unacceptable, a…
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
2119 days ago
RT @KOKEdit: .@sciencemagazine: Some #peerreviewers are rude & unprofessional, personally targeting a STEM researcher, not giving construct…
2119 days ago
An interesting and insightful paper on a downside of scientific peer-review. https://t.co/vjyued7Nt7
2119 days ago
RT @EricTopol: Would be interesting to see the relationship between rude reviewers of science papers and nasty folks on @twitter https://t…
RT @moorejh: Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented groups in STEM https://t.co/HU3IQ616ai #peerreview #resea…
RT @UlissesRocha13: Double blind reviews might be a solution! ' [Their] results indicate that unprofessional reviews likely have and will…
Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented groups in STEM (and probably many other disciplines and fields( https://t.co/cvciH2tXTP vía @thePeerJ
RT @EricTopol: Would be interesting to see the relationship between rude reviewers of science papers and nasty folks on @twitter https://t…
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
2119 days ago
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
.@sciencemagazine: Some #peerreviewers are rude & unprofessional, personally targeting a STEM researcher, not giving constructive criticism, or being harsh or cruel: https://t.co/dah0SfvOck . Study report on @thePeerJ: https://t.co/Y09uh36lI9