Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented groups in STEM

2123 days ago
Discrimination at work in peer review of grants and papers, read @thePeerJ "Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented groups in STEM" https://t.co/P6N2oSMY4V #WomenInScience https://t.co/HHosC4aEmE
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
RT @bethmlmorrison: "This paper is, simply, manure" - one of the kinder examples of the unprofessional reviews survey respondents received.…
RT @afadames: "... Traditionally #underrepresented groups in #STEM fields were most likely to perceive negative impacts on scientific aptit…
2123 days ago
RT @afadames: "... Traditionally #underrepresented groups in #STEM fields were most likely to perceive negative impacts on scientific aptit…
2123 days ago
RT @mbutler808: So important! - also in Tenure and Promotion Unprofessional peer reviews are harmful https://t.co/TCEzKMW3vJ via @thePeerJ
RT @bethmlmorrison: "This paper is, simply, manure" - one of the kinder examples of the unprofessional reviews survey respondents received.…
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
RT @bethmlmorrison: "This paper is, simply, manure" - one of the kinder examples of the unprofessional reviews survey respondents received.…
RT @bethmlmorrison: "This paper is, simply, manure" - one of the kinder examples of the unprofessional reviews survey respondents received.…
2123 days ago
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
2123 days ago
RT @EricTopol: Would be interesting to see the relationship between rude reviewers of science papers and nasty folks on @twitter https://t…
2123 days ago
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
2123 days ago
RT @afadames: "... Traditionally #underrepresented groups in #STEM fields were most likely to perceive negative impacts on scientific aptit…
RT @afadames: "... Traditionally #underrepresented groups in #STEM fields were most likely to perceive negative impacts on scientific aptit…
2123 days ago
RT @afadames: "... Traditionally #underrepresented groups in #STEM fields were most likely to perceive negative impacts on scientific aptit…
"... Traditionally #underrepresented groups in #STEM fields were most likely to perceive negative impacts on scientific aptitude, productivity, and career advancement after receiving an unprofessional #peerreview" via @thePeerJ https://t.co/t1MKXSfGz6
2123 days ago
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
2123 days ago
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
RT @EricTopol: Would be interesting to see the relationship between rude reviewers of science papers and nasty folks on @twitter https://t…
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
RT @bethmlmorrison: "This paper is, simply, manure" - one of the kinder examples of the unprofessional reviews survey respondents received.…
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…