Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented groups in STEM

RT @tcyronak: Important article. What the authors call ‘mean spirited or cruel’ review comments (see Fig. 1) are completely unacceptable, a…
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
2122 days ago
RT @aussiastronomer: This behaviour is, simply, manure. https://t.co/PoIjnHjJ23
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
This behaviour is, simply, manure. https://t.co/PoIjnHjJ23
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
https://t.co/YoobVq7gFE
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
RT @AwisFau: Discrimination at work in peer review of grants and papers, read @thePeerJ "Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately har…
Unprofessional peer reviews are harmful, esp. to traditionally underrepresented groups in STEM fields. Negative impacts on scientific aptitude, productivity, & career advancement after an unprofessional peer review. https://t.co/SHFCRC2n5V via @thePeerJ
2122 days ago
RT @afadames: "... Traditionally #underrepresented groups in #STEM fields were most likely to perceive negative impacts on scientific aptit…
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
2122 days ago
RT @afadames: "... Traditionally #underrepresented groups in #STEM fields were most likely to perceive negative impacts on scientific aptit…
2122 days ago
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
2122 days ago
RT @sashagreenspan: Unprofessional peer reviews are harmful https://t.co/8WjO084T6y via @thePeerJ
RT @JM_Archambault: Just look at the fields where these unprofessional reviews come from! >65% #ecology & #biology. I wasn't in the study,…
RT @EricTopol: Would be interesting to see the relationship between rude reviewers of science papers and nasty folks on @twitter https://t…
2122 days ago
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
2122 days ago
RT @choisy_marc: Unprofessional peer reviews are harmful https://t.co/NAF7ldgcK8 via @thePeerJ
RT @mbutler808: So important! - also in Tenure and Promotion Unprofessional peer reviews are harmful https://t.co/TCEzKMW3vJ via @thePeerJ