Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented groups in STEM

2129 days ago
RT @DrScranto: “This is a co-first authored paper with author order determined by ranking the most unprofessional peer reviews received by…
RT @phylogenomics: This is incredibly important for all in STEM: Unprofessional peer reviews are harmful https://t.co/cOoaLWz1IC via @thePe…
2129 days ago
RT @phylogenomics: This is incredibly important for all in STEM: Unprofessional peer reviews are harmful https://t.co/cOoaLWz1IC via @thePe…
RT @afadames: "... Traditionally #underrepresented groups in #STEM fields were most likely to perceive negative impacts on scientific aptit…
RT @phylogenomics: This is incredibly important for all in STEM: Unprofessional peer reviews are harmful https://t.co/cOoaLWz1IC via @thePe…
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
2129 days ago
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
2129 days ago
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
2129 days ago
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
2129 days ago
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
2129 days ago
RT @sashagreenspan: Unprofessional peer reviews are harmful https://t.co/8WjO084T6y via @thePeerJ
2129 days ago
RT @AwisFau: Discrimination at work in peer review of grants and papers, read @thePeerJ "Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately har…
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
https://t.co/uJiozQ5aXd
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
RT @aussiastronomer: This behaviour is, simply, manure. https://t.co/PoIjnHjJ23
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
RT @DrScranto: “This is a co-first authored paper with author order determined by ranking the most unprofessional peer reviews received by…
2129 days ago
RT @ASanchez_Tojar: Interesting read about rudeness in peer-review, and thoughts on how to get rid off it: Unprofessional peer reviews disp…