Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented groups in STEM

RT @EricTopol: Would be interesting to see the relationship between rude reviewers of science papers and nasty folks on @twitter https://t…
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
2132 days ago
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
2132 days ago
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
2132 days ago
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
2132 days ago
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
2132 days ago
RT @phylogenomics: This is incredibly important for all in STEM: Unprofessional peer reviews are harmful https://t.co/cOoaLWz1IC via @thePe…
2132 days ago
RT @KOKEdit: .@sciencemagazine: Some #peerreviewers are rude & unprofessional, personally targeting a STEM researcher, not giving construct…
2132 days ago
RT @phylogenomics: This is incredibly important for all in STEM: Unprofessional peer reviews are harmful https://t.co/cOoaLWz1IC via @thePe…
RT @phylogenomics: This is incredibly important for all in STEM: Unprofessional peer reviews are harmful https://t.co/cOoaLWz1IC via @thePe…
RT @ASanchez_Tojar: Interesting read about rudeness in peer-review, and thoughts on how to get rid off it: Unprofessional peer reviews disp…
RT @ASanchez_Tojar: Interesting read about rudeness in peer-review, and thoughts on how to get rid off it: Unprofessional peer reviews disp…
RT @phylogenomics: This is incredibly important for all in STEM: Unprofessional peer reviews are harmful https://t.co/cOoaLWz1IC via @thePe…
2132 days ago
RT @phylogenomics: This is incredibly important for all in STEM: Unprofessional peer reviews are harmful https://t.co/cOoaLWz1IC via @thePe…
RT @choisy_marc: Unprofessional peer reviews are harmful https://t.co/NAF7ldgcK8 via @thePeerJ
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
2132 days ago
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
2132 days ago
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…