Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented groups in STEM

2137 days ago
RT @Awasthi_Janak: Underrepresented groups in STEM fields are most likely to receive an unprofessional peer review. Anyone with such experi…
RT @Awasthi_Janak: Underrepresented groups in STEM fields are most likely to receive an unprofessional peer review. Anyone with such experi…
2137 days ago
Unprofessional peer reviews are harmful https://t.co/8UGLMMwnHO käyttäjältä @thePeerJ
RT @Awasthi_Janak: Underrepresented groups in STEM fields are most likely to receive an unprofessional peer review. Anyone with such experi…
RT @Awasthi_Janak: Underrepresented groups in STEM fields are most likely to receive an unprofessional peer review. Anyone with such experi…
RT @Awasthi_Janak: Underrepresented groups in STEM fields are most likely to receive an unprofessional peer review. Anyone with such experi…
Underrepresented groups in STEM fields are most likely to receive an unprofessional peer review. Anyone with such experiences? #AcademicChatter https://t.co/0OXHcUAUcB
RT @leticiakawano: This is incredibly important for all in #STEM: Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented grou…
RT @PaulineProvini: Unprofessional peer #reviews are pervasive and disproportionately harm underrepresented groups in #STEM. Follow the go…
RT @PaulineProvini: Unprofessional peer #reviews are pervasive and disproportionately harm underrepresented groups in #STEM. Follow the go…
2137 days ago
RT @PaulineProvini: Unprofessional peer #reviews are pervasive and disproportionately harm underrepresented groups in #STEM. Follow the go…
2137 days ago
RT @leticiakawano: This is incredibly important for all in #STEM: Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented grou…
2137 days ago
RT @PaulineProvini: Unprofessional peer #reviews are pervasive and disproportionately harm underrepresented groups in #STEM. Follow the go…
Unprofessional peer #reviews are pervasive and disproportionately harm underrepresented groups in #STEM. Follow the golden rule
2137 days ago
@RLadiesFreiburg Some examples from https://t.co/wXlSp0OnAP https://t.co/idXaPuiNiZ
A collaborator once got a review almost identical to one of the ad hominae in Figure 1. Reading the comments I sent her a supportive email immediately - she must've felt devastated as a young PhD researcher just baby-stepping into "noble" science https://t.co/LwDXsXa8Ch @thePeerJ
2137 days ago
RT @leticiakawano: This is incredibly important for all in #STEM: Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented grou…
RT @danielskatz: Examples of unprofessional peer reviews from survey respondents, from "Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm…
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
RT @leticiakawano: This is incredibly important for all in #STEM: Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented grou…
RT @leticiakawano: This is incredibly important for all in #STEM: Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented grou…
RT @AwisFau: Discrimination at work in peer review of grants and papers, read @thePeerJ "Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately har…
RT @leticiakawano: This is incredibly important for all in #STEM: Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented grou…
RT @leticiakawano: This is incredibly important for all in #STEM: Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented grou…
2137 days ago
A reviewer once called one of my papers "subjective gastric testimony," but that's not even in the same ballpark as some of the examples collected here (see Fig. 1 of the study https://t.co/XUx7991NEy). Let's find a way to end this unprofessional behavior. https://t.co/UT8hLFeA9Q