Underrepresented groups in STEM fields are most likely to receive an unprofessional peer review. Anyone with such experiences? #AcademicChatter
https://t.co/0OXHcUAUcB
A collaborator once got a review almost identical to one of the ad hominae in Figure 1. Reading the comments I sent her a supportive email immediately - she must've felt devastated as a young PhD researcher just baby-stepping into "noble" science https://t.co/LwDXsXa8Ch @thePeerJ
A reviewer once called one of my papers "subjective gastric testimony," but that's not even in the same ballpark as some of the examples collected here (see Fig. 1 of the study https://t.co/XUx7991NEy). Let's find a way to end this unprofessional behavior. https://t.co/UT8hLFeA9Q