Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented groups in STEM

2231 days ago
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
The examples are absolutely horrible. Luckily, I have never seen such comments as an author, reviewer, or Editor. Editors must shield authors from such nonsense. Unprofessional peer reviews are harmful https://t.co/Wegph834Cs via @thePeerJ
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
2231 days ago
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
RT @phylogenomics: This is incredibly important for all in STEM: Unprofessional peer reviews are harmful https://t.co/cOoaLWz1IC via @thePe…
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
2231 days ago
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
RT @TropRiversLab: Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented groups in STEM [PeerJ] https://t.co/FofZhzw9Oc
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
I think more journals should make their reviews public (arguably, even for rejections). Nevertheless, even with current availability, the examples in Figure 1 definitely got my attention: https://t.co/vG47eNz9Nc
2231 days ago
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
RT @godelitsas: Unprofessional peer reviews are harmful https://t.co/4uNkNWRhqm via @thePeerJ
RT @phylogenomics: This is incredibly important for all in STEM: Unprofessional peer reviews are harmful https://t.co/cOoaLWz1IC via @thePe…
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
2231 days ago
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
2231 days ago
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
2231 days ago
RT @phylogenomics: This is incredibly important for all in STEM: Unprofessional peer reviews are harmful https://t.co/cOoaLWz1IC via @thePe…
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…