Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented groups in STEM

RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
RT @aweinstein46: “Women and nonbinary people were the most likely to report significant delays in productivity after receiving unprofessio…
2230 days ago
RT @adam_roddy: So glad to see this analysis on tone of peer review impacting career. We had a paper this year (led by woman of color) that…
“...a -ve perception of aptitude leads to lowered self-confidence, short-term disruptions in success and productivity and delays in career advancement....” https://t.co/7YkrTGYOqi
RT @Psephenus: Bottom line, as a reviewer you should always be constructive, never emotional. A great study on the repercussion of unprofes…
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
2230 days ago
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
RT @Psephenus: Bottom line, as a reviewer you should always be constructive, never emotional. A great study on the repercussion of unprofes…
RT @Psephenus: Bottom line, as a reviewer you should always be constructive, never emotional. A great study on the repercussion of unprofes…
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
RT @adam_roddy: So glad to see this analysis on tone of peer review impacting career. We had a paper this year (led by woman of color) that…
2230 days ago
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
RT @adam_roddy: So glad to see this analysis on tone of peer review impacting career. We had a paper this year (led by woman of color) that…
RT @Psephenus: Bottom line, as a reviewer you should always be constructive, never emotional. A great study on the repercussion of unprofes…
RT @Psephenus: Bottom line, as a reviewer you should always be constructive, never emotional. A great study on the repercussion of unprofes…
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
RT @jessvickruck: "Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented groups in STEM" https://t.co/vBzRLCYQir Actual c…
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…
RT @Psephenus: Bottom line, as a reviewer you should always be constructive, never emotional. A great study on the repercussion of unprofes…
RT @Psephenus: Bottom line, as a reviewer you should always be constructive, never emotional. A great study on the repercussion of unprofes…
RT @DeepaAgashe: The examples are absolutely horrible. Luckily, I have never seen such comments as an author, reviewer, or Editor. Editors…
RT @TrevorABranch: Rude reviewer comments on scientific papers disproportionately impact women, minorities, and other disadvantaged groups.…
RT @TropRiversLab: Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented groups in STEM [PeerJ] https://t.co/FofZhzw9Oc
RT @NSilbiger: New paper by @Amber_D_Stubler and myself shows that Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented gro…