@MalikaIhle @westwoodsam1 @sortecoevo @dom_roche @TimParker88 @DaipingWang @rose_odea Replicability: several #metaanalysis in eco & evo pointing at problems: https://t.co/2oLcMumYP7 & https://t.co/dIPiHsaObb, and for estimates of replicability rate see: https://t.co/ALamyn9lKT & https://t.co/CLC79A2AWX. Hope this helps.
@cowbirdlab @TimParker88 @ASanchez_Tojar V insightful 2019 study by @seedykelly : Rate and success of study replication in ecology and evolution
https://t.co/NHOtJHDAX9
@joacim_naslund @Mikejennions Yes. I believe @seedykelly is planning another paper further refining the terminology later this year. He also published a recent analysis of replications in E&E here: https://t.co/NHOtJHDAX9. We included notes about replication studies and fish life stages in the paper's ESM.
Replication of results is a vital part of science. Yet this review finds that <0.1% of ecology and evolutionary journals are trying to replicate something. That's a big YIKES from me.
https://t.co/ksTGllBtpE
From the abstract: "I found that approximately 0.023% of ecology and evolution studies are described by their authors as replications". But the sad thing is, we don't know if that number is relatively low or high. https://t.co/lWiWHoy7Cx