A surge of p-values between 0.041 and 0.049 in recent decades (but negative results are increasing rapidly too)

View article
2764 days ago
RT @matkomorowski: A surge in p-values between 0.041 and 0.049 in the last decades!!! p-hacking or publication bias ? #Statistics #research…
reply repost on X like
RT @matkomorowski: A surge in p-values between 0.041 and 0.049 in the last decades!!! p-hacking or publication bias ? #Statistics #research…
reply repost on X like
A surge in p-values between 0.041 and 0.049 in the last decades!!! p-hacking or publication bias ? #Statistics #research #UKCCRF18 via David Harrison @ICNARC @UKCCRGroup https://t.co/8ano1lFqKe https://t.co/82ZVm7dAQq
reply repost on X like
"A surge of p-values between 0.041 and 0.049 in recent decades (but negative results are increasing rapidly too)": even though there is pressure to have p<0.05 results, perhaps scientists are starting to publish "disappointing" results more? https://t.co/f0U8DP1hJx via @thePeerJ
reply repost on X like
RT @briandavidearp: A surge of p-values between 0.041 and 0.049 in recent decades (but negative results are increasing rapidly too) https:/…
reply repost on X like
RT @briandavidearp: A surge of p-values between 0.041 and 0.049 in recent decades (but negative results are increasing rapidly too) https:/…
reply repost on X like
RT @briandavidearp: A surge of p-values between 0.041 and 0.049 in recent decades (but negative results are increasing rapidly too) https:/…
reply repost on X like
RT @briandavidearp: A surge of p-values between 0.041 and 0.049 in recent decades (but negative results are increasing rapidly too) https:/…
reply repost on X like
RT @briandavidearp: A surge of p-values between 0.041 and 0.049 in recent decades (but negative results are increasing rapidly too) https:/…
reply repost on X like
RT @briandavidearp: A surge of p-values between 0.041 and 0.049 in recent decades (but negative results are increasing rapidly too) https:/…
reply repost on X like
RT @briandavidearp: A surge of p-values between 0.041 and 0.049 in recent decades (but negative results are increasing rapidly too) https:/…
reply repost on X like
3020 days ago
RT @briandavidearp: A surge of p-values between 0.041 and 0.049 in recent decades (but negative results are increasing rapidly too) https:/…
reply repost on X like
3020 days ago
RT @briandavidearp: A surge of p-values between 0.041 and 0.049 in recent decades (but negative results are increasing rapidly too) https:/…
reply repost on X like
RT @briandavidearp: A surge of p-values between 0.041 and 0.049 in recent decades (but negative results are increasing rapidly too) https:/…
reply repost on X like
RT @briandavidearp: A surge of p-values between 0.041 and 0.049 in recent decades (but negative results are increasing rapidly too) https:/…
reply repost on X like
RT @briandavidearp: A surge of p-values between 0.041 and 0.049 in recent decades (but negative results are increasing rapidly too) https:/…
reply repost on X like
RT @briandavidearp: A surge of p-values between 0.041 and 0.049 in recent decades (but negative results are increasing rapidly too) https:/…
reply repost on X like
RT @briandavidearp: A surge of p-values between 0.041 and 0.049 in recent decades (but negative results are increasing rapidly too) https:/…
reply repost on X like
3020 days ago
RT @briandavidearp: A surge of p-values between 0.041 and 0.049 in recent decades (but negative results are increasing rapidly too) https:/…
reply repost on X like
A surge of p-values between 0.041 and 0.049 in recent decades (but negative results are increasing rapidly too) https://t.co/KE9DDSY7l6 https://t.co/BzmahmdEcG
reply repost on X like