Citation sources

Updated weekly. Details via CrossRef
CrossRef Scopus Google Scholar
16 18 Search
2018
Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to?
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2018
Effect size and statistical power in the rodent fear conditioning literature – A systematic review
PLOS ONE
2018
P values in display items are ubiquitous and almost invariably significant: A survey of top science journals
PLOS ONE
2018
A 20-Year Review of Outcome Reporting Bias in Moderated Multiple Regression
Journal of Business and Psychology
2018
Trends in P Value, Confidence Interval, and Power Analysis Reporting in Health Professions Education Research Reports
Academic Medicine
2017
The earth is flat (p > 0.05): significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research
PeerJ
2017
Novel calcium infusion regimen after parathyroidectomy for renal hyperparathyroidism
Nephrology
2017
Too Good to be False: Nonsignificant Results Revisited
Collabra: Psychology
2017
Needle-like instruments for steering through solid organs: A review of the scientific and patent literature
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine
2016
Outcome Reporting Bias in Government-Sponsored Policy Evaluations: A Qualitative Content Analysis of 13 Studies
PLOS ONE
2016
Editorial: Evidence on Questionable Research Practices: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
Journal of Business and Psychology
2016
p-Curve and p-Hacking in Observational Research
PLOS ONE
2016
Distributions ofp-values smaller than .05 in psychology: what is going on?
PeerJ
2016
Significance bias: an empirical evaluation of the oral health literature
BMC Oral Health
2016
Problems in usingp-curve analysis and text-mining to detect rate ofp-hacking and evidential value
PeerJ
2015
On the challenges of drawing conclusions fromp-values just below 0.05
PeerJ
Additional cited-by details will be shown when available from CrossRef