Citation sources

Updated weekly. Details via Crossref
Crossref Scopus Google Scholar
37 40 Search
2024
Footprint of publication selection bias on meta‐analyses in medicine, environmental sciences, psychology, and economics
Research Synthesis Methods
2024
Can ChatGPT be used to predict citation counts, readership, and social media interaction? An exploration among 2222 scientific abstracts
Scientometrics
2023
Minimum false-positive risk of primary outcomes and impact of reducing nominal P-value threshold from 0.05 to 0.005 in anaesthesiology randomised clinical trials: a cross-sectional study
British Journal of Anaesthesia
2023
Open Science in Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine: A Statement From the Behavioral Medicine Research Council
Annals of Behavioral Medicine
2023
Fifty years of research on questionable research practises in science: quantitative analysis of co-citation patterns
Royal Society Open Science
2023
Is There Evidence of P-Hacking in Imaging Research?
Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal
2023
Open Science in Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine: A Statement From the Behavioral Medicine Research Council
Psychosomatic Medicine
2022
Preliminary Evidence for an Association between Journal Submission Requirements and Reproducibility of Published Findings: A Pilot Study
Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics
2022
Detecting p‐Hacking
Econometrica
2021
Providing Evidence for the Null Hypothesis in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Group-Level Bayesian Inference
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
2021
Increasing the reproducibility of research will reduce the problem of apophenia (and more)
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
2021
Scientific self-correction: the Bayesian way
Synthese
2021
International Encyclopedia of Transportation
2021
Statistical Inference and the Replication Crisis
Review of Philosophy and Psychology
2020
Identifying configurations of multiple co‐located clusters by analyzing within‐ and between‐cluster linkages
Growth and Change
2020
The Theory of Statistics in Psychology
2019
Additive manufacturing of medical instruments: A state-of-the-art review
Additive Manufacturing
2019
Research practices and statistical reporting quality in 250 economic psychology master's theses: a meta-research investigation
Royal Society Open Science
2019
A 20-Year Review of Outcome Reporting Bias in Moderated Multiple Regression
Journal of Business and Psychology
2018
Effect size and statistical power in the rodent fear conditioning literature – A systematic review
PLOS ONE
2018
P values in display items are ubiquitous and almost invariably significant: A survey of top science journals
PLOS ONE
2018
Effect Size Estimation Fromt-Statistics in the Presence of Publication Bias
Zeitschrift für Psychologie
2018
Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to?
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2018
Trends in P Value, Confidence Interval, and Power Analysis Reporting in Health Professions Education Research Reports: A Systematic Appraisal
Academic Medicine
2017
Novel calcium infusion regimen after parathyroidectomy for renal hyperparathyroidism
Nephrology
2017
Too Good to be False: Nonsignificant Results Revisited
Collabra: Psychology
2017
The earth is flat (p > 0.05): significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research
PeerJ
2017
Needle-like instruments for steering through solid organs: A review of the scientific and patent literature
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine
2016
Editorial: Evidence on Questionable Research Practices: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
Journal of Business and Psychology
2016
Problems in usingp-curve analysis and text-mining to detect rate ofp-hacking and evidential value
PeerJ
2016
Significance bias: an empirical evaluation of the oral health literature
BMC Oral Health
2016
Distributions ofp-values smaller than .05 in psychology: what is going on?
PeerJ
2016
p-Curve and p-Hacking in Observational Research
PLOS ONE
2016
Outcome Reporting Bias in Government-Sponsored Policy Evaluations: A Qualitative Content Analysis of 13 Studies
PLOS ONE
2015
On the challenges of drawing conclusions fromp-values just below 0.05
PeerJ
Additional cited-by details will be shown when available from Crossref