Review History

All reviews of published articles are made public. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials. Note: This was optional for articles submitted before 13 February 2023.

Peer reviewers are encouraged (but not required) to provide their names to the authors when submitting their peer review. If they agree to provide their name, then their personal profile page will reflect a public acknowledgment that they performed a review (even if the article is rejected). If the article is accepted, then reviewers who provided their name will be associated with the article itself.

View examples of open peer review.

Summary

  • The initial submission of this article was received on July 29th, 2014 and was peer-reviewed by 1 reviewer and the Academic Editor.
  • The Academic Editor made their initial decision on August 18th, 2014.
  • The first revision was submitted on September 26th, 2014 and was reviewed by the Academic Editor.
  • The article was Accepted by the Academic Editor on October 1st, 2014.

Version 0.2 (accepted)

· Oct 1, 2014 · Academic Editor

Accept

The revisions were all done well and I'm pleased to recommend acceptance.

External reviews were received for this submission. These reviews were used by the Editor when they made their decision, and can be downloaded below.
Download author's response letter Download external reviews - submitted Sep 26, 2014

Version 0.1 (original submission)

· Aug 18, 2014 · Academic Editor

Minor Revisions

The manuscript was sent to one of the original reviewers who was pleased with the way you handled the revisions. Just some very minor revisions left.

·

Basic reporting

No comments

Experimental design

No comments

Validity of the findings

No comments

Additional comments

I think the changes in focus and tone in response to the reviews from Axios were well done and I had no major comments on the revised manuscript.
abstract "past noted"?
7-8 the pool of genetic variation can be increased through introductions from multiple sources.
87+92 "1970's"?

Cite this review as
External reviews were received for this submission. These reviews were used by the Editor when they made their decision, and can be downloaded below.
Download external reviews - submitted Jul 29, 2014

All text and materials provided via this peer-review history page are made available under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.