Of all the genera of fossil marine adapted turtle recovered from the Late Cretaceous of North America, perhaps one of the poorest known is Prionochelys Zangerl, 1953. Prionochelys or the ‘saw-tooth turtle’ is a spectacularly ornamented sea turtle characterized by pronounced peripheral serrations and an undulating sagittal keel along the dorsal midline of the carapace. As a result of the largely incomplete holotype specimens for the various species of Prionochelys and the limited amount of historically referred material, the precise morphology of Prionochelys has been essentially speculative despite the frequent usage of Prionochelys reconstructions in natural history museum exhibits. The lack of information available for this genus has also lead to confusion regarding the taxonomy of Prionochelys. Zangerl (1953) initially described three species of Prionochelys based on minor differences in neural arrangements and the geographic location each species was discovered: P. matutina Zangerl, 1953 from the Mooreville Chalk of Alabama, P. nauta Zangerl, 1953 from the Marlbrook Marl of Arkansas, and P. galeotergum Zangerl, 1953 from the Niobrara Formation of Kansas. Nearly 50 years later, Hirayama (1997) postulated that P. galeotergum and P. matutina were junior synonyms of P. nauta but did not provide any justification for this systematic revision. This assessment is not supported here. Hirayama also hypothesized that Prionochelys was closely related to Peritresius Leidy, 1856 and Ctenochelys Zangerl, 1953 based on the presence of epithecal ossifications dorsal to the neuralia (epineurals). Until now, this evolutionary relationship has never been explicitly tested within a phylogenetic context owing primarily to the lack of available anatomical information for species of Prionochelys.
One of the purposes of this study is to describe newly identified material belonging to Prionochelys from the collections at McWane Science Center in Birmingham, Alabama, USA and the Alabama Museum of Natural History in Tuscaloosa, Alabama, USA. The cranial material associated with MSC 39030 represents the most complete skull yet identified for any species of Prionochelys and allows for the first detailed description and comparison of Prionochelys cranial elements with those of other closely related Cretaceous marine turtles. MSC 3500 is only the second definitively juvenile individual of Prionochelys to be identified and by far the most complete juvenile known. This specimen provides the opportunity to examine ontogenetic variation within the genus. ALMNH 6673 is the first material of Prionochelys nauta discovered outside of Arkansas and is the oldest occurrence of the species. Collectively, the specimens referenced herein help to elucidate the morphology of Prionochelys thereby allowing for the first comprehensive investigation into the taxonomy and cladistic affinities of this poorly known member of Pan-Cheloniidae (sensu Joyce, Parham & Gauthier, 2004).
Material and Methods
Localities and geological setting
The Prionochelys matutina specimens identified in this study were collected from multiple sites from two upper Cretaceous formations in Alabama, USA (Fig. 1, Table 1). The majority of the specimens were recovered from the Upper Cretaceous Mooreville Chalk which spans the upper Santonian in the central part of Alabama to middle Campanian at the western edge of the state (Fig. 2; Puckett, 1994; Mancini, Puckett & Tew, 1996; Liu, 2007). The Mooreville Chalk has been interpreted to represent a middle neritic to nearshore environment (Raymond et al., 1988; Puckett, 1992). Only a single specimen (AHl-1) was recovered from the middle Santonian to lower Campanian Tombigbee Sand Member of the Eutaw Formation. The Tombigbee Sand Member is interpreted as being a middle neritic environment based on the presence of numerous burrows and mollusk shells (Raymond et al., 1988; Puckett, 2005).
Within this study, all localities are referenced by standard Alabama and Mississippi site file numbers. All cited localities are located on private property; however, permission was obtained by MSC to collect at these locations. Precise locality information for each specimen, though not provided here, is on file at MSC and fully available to qualified researchers.
The Prionochelys specimens described in this study are from the collections housed at the McWane Science Center (MSC) in Birmingham, Alabama, USA and the Alabama Museum of Natural History (ALMNH) in Tuscaloosa, Alabama, USA (Table S1). Specimens were prepared and cleaned using manual preparation techniques and water. When necessary, broken elements were repaired using B-76 butvar. The specimens were photographed using a Nikon D3300 camera and images were processed using Adobe Photoshop version 2014 software as part of the production of the figures. Osteological terminology pertaining to the skull primarily follows that of Gaffney (1972), but includes recent adjustments to the terminology concerning the pathways and foramina of the carotid arteries (Rabi et al., 2013). Postcranial osteological terminology follows Zangerl (1953).
|Campanian||Mooreville Chalk||Compact fossiliferous clayey chalk and chalky marl||Inner to middle neritic environments below the wave base||AGr-37||Greene||AL||P. matutina: MSC 3500|
|AGr-29||Greene||AL||P. matutina: MSC 2720|
|AGr-27||Greene||AL||P. matutina: MSC 2610|
|AGr-17||Greene||AL||P. matutina: MSC 6086|
|AGr-9||Greene||AL||P. matutina: MSC 5626|
|AGr-7||Greene||AL||P. matutina: MSC 39013, MSC 3036, MSC 1719|
|AGr-5||Greene||AL||P. matutina: MSC 1915, MSC 2045,MSC 39030|
|ADa-3||Greene||AL||P. matutina: MSC 38604, MSC 3140|
|APn-1||Pickens||AL||P. matutina: MSC 1540|
|Sant.||Eutaw Formation-Tombigbee Sand Member||Loosely compacted, fossiliferous sandy clay||Inner to middle neritic environments below the wave base||AHl-1||Hale||AL||P. matutina: MSC 2250|
The cladistic affinities of P. matutina were tested within a phylogenetic framework using a modified version of the Cadena & Parham (2015) matrix (Files S1 & S2). The matrix consists of 257 characters scored for 28 species and was altered to include recent character adjustments for Toxochelys latiremis Cope, 1873, Ctenochelys stenoporus (Hay, 1905), and Ctenochelys acris Zangerl, 1953 (Gentry, 2016). Scorings for Peritresius spp. come from Gentry et al. (2018). One new binary state character was added regarding the presence/absence of epineural ossifications (ch. 127), an apomorphy of at least three genera of Cretaceous pan-cheloniid (Ctenochelys Zangerl, 1953, Peritresius Leidy, 1856, and Prionochelys). Parsimony analyses were performed using the software PAUP* version 4.0a (build 163) and the heuristic search algorithm. This process was followed by Tree Bisection Reconnection (TBR) branch swapping (saving 10 trees per replication). Trees were constrained using a molecular constraint tree of extant taxa (Crawford et al., 2014; File S3). Support for each node was calculated using the bootstrap resampling method. The 37 ordered characters from the Cadena & Parham (2015) matrix were also used in the present study. Terminal operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were limited to individual species. Phylogenetic nomenclature and definitions follow Joyce (2007) and Joyce et al. (2013). Numbers in parentheses refer to characters used in the phylogenetic analyses and their corresponding scores.
New Specimens of Prionochelys Matutina
Referred material MSC 3500, MSC 6086, MSC 3036, MSC 2720, MSC 1915, MSC 39030, MSC 39013, MSC 38604, MSC 2610, MSC 2045, MSC 3140, MSC 1719, MSC 5626.
Horizon and locality Greene County, Alabama. Mooreville Chalk Formation, Lower Campanian. Pickens County, Alabama. Mooreville Chalk Formation, Lower Campanian. Hale County, Alabama. Eutaw Formation, Tombigbee Sand Member, Middle Santonian-Lower Campanian.
The skull associated with MSC 39030 (Fig. 4) is the first known cranial material of Prionochelys matutina. The supraoccipital crest and the anterior portions of the pterygoids are missing so it is impossible to determine an exact length for the skull but it is estimated at approximately 12 cm. The width of the skull is roughly 9.5 cm. The skull has a broadly rounded anterior margin though not as broad as that of Ctenochelys acris (Gentry, 2016; RMM 6157, fig. 4, p. 6) and not as pointed as Ctenochelys stenoporus (Zangerl, 1953) or Toxochelys latiremis (Matzke, 2009; USNM 18252, text-fig. 1, p. 99). The skull roof is missing from MSC 39030 and these elements remain unknown for the species.
Palatal elements The premaxilla contacts the maxilla laterally and the vomer posteriorly. Ventrally the premaxilla forms the anterior part of the upper triturating surface and along its anterior margin, exhibits a ventrally oriented labial ridge similar to the ridge seen in both Toxochelys and Ctenochelys. Dorsally the premaxilla contributes to floor of the apertura narium externa (ch. 36/0). Both maxillae are nearly intact and form the anterolateral edge of the skull. The maxilla contacts the premaxilla anteriorly, the vomer anteromedially, and the palatine medially. The posterior contacts of the maxilla cannot be determined. Dorsally the maxilla floors the fossa orbitalis and anteriorly forms the lateral margin of the apertura narium externa. In ventral view, the maxilla serves as the majority of the upper triturating surface and is moderately dorsally concave. The labial ridge of the maxilla is pronounced and diminishes in height posteriorly (ch. 42/0). The palatine is sutured with the vomer and maxilla in ventral view. The lateral edge of the palatine is sutured to the maxilla and forms a relatively small portion of the triturating surface (ch. 39/0). The degree of contribution from the palatine to the triturating surface is slightly greater than that of Toxochelys latiremis (Matzke, 2009; USNM 11639, text-fig. 5, p. 105) and is comparable to that of Ctenochelys acris (Gentry, 2016; RMM 6157, fig. 4, p. 6). The vomer is only partially preserved but there is enough of the element to determine that it contacted the premaxilla anteriorly (ch. 47/0), the maxilla laterally, and the palatine posterolaterally. Ventrally, it appears as though the vomer contributed significantly to the upper triturating surface (ch. 51/1). The curved posteromedial margin of the preserved section of the vomer is interpreted here as being the anterior margin of the foramen orbito-nasale. Anteroventrally, the lateral most extensions of the vomer are similar to those found in certain specimens of Toxochelys latiremis (Matzke, 2009; AMNH 5118, text-fig. 2, p. 101).
Palatoquadrate elements Both quadrates are completely preserved with MSC 39030 (Fig. 4). In dorsal view, the quadrate contacts the quadratojugal anterolaterally, the squamosal posteriorly, the opisthotic posteromedially, and the prootic medially. The quadrate fully encloses the anterior perimeter of the antrum postoticum (ch. 55/2) and forms the majority of the processus trochlearis oticum (ch. 57/2, ch. 58/0). Ventrally the quadrate contacts the pterygoid medially, the opisthotic posteromedially, and the squamosal posterolaterally (ch. 59/0). The medial lobe of the condylus madibularis is slightly larger than the lateral lobe, similar to the condition observed in Ctenochelys acris (Gentry, 2016; RMM 6157, fig. 4, p. 6) and adult specimens of Toxochelys latiremis (Matzke, 2009; AMNH 1042, text-fig. 8, p. 110).
Both pterygoids are nearly intact and in ventral view, contact the quadrate posterolaterally, the exoccipital (ch. 70/1) and basioccipital (ch. 64/1) posteriorly, and the basisphenoid posteromedially. Though badly worn, the sagittal ridge present in some Cretaceous pan-chelonioids along the medial suture of the pterygoids appears to be highly diminished or absent in Prionochelys matutina (ch. 74/0). The pterygoid extends posteriorly almost to the level of the mandibular condyle but does not actually contact the medial edge of the condyle (ch. 75/0). The dorsal surface of the pterygoid is largely obscured by the prootic and quadrate but beginning at the level of the anterior most point of the basisphenoid and running posteriorly along the sulcus cavernosus is the laminar epipterygoid (ch. 60/1).
Braincase elements The prootic contacts the supraoccipital posteromedially, the opisthotic posteriorly, and the quadrate laterally. The dorsal exposure of the prootic of Prionochelys matutina is relatively large (ch. 82/0) and the prootic contributes only slightly to the medial part of the processus trochlearis oticum. In ventral view, the prootic is almost entirely covered by the wing shaped posterolateral expansion of the pterygoid (ch. 52/2). The medial wall of the dorsally oriented foramen stapedio-temporale (ch. 95/0) and the associated medial groove are formed entirely by the prootic (Fig. 4B). The prootic covers much of the dorsal exposure of the basisphenoid however, enough of the basisphenoid is visible to discern several important features including the presence of a thick, rod-like rostrum basisphenoidale (ch. 86/1) and the close association between the two large foramina anterius canalis carotici cerebralis (ch. 92/1). In ventral view, the basisphenoid is an anteriorly oriented triangle that tapers at the posteromedial contact of the pterygoids. A prominent C-shaped crest is present immediately anterior to the concave suture between the basisphenoid and basioccipital (ch. 88/1). The basioccipital extends posteriorly to the occipital condyle in ventral view but forms only the medial 1/3rd of the condyle. The remaining portions of the condyle are formed by posteroventral extensions of the exoccipitals (Fig. 4D). The two foramina nervi hypoglossi are present on the posteriorly oriented facet of the exoccipitals and are exposed in ventral view (ch. 98/0). The exoccipitals floor the foramen magnum in dorsal view but do not meet dorsally.
Carotid and palatine arteries The internal carotid artery enters the braincase via the foramen posterius canalis carotici interni (fpcci) and runs along the pterygoid in the canalis carotici interni before splitting into the cerebral and palatine branches (ch. 99/2) similar to the condition observed in other Cretaceous and Paleocene pan-cheloniids (Matzke, 2009; Gentry, 2016; Myers et al., 2018). The fpcci is formed entirely by the pterygoid (ch. 100/1). The cerebral branch exits the braincase through the foramen anterius canalis carotici interni on the dorsal surface of the basisphenoid posterior to the rostrum basisphenoidale and anterior to the dorsum sellae. The ventral surface of the pterygoid is badly worn and the relative size and position of the foramen posterius canalis carotici palatinum cannot be determined.
Carapace The carapace of P. matutina is strongly cordiform and exhibits the distinctively keeled neural series (Fig. 5; ch. 116/3) and extensively serrated peripherals characteristic of the genus. P. matutina is estimated as having a maximum carapace length (MCL) >80 cm based on the estimated total carapace length of the largest known specimen, MSC 39013 (Fig. 6). The anterior margin of the carapace is deeply embayed and the majority of the contribution to this embayment comes from the anterior edge of the nuchal with additional minor contributions from the left and right first peripherals. The posterior margin of the carapace is notched at the pygal with considerable intraspecific variation in the depth and general conformation of this feature.
Peripherals The highly serrated posterior peripherals characteristic of Prionochelys spp. are easily distinguished from those of other closely related Cretaceous pan-cheloniids (i.e., Ctenochelys spp. and Peritresius spp.) by the sharply pointed ‘blade’ formed by the anterolateral edges of peripherals 6–11 (Figs. 3F, 5A, 6C). There does not appear to be a much ontogenetic variation in the development of the serration as the peripherals of both the smallest (MSC 3500, Fig. 7) and largest (MSC 39013, Fig. 6) individuals are equally serrated. The first peripheral of P. matutina is markedly different from that of P. nauta with the latter being considerably wider and sector shaped. The second peripheral of P. nauta is wider than long, at least in the case of P27454 (Zangerl, 1953; fig. 115, p. 251), as opposed to the second peripheral of P. matutina which is much longer than wide. Peripherals 3–11 of Prionochelys matutina gradually increase in size and in some of the larger individuals, peripheral 11 can be wider than long (Fig. 6C).
Nuchal The nuchal of P. matutina is nearly three times wider than long (ch. 122/0) and near the posteromedial edge of the ventral surface possesses a raised, elongate pedestal which presumably articulated with the neural spine of the eighth cervical vertebra (ch. 120/2). The posteromedial border of the nuchal shows the same well-developed postnuchal (suprascapular) fontanelles (ch. 123/1; Figs. 6–8) also found in several additional species of Late Cretaceous pan-chelonioid (Toxochelys latiremis, Ctenochelys spp.). Zangerl (1953) described Prionochelys as lacking postnuchal fontanelles and did not include them in his reconstruction of P. nauta (Zangerl, 1953, fig. 116, p. 252) though it should be noted that the nuchal of P. nauta is unknown. One of the only currently known specimens of P. nauta, P26238, does have a nearly intact preneural whose left and right anterolateral margins seem to show evidence of paired embayments possibly indicative of postnuchal fontanelles (Zangerl, 1953, pl. 28). Both juvenile (MSC 3500, Fig. 7) and large adult (MSC 1540, Fig. 8) specimens of Prionochelys matutina possess postnuchal fontanelles so this feature is not interpreted as being ontogenetically variable.
Neurals and epineurals Preserved with MSC 3036 is the first complete neural series described for any species of Prionochelys. The series consists of one preneural, eight neurals, and three epithecal ossifications (epineurals) located at the junctions of neurals 2–3, 4–5, and 6–7 (ch. 126/1, ch. 127/1; Fig. 5D). Zangerl described Prionochelys as having nine neurals, not including the preneural, but none of the currently recognized specimens of Prionochelys spp. have more than eight. The neurals and epineurals of P. matutina exhibit the same undulating midsagittal keel seen in both Marlbook Marl and Niobrara Prionochelys material (ch. 127/1). The keeled preneural of P. matutina lacks the epineural and anterolateral ‘wings’ thought to be present on the preneural of P. nauta (Zangerl, 1953, fig. 114, p. 250) and more closely resembles the preneural of Ctenochelys acris Zangerl, 1953 (Zangerl, 1953, fig. 112, p. 244). Based on the arrangement of the neural/epineural series of MSC 3036, it is possible that due to very incomplete nature of previously referred specimens of Prionochelys nauta and the inherent difficulty in accurately reconstructing an organism based on such partial remains, the broadly flared preneural and cervical elevation originally figured for Prionochelys nauta (Zangerl, 1953; FMNH P26237, fig. 114, p. 250) are, in fact, the nearly triangular 8th neural and the anterior-most portion of the anal elevation found in both Prionochelys matutina (Fig. 5D) and Ctenochelys stenoporus (Matzke, 2007; USNM 357166, text-fig. 12, p 683). More complete specimens of P. nauta are needed to confirm this supposition.
The pectoral elevation of Prionochelys matutina is formed by neurals 3–5 and by two epineurals (Fig. 5D). The presence of this second epineural at the pinnacle of the pectoral elevation is a potential autopomorphy of Prionochelys matutina and is not exhibited by any other species of pan-cheloniid that possesses epineurals.
Costals The costal plates of P. matutina are highly reduced resulting in the exposure of the distal rib ends of every costal (ch. 133/3). The costal fontanelles of P. matutina are more than 50% of the width of the adjacent costals even in the larger adult specimens (Figs. 5A and 6C) so it is presumable that at no point during this species’ ontogeny does it show the degree of ossification found in larger individuals of P. nauta (Zangerl, 1953, fig. 116, p. 252 & pl. 27). The rib end of the first costal inserts into peripheral three, the second costal into peripheral four, and so on until the 10th peripheral which receives the distal rib end of the eighth costal. There is no insertion point visible on the medial facet of the 11th peripheral creating rib-free peripherals anterior and posterior to the costals (ch. 134/0).
Pygal and suprapygals Zangerl (1953) originally described Prionochelys spp. as having either a single suprapygal or none at all and hypothesized that in Prionochelys matutina, the suprapygal had essentially assumed the position and shape of the ninth neural found in other Cretaceous marine turtles. MSC 3036 clearly possesses two suprapygals (ch. 138/1) with the first suprapygal being the larger of the two (ch. 139/1, Fig. 5). The laterally expanded anterior half of the first suprapygal is sutured to the posterior margin of the triangular 8th neural similar to the arrangement of these elements in the type specimen of Prionochelys galeotergum (Zangerl, 1953; PR 125, fig. 121, p. 259). Covering much of the dorsal surface of both suprapygals of MSC 3036 is an episuprapygal that extends posteriorly nearly to the junction of the second suprapygal and pygal (Fig. 5D). The apex of the episuprapygal is more pointed and dorsally elevated than that of Ctenochelys stenoporus (Matzke, 2007; text-fig. 13B, p. 685) and Peritresius ornatus (Baird, 1964; NJSM 11051, fig. 5, p. 16). There is considerable variation among referred Prionochelys specimens in the degree to which the posterior margin of the pygal is excavated however, Prionochelys pygals are all deeply notched posteriorly (ch. 141/0).
Plastron The plastron associated with MSC 3500 is the most complete Prionochelys matutina plastron yet described and the first juvenile plastron identified for any species of Prionochelys (Fig. 7A). The length of the plastron in nearly double the width and the general arrangement of the plastral elements closely conforms to the pattern observed in other Cretaceous pan-cheloniids in having proportionally diminutive, medially sutured epiplastra anterior to the entoplastron (ch. 161/1), well-developed lateral and central plastral fontanelles (ch. 150/1) created by a reduction in the width of the hyo-hypoplastral suture (ch. 154/1), and narrow, elongate xiphiplastra (ch. 170/2) with S-shaped lateral margins. The axillary process of the hyoplastron appears to have slightly contacted the carapace (ch. 163/0) near the level of the 4th peripheral (ch. 164/2) and does not extend anteriorly beyond the margin of the anteromedial process of the plastron. The inguinal process of the hypoplastron also seems to have slightly contacted the peripherals (ch. 167/0) near or at the level of the 7th peripheral (ch. 168/1). Distinct knobs are present on the ventral surface of the hyo-, hypo-, and xiphiplastra in virtually identical locations to those found in Ctenochelys stenoporus (Matzke, 2007; USNM 357166, text-fig. 13, p. 685).
Pectoral girdle The right half of the shoulder girdle is preserved with MSC 1540 and represents the first scapula, coracoid, and humerus described for this genus (Figs. 8B–8D). The angle formed by the acromial and scapular prongs of the scapula is approximately 110–115° (ch. 220/1) making it nearly equivalent to the angle found in Ctenochelys stenoporus (Matzke, 2007; USNM 357166, text-fig. 14, p. 686) and Ctenochelys acris (Gentry, 2016; MSC 35085, fig. 8, p. 13). Only the base of the scapular process is present but the acromial process is intact and has a length of 6.8 cm. There is a clear glenoid neck (ch. 218/1) but it is somewhat reduced compared to the same feature of Toxochelys spp. or Ctenochelys acris. The coracoid is the same length as the humerus (ch. 221/1) and is interpreted here as being 7.6 cm long with a posteromedial plate that measures 4.6 cm across. The coracoid of Prionochelys matutina is relatively shorter than any other species of Cretaceous pan-cheloniid. The posteromedial plate of the coracoid of P. matutina is proportionally larger than Ctenochelys stenoporus or Toxochelys latiremis with the minimal width of the coracoid diaphysis (1.0 cm) contained 4.6 times in the maximum width of the posteromedial plate. In Toxochelys latiremis (Zangerl, 1953), the comparable value is 3.6 and is almost ∼4.0 for Ctenochelys stenoporus (Matzke, 2007). The proportions of the coracoid of P. matutina are much closer to those of Toxochelys moorevillensis (Zangerl, 1953; FMNH PR136, p. 191) with its comparable value of 4.8 and Ctenochelys acris (Gentry, 2016; fig. 8, p. 13) where the minimal width of the coracoid diaphysis is contained nearly 5 times in the width of the posteromedial plate.
Humerus The humerus of MSC 1540 is completely preserved and is 7.5 cm in length (Fig. 8B, 8G–8J). The proximal end of the humerus is 4.7 cm wide (ch. 244/0). The medial process extends laterally further from the sagittal diaphyseal midline than the same feature of Ctenochelys stenoporus (Matzke, 2007; USNM 357166, text-fig. 14, p. 686), the most closely related pan-cheloniid for which the humerus is known. The medial process is much larger than the lateral one. The rounded lateral process of the humerus of P. matutina (ch. 240/0) is located only slightly distal to the proximal articular surface (ch. 238/1).
Pelvis The pelvic elements of Prionochelys matutina are largely indistinguishable from the same elements of Ctenochelys stenoporus (Matzke, 2007; USNM 357166, text-fig. 15, p. 686) with only a few notable exceptions. The thyroid fenestra is coalescent (ch. 225/0) and shows no indication of even a partial subdivision by the medial processes of the pubes or ischia (Fig. 5C). The elongate iliac neck (ch. 226/1) is slightly shorter than that of Ctenochelys stenoporus but without a larger sample size of pelvic elements belonging to both species, it is difficult to determine how much of this difference may be due to interspecific or intraspecific variation. The prominent lateral process of the pubis is flat (ch. 231/1) and extends anteriorly to the level of the anterior margin of the medial pubic process. This is in contrast to Ctenochelys stenoporus where the medial pubic process extends anteriorly beyond the level of the lateral process. The metischial process of the ischium is present (ch. 234/1) and appears to have reached further posteriorly than the metischial process of Ctenochelys stenoporus.
Vertebrae A single cervical vertebra is preserved with MSC 39013 and represents the first vertebrae of any kind described for Prionochelys (Fig. 6A). The transverse processes are located near the anterior end of the centrum (ch. 187/1) and a distinct ventral keel is present (ch. 188/1) spanning nearly the full length of the centrum. The prezygophyses extend anteriorly beyond the level of the anterior margin of the centrum. Both postzygophyses are missing. The vertebra is clearly procoelous (ch. 191/1) and though the vertebra is badly worn, there appear to have been two distinct articular surfaces on the anterior central articulation and although it is unclear exactly which cervical vertebra this would have been (1–8), this feature does indicate the presence of a double articulation at some point in the cervical series.
Ontogeny of Prionochelys
Ontogenetic variation is virtually unknown for species of fossil chelonioid due primarily to a lack of described juvenile specimens for many species. MSC 3500 represents the first formally described juvenile of P. matutina and one of only three described juvenile Cretaceous pan-chelonioid specimens (Zangerl, 1953; KUVP 1244, pl. 21, p. 164; Matzke, 2007; USNM 357166, text-figs. 1–15). The general conformation of the carapace of MSC 3500 (Fig. 7B) compares closely to that of adult specimens of P. matutina (Fig. 9). The adult nuchal emargination is considerably more deeply embayed and the width of the contact between the nuchal and first peripheral is much greater in adult specimens. Peripherals 4–8 are always longer than wide in both adults and juveniles, however, it appears that in juvenile and sub-adult individuals, these elements primarily increased in length (Fig. 10A) until the individual reached a certain age at which point the peripherals increased more in width than in length (Figs. 10B and 10C). This increase in the width of the peripherals seems to continue throughout the life of the animal and in the largest specimens reported here, the width of peripheral l1 actually exceeds its length (Fig. 10C).
The plastral fontanelles of P. matutina appear to decrease in size during growth. The smallest currently known juvenile (MSC 3500) possesses a central plastral fontanelle whose length is equal to that of the hyo-hypoplastral contact. In the largest adult specimen where this feature is preserved (MSC 1540), the length of the central plastral fontanelle is only ∼65% of the width of this contact. In contrast with the plastral fontanelles, the postnuchal fontanelles either stay proportionally equivalent or slightly increase in size during ontogeny. Unlike Matzke (2007) observations of Ctenochelys stenoporus, the lateral carapacial fontanelles of P. matutina do not decrease in size during growth given that the proportions of these features in both adults and juveniles seem to be nearly equivalent. There do not appear to be any other significant ontogenetic changes in the proportions of the plastron or carapace, however more complete juvenile specimens may reveal additional ontogenetic variation.
Taxonomy of Prionochelys
Three original species of Prionochelys were recognized based on geographic location, stratigraphic age, and minor variations in the arrangement of the neural/epineural series (Zangerl, 1953). P. galeotergum is based on a single specimen from the Niobrara formation of Kansas (FMNH PR125) and was differentiated from P. matutina and P. nauta on the lack of contribution to the pectoral keel elevation by the 2nd or 3rd neural, the presence of a keel elevation dorsal to the suprapygals, and the blunt, narrow marginal facet of the pygal. Examination of the type of P. galeotergum shows that the 2nd neural does contribute slightly to the pectoral keel elevation similar to the condition observed in P. matutina. Zangerl (1953) identified the epithecal element preserved with PR125 as the epineural between the 5th and 6th neurals, despite the fact that neither the 5th nor 6th neural are preserved with this specimen. The presence of an episuprapygal ossification was the second character used by Zangerl to diagnose P. galeotergum from other species of Prionochelys but at the time of his assessment, PR125 was the only Prionochelys specimen for which this area of the carapace was adequately known. The newly described specimens of Prionochelys presented here show that this feature was also present in P. matutina. The lone epithecal element with PR125 is identical to the episuprapygal of P. matutina and when turned backwards from the direction figured by Zangerl, articulates nicely with the small sutural pit on the anterior facet of the pygal.
The third feature, the size and shape of the pygal, is clearly a variable character for all species of Prionochelys. The anterior facet of the pygal expands laterally during ontogeny as evidenced by the differences between the pygal of the smaller specimens of P. matutina (MSC 3036, Fig. 5; MSC 1540, Fig. 8) and that of the larger specimen MSC 39013 (Fig. 6). Zangerl (1953) notes that due to its small size, PR125 likely represents a younger individual so it is presumable that the anterior facet of the pygal will be narrow when compared with larger specimens of Prionochelys. Based on the characters outlined above, P. galeotergum should be considered a junior synonym of P. matutina.
The other species of Prionochelys, P. nauta, is notably distinct from Prionochelys matutina while still exhibiting all of the apomorphic characters of the genus. Zangerl described the morphology of P. matutina as being more ‘primitive’ than that of P. nauta and proposed a direct ancestor/descendant relationship between the two species. The fossil occurrence of the two species supports this notion with P. matutina being the stratigraphically older member of the lineage (Fig. 11). Unfortunately, the anatomical data available for P. nauta is extremely limited and without more complete specimens of P. nauta, this proposed evolutionary relationship cannot be tested within a phylogenetic context. Despite the lack of described material for this species, P. nauta possessed the same midsagittal carapacial keel comprised of both neurals and epineurals found in species of both Ctenochelys and Peritresius. There are two clearly diagnosable species of Prionochelys, and the following revision of the genus is proposed:
Type species Prionochelys nauta Zangerl, 1953
Amended generic diagnosis Moderately sized marine turtle similar in size to Ctenochelys stenoporus. Differentiated from Toxochelys Cope, 1873 and Thinochelys Zangerl, 1953 by the presence of keeled neurals, epineurals, and strongly serrated posterior peripherals. Diagnosed from other Cretaceous pan-cheloniids such as Ctenochelys spp. by the highly serrated lateral edges of peripherals 4–11 and the deeply embayed anterior nuchal emargination resulting in a more distinctly cordiform carapacial outline. Diagnosed from Peritresius spp. by the increased contact between the hyo- and hypoplastron, the relative width of the neuralia, and the presence of eight neurals and one preneural.
Type locality Mooreville Chalk Formation, Dallas County, Alabama
Referred material FMNH specimens: P27561, PR31, P27479, PR222, PR185; MSC specimens: MSC 3500, MSC 6086, MSC 3036, MSC 2720, MSC 1915, MSC 39013, MSC 38604, MSC 2610, MSC 2045, MSC 3140, MSC 1719, MSC 5626.
Amended diagnosis MCL ∼90–100 cm. Specimens can be diagnosed as Prionochelys matutina based on the presence of a pair of epineurals between neurals 4–5, the loss of a cervical keel elevation, and the sharply crested, posteriorly oriented apex of the episuprapygal.
Holotype FMNH P26237, (Zangerl, 1953), pl. 27.
Type locality Marlbrook Marl Formation, Howard County, Arkansas, USA.
Diagnosis Can be distinguished from P. matutina by the presence of a nearly triangular first peripheral in dorsal or ventral view, a pronounced cervical keel elevation on the dorsal facet of the preneural, a preneural that is wider than long with distinct anterolateral ‘wings’, the lack of a second epineural integrated into to the pectoral elevation of the neural series, peripherals with a deeply notched marginal edge such that the depth of the notch in peripherals 6–10 is equal to or greater than the width of the peripheral at the level of the scute sulcus, and costal plates wider than the adjacent fontanelles.
Description See Zangerl (1953).
Parsimony analysis resulted in 42 MPTs of 342 steps. A strict consensus tree (Fig. 13A) shows good resolution of the various major clades within Americhelydia. Toxochelys latiremis was recovered as the most primitive member of Pan-Chelonioidea while Prionochelys matutina was recovered as a pan-cheloniid and member of a monophyletic clade which also includes Ctenochelys and Peritresius (Fig. 13B). This grouping is sister to the clade originating from the common ancestor of Allopleuron hofmanni (Gray, 1831), Puppigerus camperi (Gray, 1831), and Cheloniidae. The possibility of Prionochelys, Ctenochelys, and Peritresius forming a monophyletic clade was first proposed by Hirayama (1997) based on the presence of epithecal ossifications (epineurals) dorsal to the neurals (ch. 127/1). The number of epineurals, their position within the neural series, and the general morphology of the individual epineurals varies greatly within the group (Fig. 13C). The loss of a cervical keel elevation and the sharply pointed, posteriorly hooked apex of episuprapygal are both apomorphies of Prionochelys and the presence of a second epineural in the formation of the pectoral elevation is interpreted here as an autapomorphy of P. matutina. The synapomorphies uniting the major clades within Pan-Chelonioidea are summarized below.
|PAN-CHELONIOIDEA Joyce, Parham & Gauthier, 2004|
Originating with the common ancestor of Toxochelys latiremis and Lepidochelys kempii (Garman, 1880), this clade is united by an open suture between the squamosal and quadrate (ch, 30/1), an articulation between the nuchal and the neural spine of the 8th cervical vertebra in the form of a raised pedestal on the ventral midline of the nuchal (ch. 120/2), the retention of a posterior plastral fontanelle in the adult stage (ch. 151/1), xiphiplastra being narrow, posteriorly elongate struts (ch. 170/2), humeri at least as long as the femora in length (ch. 246/1), and a flattening of the carpal and tarsal elements (ch. 254/1).
|CHELONIOIDEA Oppel, 1811|
Originating with the most recent common ancestor of Dermochelys coriacea (Vandellius, 1761) and Chelonia mydas (Linnaeus, 1758), crown group chelonioids are united here by a concealed foramen stapedio-temporale in dorsal view (ch. 17/0), the presence of a rod-like rostrum basisphenoidale (ch. 86/1), and having a coracoid that meets or exceeds the length of the humerus (ch. 221/1).
|PAN-CHELONIIDAE Joyce, Parham & Gauthier, 2004|
Recovered in the present study as a paraphyletic assemblage of Cretaceous and Tertiary species, Pan-Cheloniidae is supported by the presence of an incipient secondary palate (ch. 40/1), a deep C-shaped concavity on the ventral surface of the basioccipital (ch. 81/1), a high dorsum sellae (ch. 90/1), having foramina anterius canalis carotici cerebralis smaller than the foramina anterius canalis carotici palatinum (ch. 91/1), and the entry point of the palatine artery into the skull being the foramen posterius canalis carotici palatinum between the basisphenoid and pterygoid (ch. 101/1).
|CTENOCHELYIDAE (newly proposed clade)|
The existence of this taxon has been hypothesized for more than 20 years (Hirayama, 1997) and is supported by phylogenetic evidence in the present study and in other cladistic studies of marine turtles incorporating multiple species of Late Cretaceous pan-cheloniid (Gentry et al., 2018). I propose the formal naming of this group as Ctenochelyidae after the stratigraphically oldest member of the group, C. stenoporus.
Phylogenetic definition ‘Ctenochelyidae’ refers to the clade arising from the most recent common ancestor of Ctenochelys (orig. Toxochelys) stenoporus, P. matutina, and Peritresius (orig. Chelone) ornatus. The term ‘Ctenochelyidae’ first appears in Karl, Biermann & Tichy (2012) but no explicit definition for the clade is provided. Based on the context in which the name is used, Karl, Biermann & Tichy (2012) appear to be using the term to refer to the clade formed by the recognized species of Ctenochelys however, this usage does not follow established taxonomic practices. The name Ctenochelyidae is herein reassigned to the phylogenetically defined clade formed by the species listed above in order to maintain nomenclatural consistency.
Diagnosis Members of Ctenochelyidae can be diagnosed relative to other turtles by the following combination of derived characters: the presence of an incipient secondary palate involving minor contributions from the palatine and vomer (ch. 40/1), a domed contribution of the anteroventral portion of the vomer to the palate roof (ch. 49/1), the presence of a rod-like rostrum basisphenoidale (ch. 86/1), posteromedial nuchal fontanelles (ch. 123/1), epineural ossifications (ch. 127/1), a high degree of shell and plastral fenestration (ch. 133/3), and a pronounced metischial process (ch. 234/1).
Referred taxa In addition to the species listed in the phylogenetic definition of the clade, Ctenochelyidae also includes Ctenochelys acris, Prionochelys nauta, Peritresius martini Gentry et al., 2018, and all of their descendants. It is possible that other Late Cretaceous durophagous stem cheloniids such as Euclastes wielandi (Hay, 1908) and Pacifichelys urbanai Parham & Pyenson, 2010 may be sister to Ctenochelyidae given that several cladistic studies of fossil marine turtles have placed various species of Euclastes and Pacifichelys on the stem of Cheloniidae (Lynch & Parham, 2003; Parham, 2005; Kear & Lee, 2006; Lapparent de Broin et al., 2014). However, due the limited postcranial material known for Pacifichelys, the complete absence of described postcranial material for Euclastes, and the tendency of species scored exclusively from cranial material to behave as rogue taxa in the present matrix (see Gentry et al., 2018), it is not possible to precisely determine their phylogenetic interrelationships.
Remarks Among Cretaceous pan-chelonioids, there appears to be a decrease through time in the size of the foramen palatinum posterius as well as an increase through time in the size of the plastral fontanelles, the size and anterior expansion of the medial processes of the pubes, and the degree to which the ventral most portion of the palatine and vomer contribute to the formation of a secondary palate (Fig. 14). This trend is exemplified by members of Ctenochelyidae and in P. matutina, there appears to have been a primitive undershelving of the choana formed by the palatines and vomer, similar to but not as complete as the condition observed in skulls assigned to more derived pan-cheloniids such as Euclastes wielandi (Hirayama & Tong, 2003; AMNH 30030, text-fig. 1, p. 847), Pacifichelys hutchisoni (Lynch & Parham, 2003; LACM 103351, fig. 2, p. 24), and Allopleuron hofmanni (Mulder, 2003; NHM 42913, pl. 11, p. 51). This durophagous feeding specialization of Prionochelys and at least one species of Ctenochelys (C. acris) may be one of the earliest examples of the evolution of this ecomorphology in total group chelonioids (Parham & Pyenson, 2010). Interestingly, Toxochelys latiremis is not recovered as a sister taxon to Ctenochelyidae nor is it recovered as a pan-cheloniid. Despite the occasional interpretation of T. latiremis as a stem cheloniid (Hirayama, 1997; Weems & Brown, 2017), Toxochelys latiremis is recovered here and more often as a stem chelonioid (Kear & Lee, 2006; Joyce, 2007; Sterli, 2010 (Toxochelys latiremys [sic]); Anquetin, 2012; Rabi et al., 2013 (Toxochelys latiremys [sic]); Cadena & Parham, 2015; Zhou & Rabi, 2015; Gentry, 2016; Gentry et al., 2018). The posteromedial nuchal fontanelles (ch. 123/1) and pronounced metischial processes (ch. 234/1) of the ctenochelyids (Fig. 15) are interpreted here as symplesiomorphies as both features are also found in the pan-chelonioid species Toxochelys latiremis (Nicholls, 1988; Matzke, 2009).
|CHELONIIDAE Bonaparte, 1832|
Crown group cheloniids are united by a contact between the parietal and squamosal owing to a poorly developed temporal emargination (ch. 13/0), a loss of foramina praepalatinum on the ventral surface of the premaxillae (ch. 35/1), significant contributions to the upper triturating surface by the palatines (ch. 39/1), contact between the vomer and palatines anterior to the internal naris (ch. 41/1), a posteriorly expanded upper triturating surface which obscures the vomerine pillar in ventral view (ch. 50/2), a sizeable contribution to the triturating surface by the vomer (ch. 51/1), and the scar for the latissimus dorsi and teres major muscles being located at or near the middle of the humeral diaphysis (ch. 245/1). The loss of the foramen palatinum posterius was found to be a shared derived characteristic of crown cheloniids and Dermochelys coriacea (ch. 66/2).
Epithecal ossifications in marine turtles
Although a number of fossil (Calcarichelys gemma Zangerl, 1953; Allopleuron hofmanni) and extant (juvenile Caretta caretta) marine adapted turtle possess keeled neurals, only members of Ctenochelyidae exhibit neural crests consisting of both thecal and epithecal ossifications (Fig. 13). These epithecal elements are positioned at or near the pinnacle of each neural crest and dorsal to the junction of the first and second suprapygal. Prionochelys matutina is unique in having a pair of epineurals at the peak of the second neural crest and a posteriorly oriented apex of the episuprapygal ossification. Aside from the Coniacian-Campanian genera Ctenochelys and Prionochelys, the Campanian-Maastrichtian taxon Peritresius also possessed epineurals (Baird, 1964; Gentry et al., 2018). Based on the presumed arrangement of the neurals, the epineurals of Peritresius are shifted posteriorly relative to the condition observed for Prionochelys and Ctenochelys.
The only other turtles known to possess any form of epithecal ossification are the dermochelyids though Cretaceous species often referred to the stem of Dermochelyidae (Protostegidae Cope, 1872) lack these elements entirely. Another Cretaceous species routinely assigned to the stem of D. coriacea is Mesodermochelys undulatus Hirayama & Chitoku, 1996 from the Maastrichtian of Japan. However, this species has more recently been shown to be a derived protostegid (Hirayama, 2007, preliminary result), a radiation of sea turtles that may or may not share a marine ancestor with chelonioids (Joyce, 2007; see discussion in Cadena & Parham, 2015). The Campanian species Corsochelys haliniches Zangerl, 1960 has also been described as a stem dermochelyid, however, the only unambiguously referred specimen of C. haliniches is the holotype, which possesses neither a neural series nor a complete skull and only a partial peripheral series and plastron. Tong & Hirayama (2004) described a partial hyoplastron from the Maastrichtian of Morocco as being similar to that of C. haliniches but given the partial nature of the specimen, conservatively referred it to Dermochelyidae gen. and sp. indeterminate. Based on the fact that C. haliniches is currently known from a single specimen which does not exhibit any of the diagnostic features of Dermochelyoidea, its placement as a stem dermochelyid is doubtful.
The earliest definitive dermochelyid known to possess the carapacial mosaic of epithecal osteoderms characteristic of D. coriacea is Arabemys crassisculata Tong et al., 1999 from the late Paleocene-early Eocene of Saudi Arabia (Joyce et al., 2013). The roughly 30 My temporal gap between the first occurrence of Arabemys and latest occurrence of Ctenochelys coupled with the presumably distant phylogenetic relationship and the presence of several possible stem dermochelyids lacking epithecal osteoderms makes it highly unlikely that the common ancestor of Ctenochelyidae, Dermochelyidae, and Cheloniidae possessed any form of developed epithecal element. It is far more likely that epithecal ossifications evolved independently on both the stem of Dermochelyidae and the stem of Cheloniidae. Unlike the Cenozoic cheloniids which subsequently lost epithecal ossifications, the epitheca of the dermochelyids continued to develop until the vast majority of the typical carapacial elements were lost (Versluys, 1914; Hay, 1922; Rieppel, 2013).
Remarks on Late Cretaceous pan-chelonioid paleobiogeography
The regional endemism of many Late Cretaceous marine turtles is a well-documented paleobiographical phenomenon (Zangerl, 1953; Nicholls & Russell, 1990; Hirayama, 1997). It is possible that this perceived endemism may be the result of poorly defined autopomorphic character suites for Cretaceous pan-chelonioid species leading to either the misidentification of fossil material belonging to these species or the creation of morphologically ambiguous ‘junk’ taxa. However, with regard to North American lineages, it does appear that widely distributed taxa are somewhat less common than those currently thought to be regionally endemic (Gentry et al., 2018). Recently, studies of fossil pan-chelonioids from the U.S. Gulf Coastal Plain have identified material belonging to species historically thought to be endemic to the Western Interior Seaway (WIS) (Toxochelys latiremis—Gentry & Ebersole, 2018; Ctenochelys stenoporus—A Gentry, pers. obs., 2017) and others thought to have been restricted to the Northeastern Atlantic Coast (NEAC) (Peritresius ornatus—Gentry et al., 2018). The synonymy of Prionochelys galeotergum with Prionochelys matutina makes P. matutina one of only two species of Late Cretaceous pan-cheloniid identified from both the WIS and Mississippi Embayment (ME). Additionally, there is at least one report of possible Prionochelys material from the NEAC (Baird & Case, 1966). The discovery and description of more complete pan-cheloniid specimens from all three regions, especially those possessing shell-skull associations, will likely lead to the creation of more complete diagnostic character sets for these species and in turn, may lend additional support to the emerging pattern of shared pan-cheloniid taxa between the WIS, ME, and NEAC.
Phylogenetic analysis places Prionochelys matutina on the stem of Cheloniidae as a member of a monophyletic grouping (Ctenochelyidae) with other North American Late Cretaceous pan-cheloniids, including Ctenochelys stenoporus, Ctenochelys acris, Peritresius martini, and Peritresius ornatus. The members of Ctenochelyidae possess incipient secondary palates, pronounced carapacial and plastral fontanelles at all stages of development, and are characterized by the presence of superficial ossifications at the apices of the neural keel elevations along the dorsal midline of the carapace. The epithecal osteoderms (epineurals) found in Ctenochelyidae are unique among turtles. The presence of epineurals in ctenochelyid turtles shows that epithecal ossifications arose independently in both leatherback (Dermochelyidae) and hard-shelled (Cheloniidae) marine turtles. Whether or not the epineurals of Ctenochelyidae are homologous with the dermal ossicles comprising the carapace of Dermochelys coriacea remains untested however, histological thin sectioning of dermochelyid and ctenochelyid epithecal elements may reveal meaningful information in future studies.