Does Twitter language reliably predict heart disease? A commentary on Eichstaedt et al. (2015a)

Does Twitter language reliably predict heart disease? A commentary on Eichstaedt et al. (2015a) https://t.co/NscpwazDFR @thePeerJ https://t.co/opDAY6AQiD
RT @sTeamTraen: Fans of open peer review may enjoy reading the reviews in this case: https://t.co/Cc7li5sMev https://t.co/VHCIAvr9CB
RT @sTeamTraen: New article "Does Twitter language reliably predict heart disease?" with @CoyneoftheRealm now published at @ThePeerJ. Thank…
2657 days ago
Fans of open peer review may enjoy reading the reviews in this case: https://t.co/Cc7li5sMev https://t.co/VHCIAvr9CB
2657 days ago
New article "Does Twitter language reliably predict heart disease?" with @CoyneoftheRealm now published at @ThePeerJ. Thanks to editor @TjeerdWBoonstra for steering this through what felt like a somewhat delicate review process. https://t.co/K0OZCkvgeZ
2657 days ago
RT @CoyneoftheRealm: Our article is published in @thePeerJ https://t.co/6DogNfmmx3 #Epidemiology #HealthPolicy #PsychiatryandPsychology #P…
Our article is published in @thePeerJ https://t.co/6DogNfmmx3 #Epidemiology #HealthPolicy #PsychiatryandPsychology #PublicHealth Honestly, mainly a @sTeamTraen accomplishment. I would have given up with peer review process allowing author to dictate what criitics say.
RT @TjeerdWBoonstra: Commentary on study by @JEichstaedt on predicting heart disease from Twitter data now online at @thePeerJ https://t.co…
Reviewed by author of original paper and three other reviewers. Review history available here: https://t.co/Q4T3h6ZyN1
Commentary on study by @JEichstaedt on predicting heart disease from Twitter data now online at @thePeerJ https://t.co/yUcaYb5U3A