Citation sources

Updated weekly. Details via Crossref
Crossref Scopus Google Scholar
25 22 Search
2025
Developing Surveys on Questionable Research Practices: Four Challenging Design Problems
Journal of Academic Ethics
2024
The Crosswise Model for Surveys on Sensitive Topics: A General Framework for Item Selection and Statistical Analysis
Psychometrika
2022
Reliability and validation of an attitude scale regarding responsible conduct in research
PLOS ONE
2022
Principles and Practice of Clinical Trials
2022
Do biomedical researchers differ in their perceptions of plagiarism across Europe? Findings from an online survey among leading universities
BMC Medical Ethics
2022
Handle with Care: Implementation of the List Experiment and Crosswise Model in a Large-scale Survey on Academic Misconduct
Field Methods
2022
A Meta-analysis of the Relative Effectiveness of the Item Count Technique Compared to Direct Questioning
Sociological Methods & Research
2022
Losing young researchers in the authorship battle, under-reported casualties
Ethics, Medicine and Public Health
2021
Estimating the prevalence of and characteristics associated with prescription opioid diversion among a clinic population living with HIV: Indirect and direct questioning techniques
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
2021
Functionality of the Crosswise Model for Assessing Sensitive or Transgressive Behavior: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Frontiers in Psychology
2020
Perceptions of plagiarism by biomedical researchers: an online survey in Europe and China
BMC Medical Ethics
2020
Principles and Practice of Clinical Trials
2019
Fake Peer Review and Inappropriate Authorship Are Real Evils
Journal of Korean Medical Science
2019
Is Biomedical Research Protected from Predatory Reviewers?
Science and Engineering Ethics
2019
Implementation evaluation of an iron supplementation programme in high-school students: the crosswise model
Public Health Nutrition
2019
Unethical Authorship in Scientific Publications (A Review of the Problem)
Scientific and Technical Information Processing
2019
Неэтичное авторство в научных публикациях* (обзор проблемы)
Научно-техническая информация. Серия 1: Организация и методика информационной работы
2017
Scientific Misconduct Hurts
Annals of Internal Medicine
2017
The manipulation of scholarly rating and measurement systems: constructing excellence in an era of academic stardom
Teaching in Higher Education
2017
Research Ethics Forum
2017
Investigating the Reliability and Factor Structure of Kalichman’s “Survey 2: Research Misconduct” Questionnaire: A Post Hoc Analysis Among Biomedical Doctoral Students in Scandinavia
Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics
2016
High time for a common plagiarism detection system
Scientometrics
2016
Critical evaluation of the guidelines of the Finnish Advisory Board on Research Integrity and of their application
Research Integrity and Peer Review
2016
Research misconduct: time for a re‐think?
Internal Medicine Journal
2015
Scientific Dishonesty
Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics