More than 160 years ago Koch described the endemic species Glomeris aurita (1847) from ‘upper Italy’. While this species was mentioned in the literature by Brölemann (1895), and listed as a species occurring in caves east of Lago di Como by Manfredi (1932), definite specimen-based records have been absent since 1895. Verhoeff, Attems and Strasser, probably the most prolific researchers and collectors of the northern Italian millipede fauna, list this species (Verhoeff, 1936; Attems, 1949), but mention that they had never seen any specimens. In the most recent atlas, G. aurita is listed as a potential cavernicole (Kime & Enghoff, 2011). With the types apparently lost (see below), no identified specimen of G. aurita was readily present in any natural history collection. Indeed, the colour pattern figured in the first description of G. aurita, as well as the striae on its thoracic shield, both key characters for the identification of Glomeris species (Hoess, 2000), are very similar to the black colour morph of one of Italy‘s most widespread pill millipede species (Kime & Enghoff, 2011), Glomeris romana (Verhoeff, 1900). Such dark colour mophs are common in poikilothermic animals (Clusella-Trullas, Van Wyk & Spotila, 2009). The question whether G. aurita represents a true Italian endemic or a high altitude black colour morph of the widespread G. romana seemed impossible to answer.
G. aurita Koch, 1847, is the oldest of the endemic Italian pill millipedes (order Glomerida) of the genus Glomeris Leach, 1814. Italy is particularly rich in Glomerida endemics, with 21 country endemics known (Strasser & Minelli, 1984; Kime & Enghoff, 2011), more than in all other European countries combined. Most of these endemics (14) are restricted to northern Italy. G. aurita Koch, 1847, along with seven species of the G. dorsosanguine species-group (G. dorsosanguine Verhoeff, 1906, G. judicaria Verhoeff, 1936, G. longaronensis Verhoeff, 1930, G. sanguinicolor Verhoeff, 1909, G. schubarti Verhoeff, 1931, G. solis Verhoeff, 1934, and G. strasseri Verhoeff, 1929), is one of eight Glomeris species microendemic to north-eastern Italy that remains of dubious status, most of them known only from their first description. Recently, progress has been made in the redescription of other forgotten pill millipede species. One of these ‘forgotten’ species, G. apuana Verhoeff, 1911 was revised with the help of barcode data (Wesener, 2015b). Additionally, a recent integrative revision investigated four endemics, G. oropensis Verhoeff, 1934, G. primordialis Verhoeff, 1932, G. oblongoguttata Verhoeff, 1894 and G. larii Verhoeff, 1921 belonging to the Glomeris klugii species-group, and discovered G. larii as a synonym (Wesener & Conrad, 2016).
An opportunity to use a molecular analysis to clarify whether G. aurita represents a true Italian endemic unexpectedly arose after Axel Schönhofer (Schönhofer et al., 2015), a renowned Opiliones expert, shared specimens fitting the original description (Koch, 1847) of G. aurita, and the drawings published in Koch’s atlas (Koch, 1863). The specimens were collected as by catch from alpine meadows (>1,500 m) in the Bergamasque Alps in northern Italy. Unfortunately, the samples were too old by the time the molecular analysis was planned and a DNA extraction was unsuccessful.
The possibility of clarifying the status of G. aurita motivated a July 2014 expedition to the three localities of the rediscovered specimens. However, the exact collection spots were the last places still covered by snow fields and no specimens were found. The author then enlisted the help of Marco Valle and his colleagues from the Bergamo Museum to obtain relatively fresh specimens suitable for a molecular analysis of G. aurita. These specimens could be compared with sequences obtained from the black colour morph of G. romana, as well as several other widespread species with black colour morphs such as G. connexa, the black G. marginata, and G. klugii, including another endemic of the Bergamasque area (Hoess & Scholl, 1999), G. oblongoguttata, as well as other high-altitude Glomeris species, such as G. transalpina (Koch, 1836), G. oropensis (Verhoeff, 1932), and G. primordialis (Verhoeff, 1936). Citizen science plays an even greater role in the digital age through large websites (iNaturalist, 2018) visited by thousands of people every day, many providing image vouchers for numerous species. However, most of the recorded species are those that are large enough (usually >10 mm), can easily be seen, and can be identified based on photographs, something impossible for the majority of soil arthropods such as millipedes. Luckily, for pill millipedes of the genus Glomeris, the color pattern is an important character to distinguish species. Regarding G. aurita, citizen scientists, including Fernando Scarlassara, from the Italian naturalist online forum ‘NaturaMediterraneo’ (NaturaMediterraneo, 2018) have provided further locality data of the species that greatly expands its known distribution. As these citizen scientists did not collect and conserve encountered specimens, photographic evidence can be used as vouchers for the localities.
This study shows how molecular barcoding techniques can correctly distinguish between colour morphs and separate species of Italian pill millipede species. The importance of citizen science, the passing on of by catch, and the value of the examination of the collections of local museums allows the outline of the distribution and the ecological niche of hard-to-collect species such as high-montane endemics.
Material and Methods
Aside from the coloration pattern, the number of thoracic shield striae are the most important taxonomic character in the genus Glomeris. In order to assess the intraspecific variation of the striae, they were counted for 58 specimens from 10 localities of G. aurita as well as for 59 specimens from 21 localities of the syntopic G. oblongoguttata. Specimens of both sexes as well as juveniles were included (Supplementary information 1).
For scanning electron microscopy (SEM), samples were transferred to 100% ethanol, dried overnight, sputtered with gold and observed under a Hitachi S4260 scanning electron microscope. As the taxonomically relevant characters for species of the genus Glomeris have not been explored in detail, as many potentially important characters as possible are illustrated.
To assess the utility of less invasive techniques to study the taxonomically relevant characters of pill millipedes, a micro CT scan of a specimen of G. aurita was also conducted. Obtained results were compared with those of the SEM. For micro-CT, the specimen was scanned in ethanol inside the collection vial in a Bruker Skyscan 1,272 system. Settings were: Source Voltage =60 kV, Source Current = 166 µA, Exposure = 915 ms, Rotation of 360° in Rotation Step of 0.2°, Frame Averaging = 7, Random Movement = 15, Flat Field Correction ON, Geometrical Correction ON, Filter = Al 0.25 mm. Reconstruction and thermal drift correction was performed in NRecon 188.8.131.52 (Bruker microCT). The resulting image stack was cropped in ImageJ (Abràmoff, Magalhães & Ram, 2004), preserving the original pixel sizes. Subsequent volume rendering and measurements were done in Drishti 2.6 (Limaye, 2012).
Biogeographic data sampling via citizen scientists and museum collections
All Glomerida material of the vast collections (>200 vials) of the local Italian museum, the Museo di Scienze Naturale “E. Caffi”, in Bergamo was obtained on loan and determined to species-level (see below).
A further five localities for G. aurita were discovered via posts in an Italian naturalist forum (Natura Mediterraneo) and thankfully mapped by F. Scarlassara. For these five localities (detailed below) only photographic evidence for the occurrence of the species exists.
DNA extraction, amplification and sequencing
Generally, the DNA protocol was similar to that employed in earlier studies (Wesener, 2015a; Wesener, 2015b), utilizing the degenerated HCO-JJ/LCO-JJ primer pair (Astrin & Stüben, 2008). The three new sequenced have been uploaded to Genbank under the code MH574905 –MH574907 (Table 1).
|Species||Voucher #||Locality||Genbank #|
|Glomeris marginata||ZFMK MYR009||Germany, Bonn-Kessenich, Venusberg||FJ409909|
|Glomeris connexa 1||ZSM MYR00372||Italy, Lombardia, Sondrio.||JN271879|
|Glomeris connexa 2||ZSM MYR00027||Germany, Bavaria, Andechs.||HM888096|
|Glomeris connexa 3||ZSM MYR00028||Germany, Bavaria, Scheidegg.||HM888097|
|Glomeris connexa 4||ZSM MYR00026||Germany, Bavaria, Garmisch.||HM888095|
|Glomeris transalpina 1||ZFMK MYR2609||Switzerland, Wallis, Riederalm, E. Riederfurka.||KX714038|
|Glomeris transalpina 2||ZFMK MYR2636||Switzerland, Wallis, Simplonpass.||KX714039|
|Glomeris oropensis||ZFMK MYR4534||Italy, Piemonte, Biella, NW of Oropa.||KX714040|
|G. romana marinensis||ZFMK MYR797||San Marino, San Marino Stadt.||KX714036|
|G. romana romana||ZFMK MYR1471||Italy, Umbria, Perugia, NE Gosparini,.||KX714037|
|Glomeris oblongoguttata 1||ZFMK MYR4567||Italy, Lago di Iseo, Pisogne.||KX714041|
|Glomeris oblongoguttata 2||ZFMK MYR4570||Italy, Lago di Iseo, Pisogne.||KX714042|
|Glomeris oblongoguttata 3||ZFMK MYR4564||Italy, Lago di Iseo, Pisogne.||KX714043|
|Glomeris primordialis 1||ZFMK MYR4744||Italy, Piemonte, Biella, Pollone - Favaro.||KX714046|
|Glomeris primordialis 2||ZFMK MYR4741||Italy, Piemonte, Biella, Pollone - Favaro.||KX714047|
|Glomeris klugii 1||ZFMK MYR4522||Germany, NRW, Hagen-Holthausen.||KX714057|
|Glomeris klugii 2||ZFMK MYR4520||Germany, NRW, Hagen-Holthausen.||KX714058|
|Glomeris klugii 3||ZFMK MYR4768||Germany, Siebengebirge, Löwenburg.||KX714060|
|Glomeris klugii 4||ZFMK MYR4769||Germany, Siebengebirge, Löwenburg.||KX714061|
|Glomeris klugii 5||ZFMK MYR4729||Italy, Riva, Valley of W. Riva.||KX714065|
|Glomeris klugii 6||ZFMK MYR4728||Italy, Riva, Valley of W. Riva.||KX714066|
|Glomeris aurita 1*||ZFMK MYR 2867||Oltre il Colle, Valle d’Arera, 2,000 m||MH574905|
|Glomeris aurita 2*||ZFMK MYR 2866||Oltre il Colle, Valle d’Arera, 2,000 m||MH574906|
|Glomeris aurita 3*||ZFMK MYR 2641||Oltre il Cole, Mt. Alben, Piano Palla, locality Forca Larga, 1,480 m.||MH574907|
Alignment and distance analysis
Sequences were aligned by hand in Bioedit (Hall, 1999). The final dataset included 24 nucleotide sequences with 657 positions (three newly sequenced and 21 from Genbank, see Table 1). The alignment is provided as (Supplementary information 2). Phylogenetic analyses were conducted in MEGA6 (Tamura et al., 2013). A Modeltest, as implemented in MEGA6 (Tamura et al., 2013), was performed to find the best fitting maximum likelihood substitution model. Models with the lowest BIC scores (Bayesian Information Criterion) are considered to describe the best substitution pattern. Codon positions included were 1st + 2nd + 3rd. Modeltest selected the Hasegawa–Kishino–Yano model (Hasegawa, Kishino & Yano, 1985) with gamma distribution and invariant sites as best fitting model (lnL −2,692.89, Gamma 0.11, R 5.29, Freq A: 0.265, T: 0.39, C: 0.141, G: 0.204).
The evolutionary history was inferred by using the maximum likelihood method based on the selected Hasegawa–Kishino–Yano model (Hasegawa, Kishino & Yano, 1985). The tree with the highest log likelihood (−2690.02) is shown. Initial tree(s) for the heuristic search were obtained automatically by applying Neighbor-Join and BioNJ algorithms to a matrix of pairwise distances estimated using the Maximum Composite Likelihood (MCL) approach, and then selecting the topology with superior log likelihood value. A discrete Gamma distribution was used to model evolutionary rate differences among sites (five categories (+G, parameter = 0.1129)). The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths measured in the number of substitutions per site. The analysis involved 24 nucleotide sequences. Codon positions included were 1st + 2nd + 3rd. The bootstrap consensus tree inferred from 1000 replicates (Felsenstein, 1985) is taken to represent the evolutionary history of the analyzed taxa. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths measured in the number of substitutions per site.
The number of pairwise base differences per site were calculated in MEGA6 (Tamura et al., 2013). Codon positions included were 1st + 2nd + 3rd. In the distance analysis, all positions containing ‘N’s were removed for each sequenced pair. There were a total of 657 positions in the final dataset. The results are shown in Table 2.
|2||Glomeris connexa 1||0,139|
|3||Glomeris connexa 2||0,143||0,017|
|4||Glomeris connexa 3||0,143||0,017||0,000|
|5||Glomeris connexa 4||0,143||0,017||0,000||0,000|
|6||Glomeris transalpina 1||0,146||0,134||0,137||0,137||0,137|
|7||Glomeris transalpina 2||0,146||0,134||0,137||0,137||0,137||0,000|
|9||G. romana marinensis||0,146||0,145||0,151||0,151||0,151||0,151||0,151||0,154|
|10||G. romana romana||0,146||0,145||0,151||0,151||0,151||0,151||0,151||0,154||0,000|
|11||Glomeris oblongo 1||0,152||0,148||0,146||0,146||0,146||0,110||0,110||0,114||0,137||0,137|
|12||Glomeris oblongo 2||0,152||0,148||0,146||0,146||0,146||0,110||0,110||0,114||0,137||0,137||0,000|
|13||Glomeris oblongo 3||0,152||0,148||0,146||0,146||0,146||0,110||0,110||0,114||0,137||0,137||0,000||0,000|
|14||Glomeris primordialis 1||0,151||0,125||0,125||0,125||0,125||0,088||0,088||0,102||0,149||0,149||0,100||0,100||0,100|
|15||Glomeris primordialis 2||0,142||0,128||0,128||0,128||0,128||0,090||0,090||0,096||0,145||0,145||0,096||0,096||0,096||0,014|
|16||Glomeris klugii 1||0,135||0,142||0,142||0,142||0,142||0,085||0,085||0,104||0,135||0,135||0,094||0,094||0,094||0,085||0,078|
|17||Glomeris klugii 2||0,132||0,139||0,139||0,139||0,139||0,088||0,088||0,106||0,137||0,137||0,097||0,097||0,097||0,088||0,081||0,003|
|18||Glomeris klugii 3||0,135||0,142||0,142||0,142||0,142||0,085||0,085||0,104||0,135||0,135||0,094||0,094||0,094||0,085||0,078||0,000||0,003|
|19||Glomeris klugii 4||0,135||0,142||0,142||0,142||0,142||0,085||0,085||0,104||0,135||0,135||0,094||0,094||0,094||0,085||0,078||0,000||0,003||0,000|
|20||Glomeris klugii 5||0,140||0,149||0,149||0,149||0,149||0,088||0,088||0,107||0,145||0,145||0,097||0,097||0,097||0,085||0,078||0,012||0,015||0,012||0,012|
|21||Glomeris klugii 6||0,140||0,149||0,149||0,149||0,149||0,088||0,088||0,107||0,145||0,145||0,097||0,097||0,097||0,085||0,078||0,012||0,015||0,012||0,012||0,000|
|22||Glomeris aurita 1*||0,157||0,139||0,143||0,143||0,143||0,104||0,104||0,107||0,131||0,131||0,082||0,082||0,082||0,102||0,099||0,084||0,087||0,084||0,084||0,090||0,090|
|23||Glomeris aurita 2*||0,160||0,145||0,151||0,151||0,151||0,107||0,107||0,101||0,137||0,137||0,085||0,085||0,085||0,111||0,107||0,091||0,094||0,091||0,091||0,094||0,094||0,024|
|24||Glomeris aurita 3*||0,160||0,145||0,151||0,151||0,151||0,107||0,107||0,101||0,137||0,137||0,085||0,085||0,085||0,111||0,107||0,091||0,094||0,091||0,091||0,094||0,094||0,024||0,000|
Sequence data and distance analysis
Our genetic analysis recovers G. aurita in a distinct monophyly with high statistical support (Fig. 1). G. aurita is in a well-supported sister-group (86%) with the other Bergamasque endemic G. oblongoguttata. Both are standing in a grouping supporting the G. klugii species-group, with G. klugii followed by G. oropensis and G. transalpina; G. primordialis is in the basal-most position. The other three species are separate, with G. romana in an unsupported sister-group with G. marginata and G. connexa (Fig. 1).
G. aurita shows the lowest interspecific genetic distance to G. oblongoguttata (Table 2, 8.2–8.5%) and G. klugii (8.4–9.4%), both of which occur in direct syntopy. The two sampled populations of G. aurita show an intraspecific variation of 2.4%, with both specimens from the Valle d’Arera showing an identical haplotype.
Glomeris aurita Koch, 1847
Koch, 1847: 92 (first description); Koch, 1863: 3, pl. 1 (illustration); Berlese, 1883: 7, pl. 7 (list); Brölemann, 1895: 22 (locality); Verhoeff, 1911: 102 (key); Attems, 1927: 252 (key); Manfredi, 1932: 16 (list); Verhoeff, 1936: 226 (list); Wolf, 1938: 483 (list); Attems, 1949: 122 (list); Strasser & Minelli, 1984: (list); Minelli, 1985: 2 (list); Foddai et al., 1995: 11 (list); Kime & Enghoff, 2011: 25 (list)
ZFMK: 11 M&F, ZFMK MYR110, Italy: Prov. Bergamo, Oltre il Colle, Piano Palla, locality Forca Larga, N of Skilift, small stand of beeches on steep stony slope, under stones and wood, 1,479 m, 45.87750°N, 9.77765°E, A. Schönhofer leg. 19.09.2009; 1 M, 1 F, ZFMK MYR248, Italy: Prov. Bergamo, Roncobello, around Corno Branchino and Lago Branchino, alpine meadow, under stones, P. Pantini, A. Schönhofer leg. 17.09.2009, 1,794 m, 45.94931°N, 9.80257°E; 3 F, ZFMK MYR115, Italy: Prov. Bergamo, Valle Valzurio, Oltressenda Alta, Rifugio Rino Olme, under stones in alpine meadow, 1,814 m, 45.94810°N, 10.03777°E, A. Schönhofer leg. 18.09.2009; 1 M, ZFMK MYR2864, Bergamo, Oltre il Colle, Valle d’Arera, 2,000 m, 45.9304°N, 9.8046°E, leg. 03.viii.2014, M. Massaro & M. Valle; 3 F, ZFMK MYR2865, same data as previous; 1 M, ZFMK MYR2866, same data as previous; 1 F, ZFMK MYR2867, same data as previous; 5 M&F, ZFMK MYR4097, same data as previous; 1 F, ZFMK MYR2641, Bergamo, Oltre il Colle, Piano Palla, locality Forca Larga, N of Skilift, small stand of beeches on steep stony slope, under stones and wood, 1,479 m, 45.87750°N, 9.77765°E, leg. 24.06.2014.
Bergamo Museum: >15 M&F, Bergamo, Parre, Pendici meridionali Monte Secco, 2,100 m, 45.927°N, 9.880°E, leg. 23.07.2003; 6 M&F, Bergamo, Premolo, doline Sud di Baita Camplano, 1,850 m, 45.92°N, 9.83°E, leg. 22.07.2003; 1 ?, Bergamo, Premolo, macereto, 1,850 m, 45.92°N, 9.83°E, leg. 04.08.2004; >15 M&F, Bergamo, Premolo, Forcella di Valmora, 2,000 m, 45.933°N, 9.833°E, leg. 03.07.1983; 2 ?, Bergamo, Oltressenda Alta, Sotto cresta Valzurio, 1,700 m, 45.956°N, 10.040°E, leg. 09.08.1982; >15 M&F, Bergamo, Gromo, Passo di Valle Scura, 2,103 m, 45.976°N, 10.015°E, leg. 19.08.1982; 10 M&F, Bergamo, Gromo, Baita Alta fontana Mora, 1,950 m, 45.975°N, 10.000°E, leg. 17.06.1984; 2 M, 1 F; Bergamo, Gandelino, Baita Alta fontana Mora, 2,100 m, leg. 25.7.1984, Bonacina, Lazzaroni, Valle; 9 M&F, Bergamo, Oltre il Colle, Valle d’Arera, 2,000 m, 45.9304°N, 9.8046° E, leg. 03.viii.2014, Valle; >15 M&F, Bergamo, Oltre il Colle, Valle d’Arera, 2,050 m, leg. 22.7.-1.10.2003, pitfalls; 5 M&F, Bergamo, Oltre il Colle, Valle d’Arera, 2,050 m, leg. 04.08.-29.09.2004, pitfalls; 1 ?, Bergamo, San Giovanni Bianco, Pozzo sul Monte Cancerno, leg. 02.06.1955, Bonino; 2 M, Bergamo, Schilpario, Pendici Cimone della Bagoz, 1,700 m, leg. 06.08.-18.10.2005, pitfalls; 1 ?, Bergamo, San Giovanni Bianco, Pozzo sul Monte Cancerno, leg. 02.06.1955.
Localities with photographic evidence: Monte Baldo, 1,900 m, 45.7192°N, 10.8474°E; Monte Frerone, 2,400 m, 45.9418°N, 10.4131°E; Concarena Massif, ∼2,000 m, 46.01°N, 10.25°E; Monte Presolana, southern slope, >1,700 m, 45.949°N, 10.075°E; Passo di San Simone, 2,000 m, 46.0463°N, 9.6853°E.
Localities from the literature: Bergamo, Val Brembana, Foppolo (Brölemann, 1895), 46.04°N, 9.76°E, ∼1,600 m.
Remarks: Koch’s single known type specimen could not be located, it is not in the ZMB, NHML, ZSM, or UZH collections (personal communications), the usual depositories of type specimens by Koch (Sierwald & Reft, 2004).
Colour pattern: G. aurita resembles in its coloration the black colour morph of G. romana (Fig. 3B). Such orange (but mostly yellowish) bands also occur in G. klugii, G. oblongoguttata (Fig. 3C) and G. primordialis as well as in the two high-altitude species G. transalpina and G. oropensis. However, only in G. aurita, the orange (sometimes yellow) band of the thoracic shield expands centrally (Figs. 3D–3H). The whole ventral side of G. aurita is black, in most other Glomeris species it is more grayish in colour.
Striation: G. aurita can be easily distinguished from G. klugii and G. oblongoguttata, both of which live in syntopy (all other species are not reported from the distribution area of G. aurita), in the thoracic shield stria (see Supplementary information 1 for a comparison of G. aurita with the syntopic G. oblongoguttata). All analyzed and reported specimens of G. klugii and G. oblongoguttata lack a main stria (one that crosses the thoracic shield), while all analyzed specimens of G. aurita have such a main stria.
Head (Fig. 4A), organ of Tömösváry (Fig. 4A, 4C), antennae (Figs. 4A–4E), gnathochilarium (Fig. 4F), mandible (Fig. 5A), ozopore (Fig. 5B), collum (Fig. 5C), thoracic shield (Fig. 5D), male leg pair 1 (Fig. 5E), leg pair 2 with gonopore (Figs. 5F, 5G), male leg pair 17 (Fig. 6A), and the telopod (Figs. 6B–6D) with inner horns (Fig. 6B) are illustrated.
Ecology: G. aurita is unique among known species of Glomeris as it was apparently never collected below 1,400 m, but occurs spanning a zone ranging from 1,400–2,400 m, being most commonly recorded at an average elevation of 1,892 m. The habitats are very open mountain meadows (Fig. 3A). While G. aurita was commonly found together with widespread species such as G. connexa and G. klugii and the local endemic G. oblongoguttata, all of the three latter species (but not G. aurita) could also be found at lower elevations. Kime & Enghoff (2011) mention records, without giving any details, of G. aurita from caves. Caves, with their constant cool climate, often show a rich Diplopoda fauna with numerous morphological adaptations (Liu et al., 2017). The studied specimens of G. aurita, however, show no sign of cave adaptations.
The activity period of G. aurita, at least on the surface, seems to span June to the middle of September, just 3.5 of 12 months of the year.
Glomeris oblongoguttata Verhoeff, 1894
Comments: As relatively few localities for this Bergamasque endemic (Kime & Enghoff, 2011) are known, additional localities from the collections of the ZFMK and Bergamo Museum are listed below:
Bergamo Museum: 1 ?, Bergamo, Premolo, canalone presso sorgentina Parina, 1,800 m, 45.925°N, 9.825°E, leg. 18.07.1984; #3, 1 ?, Bergamo, Maresana, leg. 03.08.1965; 1 ?, Bergamo, Astino, leg. 15.11.1964; #93, 1 ?, Bergamo, Bossico, leg. 03.09.1959; #46, 1 ?, Bergamo, Carona, Laghi Gemelli, leg. 15.09.1980; #29, 2 ?, Bergamo, Dossena, Baite del Menna, 1,300–1,400 m, leg. 29.07.1963; #24, 2 ?, Bergamo, Entratico, I Moi, 520 m, leg. 15.-20.06.1957; #48, 1 ?, Bergamo, Oltressenda Alta, Pagherola Bassa, 1,550 m, leg. 09.08.1982; 1 ?, Bergamo, Premolo, Prateria alpina, 1,900 m, leg. 04.08.-29.09.2004; 3 ?, Bergamo, Premolo, Baita Camplano, 1,850 m, leg. 22.07.-01.10.2003; 8 M&F, Bergamo, Premolo, Baita Camplano, 1,850 m, leg. 19.06.-22.07.2003; #75, 1 ?, Bergamo, Roncobello, leg. 29.06.1970; #80, 5 M&F, Bergamo, Roncobello, torrente Valsecca, leg. 01.06.1956; #61, 2 ?, Bergamo, Selvino, 1,000 m, leg. 10.08.1959; #54, 3 ?, Bergamo, Torre de Busi, Valcava-Monte Albenza, leg. 26.09.1956; #8, 8 M&F, Bergamo, Torre de Busi, Valcava, 1,300 m, leg. 19.08.1959; #2, 6 M&F, Bergamo, Villa di Serio, Colli, leg. 23.09.1958; 5 M&F, Sondrio, Val Masino, Filorera, in ghiaione, 1,000 m, leg. 01.07.1984; #60, 3 ?, Brescia, Ponte Saviore, in pineta sopra il mulino, leg. 23.08.1963; #44, 1 ?, Brescia, Ponte Saviore, in pineta sotto sassi, leg. 21.07.1963; #49, 4 ?, Brescia, Ponte Saviore, leg. 31.07.1964.
ZFMK: ZFMK-MYR2486, 8 M&F, Brescia, Pisogne, Bachtal im ehemaligen Minenbetrieb, Fußweg zum Wasserfall, südlich Bach, kärglich bewachsener steiler NE Hang mit einzelnem Haselnußstrauch, 403 m, 45°47′46.14″N, 10°7′14.68″E, leg. 07.10.2012; ZFMK-MYR253, 3 F, Trient, Passo di Tremalzo, mainly under stones and wood in forest, 900-1500 m, 45.84N, 10.71E, leg. 11.08.2009; ZFMK-MYR2647, 1 ?, Bergamo, Valle Valzurio, Oltressenda Alta, oberhalb Spinellis, Wanderweg zum Refugio Rino Olme (Bergamo IIIA), nördlicher Hang nahe Gebirgsbach, unter Laub auf Felsbrocken, 1,000 m, 45° 55′41.20″N, 9°59′34.78″E, leg. 26.06.2014; ZFMK-MYR2648, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR619, 8 M&F, Brescia, Lago di Iseo, Pisogne, Quarry with lots of soft calcareous stones, sparse Populus only vegetation, under stones, 281 m, 45.79851°N, 10.11522°E, leg. 09.04.2011; ZFMK-MYR159, 1 F, Bergamo, Valle Valzurio, Oltressenda Alta, Spinelli, rich structured low growing deciduous forest, under stones and sieved from leaf and wood litter, 933 m, 45.92856N, 9.98221E, leg. 18.09.2009; ZFMK-MYR2639, 1 ?, Bergamo, Oltre il Colle, Piano Palla, locality Forca Larga, N of Skilift (Bergamo I), small stand of beeches on steep stony slope, under stones and wood, 1,479 m, 45.87750N, 9.77765E, leg. 24.06.2014; ZFMK-MYR2640, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2667, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2668, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2669, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2670, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2671, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2672, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2673, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2674, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2675, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2676, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2677, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2678, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2679, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2680, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2681, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2682, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2683, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2684, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2685, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2686, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2687, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2688, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2689, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2690, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2691, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2692, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2693, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2696, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR 2697, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2698, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2699, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2700, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2727, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2728, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2729, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2730, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2642, 1 ?, Bergamo, NE Roncobello (Bergamo II), steinige Alpenvegetation nahe Schneefeld, 1,600 m, 45.961023N, 9.800735E, leg. 25.06.2014; ZFMK-MYR2643, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2644, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2645, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2646, 1 F, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2733, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2734, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2735, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2736, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2737, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2738, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2739, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2740, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2741, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2742, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2743, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2744, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2745, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2746, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2747, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2748, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2749, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2750, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2751, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2752, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2753, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2754, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2755, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2756, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2757, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR2758, 1 ?, same data as previous; ZFMK-MYR1692, 1 ?, Brescia, SP50 Tavernole Sul Mella - Ville (Marmentino), Localita Molino, trockener Hang mit Brombeeren. unter Grasbüschel, 660 m, 45° 45′2.99″N, 10°15′34.32″E, leg. 24.04.2013; ZFMK-MYR213, 6 M&F, Bergamo, Valle Valzurio, Oltressenda Alta, Rifugio Rino Olme, under stones in alpine meadow, 1,814 m, 45.94810N, 10.03777E, leg. 18.09.2009; ZFMK-MYR2649, 1 ?, Bergamo, Valle Valzurio, Oltressenda Alta, Refugio Rino Olme (Bergamo IIIB), under stones in alpine meadow, 1,814 m, 45.94810N, 10.03777E, leg. 26.06.2014; ZFMK-MYR232, >8 M&F, Bergamo / Como, Zucco Barbesino, S side of Valle de Camosci, under stones in alpine meadows and stony gravel, 1,815 m, 45.95576N, 9.50679E, leg. 24.09.2009; ZFMK-MYR1693, 1 ?, Brescia, Lago di Iseo, SP48 Iseo - Polaveno, oberhalb Bosine, Westhang mit Eschen und Brombeeren, eher Trockenvegetation. unter Moos 440 m, 45°39′43.49″N, 10° 4′25.19″E, leg. 24.09.2013.
Comparison of the micro-CT scan with scanning electron microscopy
The micro-CT (Fig. 7), conducted with a specimen still in the ethanol-filled collection vial, was obviously less invasive than the SEM scans, for which a specimen had to be dissected, dried, and sputtered with gold. The CT-scan, including the formatting, and the rendering (without any manual reconstruction), was as time consuming as the SEM, taking approximately 8 working hours. The SEM sample took 2 hours of preparation/dissecting, 2 hours for mounting, and 3 hours for taking the micrographs.
The results are difficult to compare. The SEM images show a much greater detail, including spines and setae (see Figs. 4–6), which are of taxonomic importance. In the SEM images, the striae on the thoracic shield (Fig. 5D) and the transverse striae of the collum (Fig. 5C) are clearly visible, which is not the case in the CT images (Figs. 7A–7E).
Critical point drying of the specimen would probably have yielded better scan results, as was done in previous taxonomic studies (Akkari, Enghoff & Metscher, 2015; Liu, Rühr & Wesener, 2017; Sagorny & Wesener, 2017; Moritz & Wesener, 2017), but this would impact the whole specimen and no longer be a minimally invasive technique. Manual reconstruction of certain body parts could have resulted in better illustrations, e.g., of the telopods. However, such reconstructions are time-consuming. For taxonomic descriptions of millipedes, while certainly adding important information and a digital specimen to the descriptions, it does not seem possible for the CT technology to replace more traditional techniques such as SEM.
Evolutionary history of G. aurita, a high-altitude endemic
Interestingly, all central European high-altitude pill millipede species show a local, restricted distribution in different areas of the Southern Alps. None occurs in the central or northern Alps (Kime & Enghoff, 2011). This striking pattern might be connected with glaciations of the Alps, which only spared the southern-most mountains (Penck & Brückner, 1909; Holdhaus, 1954). At least for soil arthropods, such as pill millipedes of the genus Glomeris, these southern, ice-free mountains formed viable refugia allowing the survival of local endemics in climatically unsuitable times.
G. aurita—a Nunatak pill millipede?
The closely related species G. oblongoguttata, a regional endemic of almost the same areas (Hoess, 2000) as G. aurita, occurs in some places syntopic to G. aurita, but is also found at much lower elevation. The fact that G. aurita is rarely found below 1,500 m, and at high-altitude often close to snow fields and some of the coldest microclimatic spots (own observation) are hints that G. aurita, unlike G. oblongoguttata, might represent a Nunatak survivor. The species might not have retreated to warmer refugia during glaciations, but potentially survived above the glaciers on mountain tops. The observed genetic difference between the two sampled G. aurita populations (2.4%), despite being separated by less than 5 km (albeit divided by a valley), might be a further indication of such Nunatak endemism. Nunatak survivors are known from the area, such as the beetle Byrrhus focarilei (Fabbri & Pütz, 1997) endemic to the Monte Vigna Vaga in the Bergamasque Alps, and the carabid beetles Boldoriella brembana (Binaghi, 1937), Broscosoma relictum Weissmandl, 1935, and Dyschirius schatzmayri Bari, 1950 all from the Monte Arera and Monte Alben area where G. aurita occurs. Furthermore, both the Prealpi Bergamasche and the Alpi Guidicarie are known the two centers of plant microendemism (seven and five species, respectively, Tribsch, 2004) in the Alps. Further genetic studies involving more specimens of G. aurita from other mountaintops will be necessary to substantiate this hypothesis.
Biogeographic evaluation—museum collections and citizen scientists
Aside from the single literature record and three samples that came as by-catch in our possession, the majority of locality records (10) of G. aurita came from museum collections (Fig. 2). Given the few known localities where G. aurita was collected, the five new localities shown by photographic evidence via the Italian Naturalist forum (NaturaMediterraneo, 2018) significantly expand our knowledge about the distribution of the species. While most localities with citizen science evidence fall in between the localities of museum specimens, the Monte Baldo locality is located to the east of the area.
This population of G. aurita is of special importance, as it is the only locality east of the Lago di Garda (Fig. 2). During the last Ice Age, Monte Baldo was a Nunatak, completely isolated by the Adige glacier from other areas (Latella, Verdari & Gobbi, 2012), with glaciers reaching as high up as 1,400 m (Penck & Brückner, 1909). Monte Baldo is rich in local endemic invertebrates, including other millipedes such as Osellasoma caoduroi (Mauriés, 1984), but also numerous plants and insects such as the grasshopper Pseudoprumna baldensis (Krauss, 1883). A morphological and molecular analysis of G. aurita specimens of Monte Baldo is greatly encouraged to see whether or not the photographed pill millipedes belong to G. aurita or represent a local endemic. Given the known isolation of well-researched Monte Baldo during the last Ice Age, it might be possible to date the observed genetic distances of the Monte Baldo population to those of other populations. This dating might allow a more precise dating of the speciation events of the genus Glomeris in northern Italy and beyond to finally gain a better understanding of the pill millipede microendemism so prevalent in the area (Wesener & Conrad, 2016).
For Italian micro-endemic pill millipedes, the seven species of the G. dorsosanguine species-group (G. dorsosanguine, G. judicaria, G. longaronensis, G. sanguinicolor, G. schubarti, G. solis, and G. strasseri) remain dubious. All seven species are found in the mountains of SE Italy, most of them only found once or twice. In their general colour pattern, some of those species resemble G. aurita. In addition, some other morphological characters used to separate these species by Verhoeff, such as an incomplete second stria on the collum, varies strongly within the here studied G. aurita specimens. Our studies (Wesener, 2015b; Wesener & Conrad, 2016; this study) confirm that only new collections of these species and subsequent molecular studies will be able to solve the mysteries surroundings the high number of local endemic pill millipedes in northern Italy.
Striation of the thoracic shield
Striation measured in all specimens of Glomeris aurita and Glomeris oblongoguttata, sorted by locality.