Denoising the Denoisers: an independent evaluation of microbiome sequence error-correction approaches

1059 days ago
@SilasKieser @MehrbodEstaki @tpq__ This paper also reported similar observations.https://t.co/FXUPhnF5S2
1268 days ago
@microbeEcology Any time I am asked about this I always refer to the literature - particularly this study: https://t.co/qkjOZnap29
RT @danryo_official: この論文から。まだデータ見てない。 https://t.co/bmnyeUBuF7
この論文から。まだデータ見てない。 https://t.co/bmnyeUBuF7
RT @AudreyBourret: @eric_normandeau Have you seen this paper: https://t.co/0HBvtiaFkr? Personally I'm using DADA2.
@eric_normandeau Have you seen this paper: https://t.co/0HBvtiaFkr? Personally I'm using DADA2.
RT @pacyc1841: Denoising the Denoisers: an independent evaluation of microbiome sequence error-correction approaches [PeerJ] https://t.co/O…
RT @JTNearing: @nickschurch We looked at three different denoising methods in our paper which may help you figure out which one is best for…
RT @JTNearing: @nickschurch We looked at three different denoising methods in our paper which may help you figure out which one is best for…
1683 days ago
@nickschurch We looked at three different denoising methods in our paper which may help you figure out which one is best for your project (: https://t.co/WLLKkMVu6x
1983 days ago
Very nice! Denoising the Denoisers: an independent evaluation of microbiome sequence error-correction approaches https://t.co/RhiBVykcJU
I'm getting crazy with qiime2... this paper gives some light https://t.co/75efANwLGu
Denoising the denoisers: an independent evaluation of microbiome sequence e... - Nearing JT et al. - https://t.co/d0mgMt2URh #microbiome
2053 days ago
RT @MehrbodEstaki: Great comparison of the new Denoisers. https://t.co/tmiO3umU8W. Favorite line at the end "extreme caution is required w…
2053 days ago
RT @MehrbodEstaki: Great comparison of the new Denoisers. https://t.co/tmiO3umU8W. Favorite line at the end "extreme caution is required w…
2053 days ago
RT @MehrbodEstaki: Great comparison of the new Denoisers. https://t.co/tmiO3umU8W. Favorite line at the end "extreme caution is required w…
RT @MehrbodEstaki: Great comparison of the new Denoisers. https://t.co/tmiO3umU8W. Favorite line at the end "extreme caution is required w…
2053 days ago
RT @MehrbodEstaki: Great comparison of the new Denoisers. https://t.co/tmiO3umU8W. Favorite line at the end "extreme caution is required w…
RT @MehrbodEstaki: Great comparison of the new Denoisers. https://t.co/tmiO3umU8W. Favorite line at the end "extreme caution is required w…
2054 days ago
RT @MehrbodEstaki: Great comparison of the new Denoisers. https://t.co/tmiO3umU8W. Favorite line at the end "extreme caution is required w…
Great comparison of the new Denoisers. https://t.co/tmiO3umU8W. Favorite line at the end "extreme caution is required when looking at [..] alpha-diversity metrics between different pipelines."..perhaps an understatement.. @AmyDWillis ?
2058 days ago
RT @thePeerJ: Denoising the Denoisers: an independent evaluation of microbiome sequence error-correction approaches https://t.co/LZSF9zdERz…
2058 days ago
RT @thePeerJ: Denoising the Denoisers: an independent evaluation of microbiome sequence error-correction approaches https://t.co/LZSF9zdERz…
RT @thePeerJ: Denoising the Denoisers: an independent evaluation of microbiome sequence error-correction approaches https://t.co/LZSF9zdERz…
Denoising the Denoisers: an independent evaluation of microbiome sequence error-correction approaches https://t.co/LZSF9zdERz https://t.co/eIT8v65xuH