This was helpfully pointed out by @pdmannion in his reviews of my 2018 revision of Xenoposeidon. (Paper at https://t.co/XvsuQcovnn and peer-review history at https://t.co/P8HX4zjLQ4 including Phil's reviews) [4/n]
This was helpfully pointed out by @pdmannion in his reviews of my 2018 revision of Xenoposeidon. (Paper at https://t.co/XvsuQcovnn and peer-review history at https://t.co/P8HX4zjLQ4 including Phil's reviews) [4/n]
@TetZoo @TwitiGalli Nice to see this! A few tips, @TwitiGalli, in case you do a v2.
* The reconstruction of the missing parts of the vertebra is a bit off. See figure 7 at https://t.co/XvsuQcG6LX
* It would be helpful to show the bones from other specimens, greyed out as in https://t.co/xX1vxl9DDS
Finally, the Rebbachisaurid dinosaur is based on fragmentary remains from the Wessex formation (which includes a scapula and a, if I recall caudal, vertebra.) Xenoposeidon, a Rebbachisaurid from England, was previously classified as a Brachiosaurid. https://t.co/mnHAo9SikG