Important #morphometrics paper by @aemarcy and colleagues showing that lower-res 3-D scans (at 80 microns) of small specimens can still generate accurate shape data. Still, observer error was higher with surface scans than µCT scans.
https://t.co/emgj4LNHHX https://t.co/nlqJxSOl5M
Low resolution scans can provide a sufficiently accurate, cost- and time-effective alternative to high resolution scans for 3D shape analyses https://t.co/aNQZk8xW6Q via @thePeerJ
Low resolution scans can provide a sufficiently accurate, cost- and time-effective alternative to high resolution scans for 3D shape analyses https://t.co/NJsbulqM4q https://t.co/4ZgnY0Vcmx
Low resolution scans can provide a sufficiently accurate, cost- and time-effective alternative to high resolution scans for 3D shape analyses https://t.co/PNxJvGM9Vj