Low resolution scans can provide a sufficiently accurate, cost- and time-effective alternative to high resolution scans for 3D shape analyses

2752 days ago
RT @akiopteryx: Important #morphometrics paper by @aemarcy and colleagues showing that lower-res 3-D scans (at 80 microns) of small specime…
RT @aemarcy: To 3D scan or not to 3D scan? For biologists measuring the shape of small specimens, our new @thePeerJ paper may answer Dr. Ha…
RT @akiopteryx: Important #morphometrics paper by @aemarcy and colleagues showing that lower-res 3-D scans (at 80 microns) of small specime…
RT @akiopteryx: Important #morphometrics paper by @aemarcy and colleagues showing that lower-res 3-D scans (at 80 microns) of small specime…
2752 days ago
RT @akiopteryx: Important #morphometrics paper by @aemarcy and colleagues showing that lower-res 3-D scans (at 80 microns) of small specime…
2753 days ago
RT @akiopteryx: Important #morphometrics paper by @aemarcy and colleagues showing that lower-res 3-D scans (at 80 microns) of small specime…
RT @akiopteryx: Important #morphometrics paper by @aemarcy and colleagues showing that lower-res 3-D scans (at 80 microns) of small specime…
2753 days ago
RT @akiopteryx: Important #morphometrics paper by @aemarcy and colleagues showing that lower-res 3-D scans (at 80 microns) of small specime…
2753 days ago
Important #morphometrics paper by @aemarcy and colleagues showing that lower-res 3-D scans (at 80 microns) of small specimens can still generate accurate shape data. Still, observer error was higher with surface scans than µCT scans. https://t.co/emgj4LNHHX https://t.co/nlqJxSOl5M
Low resolution scans can provide a sufficiently accurate, cost- and time-effective alternative to high resolution scans for 3D shape analyses https://t.co/aNQZk8xW6Q via @thePeerJ
RT @thePeerJ: Low resolution scans can provide a sufficiently accurate, cost- and time-effective alternative to high resolution scans for 3…
2753 days ago
RT @thePeerJ: Low resolution scans can provide a sufficiently accurate, cost- and time-effective alternative to high resolution scans for 3…
Low resolution scans can provide a sufficiently accurate, cost- and time-effective alternative to high resolution scans for 3D shape analyses https://t.co/NJsbulqM4q https://t.co/4ZgnY0Vcmx
RT @ChrisWidga: https://t.co/1f4n23S4xw
2753 days ago
RT @aemarcy: To 3D scan or not to 3D scan? For biologists measuring the shape of small specimens, our new @thePeerJ paper may answer Dr. Ha…
RT @aemarcy: To 3D scan or not to 3D scan? For biologists measuring the shape of small specimens, our new @thePeerJ paper may answer Dr. Ha…
RT @WeisbeckerLab: Ever wondered how your surface scan shapes live up to CT perfection? @aemarcy found @thePeerJ that they're not too bad…
2754 days ago
https://t.co/1f4n23S4xw
RT @Colecionadores2: Low resolution scans can provide a sufficiently accurate, cost- and time-effective alternative to high resolution scan…
RT @Colecionadores2: Low resolution scans can provide a sufficiently accurate, cost- and time-effective alternative to high resolution scan…
RT @aemarcy: To 3D scan or not to 3D scan? For biologists measuring the shape of small specimens, our new @thePeerJ paper may answer Dr. Ha…
Low resolution scans can provide a sufficiently accurate, cost- and time-effective alternative to high resolution scans for 3D shape analyses https://t.co/PNxJvGM9Vj
RT @aemarcy: To 3D scan or not to 3D scan? For biologists measuring the shape of small specimens, our new @thePeerJ paper may answer Dr. Ha…
RT @WeisbeckerLab: Ever wondered how your surface scan shapes live up to CT perfection? @aemarcy found @thePeerJ that they're not too bad…
2755 days ago
RT @WeisbeckerLab: Ever wondered how your surface scan shapes live up to CT perfection? @aemarcy found @thePeerJ that they're not too bad…