Taxonomy annotation and guide tree errors in 16S rRNA databases

View article
2056 days ago
RT @biorxiv_pubd: Taxonomy annotation and guide tree errors in 16S rRNA databases published as: https://t.co/WJtkLWGAE8 @thePeerJ #biorxiv
reply repost on X like
Taxonomy annotation and guide tree errors in 16S rRNA databases published as: https://t.co/WJtkLWGAE8 @thePeerJ #biorxiv
reply repost on X like
RT @RobertEdgarPhD: New paper shows that ~20% of SILVA and Greengenes taxonomy annotations are wrong and their guide trees have low accurac…
reply repost on X like
2184 days ago
RT @RobertEdgarPhD: New paper shows that ~20% of SILVA and Greengenes taxonomy annotations are wrong and their guide trees have low accurac…
reply repost on X like
2383 days ago
RT @RobertEdgarPhD: New paper shows that ~20% of SILVA and Greengenes taxonomy annotations are wrong and their guide trees have low accurac…
reply repost on X like
RT @RobertEdgarPhD: New paper shows that ~20% of SILVA and Greengenes taxonomy annotations are wrong and their guide trees have low accurac…
reply repost on X like
2484 days ago
RT @Falk_tw: That 16S tax databases are not perfect.. known problem. They have been improved significantly in the last years, but this work…
reply repost on X like
2484 days ago
That 16S tax databases are not perfect.. known problem. They have been improved significantly in the last years, but this work by Robert @RobertEdgarPhD is showing a persisting problem with our reference taxonomies. What's your take? https://t.co/AtsujOdlJD
reply repost on X like
2548 days ago
@jcmcnick @ace_gtdb This paper https://t.co/XKupyH5gLc by @RobertEdgarPhD i found useful in in understanding db annotation error and classifier. He has other papers making much needed comparisons for us students.
reply repost on X like
2615 days ago
rRNAのデータベース (SILVA，Greengenes)の分類アノテーションの2割弱は間違ってる.. Taxonomy and tree errors https://t.co/QBzFQ9mHao @thePeerJさんから
reply repost on X like
RT @RobertEdgarPhD: New paper shows that ~20% of SILVA and Greengenes taxonomy annotations are wrong and their guide trees have low accurac…
reply repost on X like
In mood for some 16S rRNA taxonomy evaluation papers? While you wait for a peer reviewed version of this one: https://t.co/cpbNpmpzK2 you can still read this one: https://t.co/Mn1Ium3rZp
reply repost on X like
2688 days ago
"249,490 identical sequences with conflicting annotations... at ranks up to phylum... annotation error rate in these (16S) databases is ∼17%."
reply repost on X like
2727 days ago
RT @RobertEdgarPhD: New paper shows that ~20% of SILVA and Greengenes taxonomy annotations are wrong and their guide trees have low accurac…
reply repost on X like
RT @RobertEdgarPhD: New paper shows that ~20% of SILVA and Greengenes taxonomy annotations are wrong and their guide trees have low accurac…
reply repost on X like
RT @RobertEdgarPhD: New paper shows that ~20% of SILVA and Greengenes taxonomy annotations are wrong and their guide trees have low accurac…
reply repost on X like
2772 days ago
RT @RobertEdgarPhD: New paper shows that ~20% of SILVA and Greengenes taxonomy annotations are wrong and their guide trees have low accurac…
reply repost on X like
RT @RobertEdgarPhD: New paper shows that ~20% of SILVA and Greengenes taxonomy annotations are wrong and their guide trees have low accurac…
reply repost on X like
RT @RobertEdgarPhD: New paper shows that ~20% of SILVA and Greengenes taxonomy annotations are wrong and their guide trees have low accurac…
reply repost on X like
RT @RobertEdgarPhD: New paper shows that ~20% of SILVA and Greengenes taxonomy annotations are wrong and their guide trees have low accurac…
reply repost on X like
RT @RobertEdgarPhD: New paper shows that ~20% of SILVA and Greengenes taxonomy annotations are wrong and their guide trees have low accurac…
reply repost on X like
RT @RobertEdgarPhD: New paper shows that ~20% of SILVA and Greengenes taxonomy annotations are wrong and their guide trees have low accurac…
reply repost on X like
RT @RobertEdgarPhD: New paper shows that ~20% of SILVA and Greengenes taxonomy annotations are wrong and their guide trees have low accurac…
reply repost on X like
RT @RobertEdgarPhD: New paper shows that ~20% of SILVA and Greengenes taxonomy annotations are wrong and their guide trees have low accurac…
reply repost on X like
RT @RobertEdgarPhD: New paper shows that ~20% of SILVA and Greengenes taxonomy annotations are wrong and their guide trees have low accurac…
reply repost on X like