Regenerative agriculture: merging farming and natural resource conservation profitably

RT @TamarHaspel: Feeding people is all trade-offs, all the time. In this study, "regenerative" farms were better on a lot of metrics, incl…
624 days ago
RT @agronomistag: Lots of people impressed with this. What Sam failed to mention is that “none of these pests [in either system] were at ec…
RT @agronomistag: Lots of people impressed with this. What Sam failed to mention is that “none of these pests [in either system] were at ec…
625 days ago
RT @agronomistag: Lots of people impressed with this. What Sam failed to mention is that “none of these pests [in either system] were at ec…
625 days ago
RT @TamarHaspel: Feeding people is all trade-offs, all the time. In this study, "regenerative" farms were better on a lot of metrics, incl…
RT @TamarHaspel: Feeding people is all trade-offs, all the time. In this study, "regenerative" farms were better on a lot of metrics, incl…
RT @agronomistag: Lots of people impressed with this. What Sam failed to mention is that “none of these pests [in either system] were at ec…
RT @agronomistag: Lots of people impressed with this. What Sam failed to mention is that “none of these pests [in either system] were at ec…
RT @agronomistag: Lots of people impressed with this. What Sam failed to mention is that “none of these pests [in either system] were at ec…
RT @agronomistag: Lots of people impressed with this. What Sam failed to mention is that “none of these pests [in either system] were at ec…
RT @agronomistag: Lots of people impressed with this. What Sam failed to mention is that “none of these pests [in either system] were at ec…
626 days ago
RT @agronomistag: Lots of people impressed with this. What Sam failed to mention is that “none of these pests [in either system] were at ec…
626 days ago
RT @agronomistag: Lots of people impressed with this. What Sam failed to mention is that “none of these pests [in either system] were at ec…
RT @TamarHaspel: Feeding people is all trade-offs, all the time. In this study, "regenerative" farms were better on a lot of metrics, incl…
RT @agronomistag: Lots of people impressed with this. What Sam failed to mention is that “none of these pests [in either system] were at ec…
RT @agronomistag: Lots of people impressed with this. What Sam failed to mention is that “none of these pests [in either system] were at ec…
RT @agronomistag: Lots of people impressed with this. What Sam failed to mention is that “none of these pests [in either system] were at ec…
RT @agronomistag: Lots of people impressed with this. What Sam failed to mention is that “none of these pests [in either system] were at ec…
RT @agronomistag: Lots of people impressed with this. What Sam failed to mention is that “none of these pests [in either system] were at ec…
Lots of people impressed with this. What Sam failed to mention is that “none of these pests [in either system] were at economically damaging levels.” The conventional farms did not spray insecticides so the 10-fold difference doesn't matter. https://t.co/mbe2H7vcdH https://t.co/1tWKsZcID5
RT @TamarHaspel: Feeding people is all trade-offs, all the time. In this study, "regenerative" farms were better on a lot of metrics, incl…
RT @TamarHaspel: Feeding people is all trade-offs, all the time. In this study, "regenerative" farms were better on a lot of metrics, incl…
626 days ago
RT @TamarHaspel: Feeding people is all trade-offs, all the time. In this study, "regenerative" farms were better on a lot of metrics, incl…
Feeding people is all trade-offs, all the time. In this study, "regenerative" farms were better on a lot of metrics, including profitability. BUT There was a 29% yield penalty. That means we need 40% more land to produce the same amount of food. https://t.co/44tDH7bK5r https://t.co/DJ4XUeJQxD
RT @samdknowlton: @KintalineFarm https://t.co/Oz7AFy7uiP