Academics at high-ranking institutions pay relatively higher fees for gold access and hybrid open access publications.
The inequalities of academic publishing, and consequently of science, are becoming more and more complex.
https://t.co/vNr6Bg5xDf
Good job @KyleSiler @stefhaustein 'Authorial and institutional stratification in open access publishing: the case of global health research' was top 5 most viewed #ScienceMedicalEducation and #SciencePolicy, @thePeerJ journal 2018!
Authorial and institutional stratification in open access publishing: the case of global health research @thepeerj https://t.co/hl0jiILPdV Authors affiliated with high-ranked and well-funded institutions tend to have more resources to choose pay options with publishing.
Authorial and institutional stratification in open access publishing: the case of global health research https://t.co/PZHXLawgxe https://t.co/9yiSyg3NPZ
Thoughtful and empirical paper on the new status hierarchies are emerging around OA, difference between public and academic facing organisations is troubling, will the two simply split? https://t.co/rtKlCmYBrc via @thePeerJ
"Findings show that authors working at lower-ranked universities are more likely to publish in closed/paywalled outlets, and less likely to choose outlets that involve some sort of APC."- https://t.co/TYRRHVthUI #OA #openaccess
Some empirical research suggesting a relationship between OA publishing habits and scholars' material realities: I appreciate the turn to questioning the structural inequality of APCs but I want so much more https://t.co/I88fFUyYBB