Accuracy of microbial community diversity estimated by closed- and open-reference OTUs

View article
UNCROSS: Filtering of high-frequency cross-talk in 16S amplicon reads published as: https://t.co/9fMl3LPTXY @thePeerJ #biorxiv
reply repost on X like
2794 days ago
https://t.co/9zS4HNOELT
reply repost on X like
RT @NoahFierer: Do you use QIIME? If so - this is worth reading - pretty damning: https://t.co/372rE5VDGr
reply repost on X like
2873 days ago
RT @bejcal: Different V-regions of the _same_ 16S gene are mapped to _different_ closed-ref OTUs -- in most cases! https://t.co/6DmX6oGXT6…
reply repost on X like
2873 days ago
RT @bejcal: Different V-regions of the _same_ 16S gene are mapped to _different_ closed-ref OTUs -- in most cases! https://t.co/6DmX6oGXT6…
reply repost on X like
2 of the top 5 @thePeerJ Microbiology papers of 2017... Accuracy of closed/open-reference OTUs https://t.co/q3ECJyWpq6 A microbial survey of the ISS. https://t.co/1vLxpVqOqB
reply repost on X like
RT @RobertEdgarPhD: New paper https://t.co/1GsqEJBMWq shows low quality of QIIME closed- and open-reference OTUs.
reply repost on X like
RT @RobertEdgarPhD: New paper https://t.co/1GsqEJBMWq shows low quality of QIIME closed- and open-reference OTUs.
reply repost on X like
2965 days ago
RT @RobertEdgarPhD: New paper https://t.co/1GsqEJBMWq shows low quality of QIIME closed- and open-reference OTUs.
reply repost on X like
2965 days ago
RT @RobertEdgarPhD: New paper https://t.co/1GsqEJBMWq shows low quality of QIIME closed- and open-reference OTUs.
reply repost on X like
2976 days ago
RT @NoahFierer: Do you use QIIME? If so - this is worth reading - pretty damning: https://t.co/372rE5VDGr
reply repost on X like
2978 days ago
RT @Naveen_Jain_CEO: This study shows that 16s technology used by companies like Ubiome is a complete waste of money. https://t.co/zy8BiAuI…
reply repost on X like
2994 days ago
RT @MicrobiomDigest: Accuracy of microbial community diversity estimated by closed- and open-reference OTUs https://t.co/ST9db65EmG https:/…
reply repost on X like
2998 days ago
Sad to see PR put before science by Viome. Not what the paper says and method is not used by uBiome #sciencebeforepr https://t.co/Oug8AAyhCH
reply repost on X like
RT @Naveen_Jain_CEO: This study shows that 16s technology used by companies like Ubiome is a complete waste of money. https://t.co/zy8BiAuI…
reply repost on X like
RT @MicrobiomDigest: Accuracy of microbial community diversity estimated by closed- and open-reference OTUs https://t.co/ST9db65EmG https:/…
reply repost on X like
2999 days ago
RT @Naveen_Jain_CEO: This study shows that 16s technology used by companies like Ubiome is a complete waste of money. https://t.co/zy8BiAuI…
reply repost on X like
2999 days ago
RT @Naveen_Jain_CEO: This study shows that 16s technology used by companies like Ubiome is a complete waste of money. https://t.co/zy8BiAuI…
reply repost on X like
RT @Naveen_Jain_CEO: This study shows that 16s technology used by companies like Ubiome is a complete waste of money. https://t.co/zy8BiAuI…
reply repost on X like
RT @Naveen_Jain_CEO: This study shows that 16s technology used by companies like Ubiome is a complete waste of money. https://t.co/zy8BiAuI…
reply repost on X like
RT @Naveen_Jain_CEO: This study shows that 16s technology used by companies like Ubiome is a complete waste of money. https://t.co/zy8BiAuI…
reply repost on X like
2999 days ago
RT @Naveen_Jain_CEO: This study shows that 16s technology used by companies like Ubiome is a complete waste of money. https://t.co/zy8BiAuI…
reply repost on X like
This study shows that 16s technology used by companies like Ubiome is a complete waste of money. https://t.co/zy8BiAuIaI via @thePeerJ
reply repost on X like
3000 days ago
RT @NoahFierer: Do you use QIIME? If so - this is worth reading - pretty damning: https://t.co/372rE5VDGr
reply repost on X like
3005 days ago
RT @MicrobiomDigest: Accuracy of microbial community diversity estimated by closed- and open-reference OTUs https://t.co/ST9db65EmG https:/…
reply repost on X like