Visitors   Views   Downloads
PEER-REVIEWED

Introduction

Calcium ion (Ca2+) plays pivotal roles in mediating and regulating many fundamental growth and developmental processes and in response to various environmental stimuli (Luan, 2009; Kudla, Batistič & Hashimoto, 2010; Sarwat et al., 2013). The Ca2+ signals are primarily perceived by some Ca2+ sensors including Ca2+ dependent protein kinases, calmodulins and calcineurin B-like proteins (CBLs), and then are transmitted by these sensors to downstream targets to initiate diverse cellular responses (Luan, 2009; Kudla, Batistič & Hashimoto, 2010; Sarwat et al., 2013).

CBLs are proteins sharing sequence similarity with the B subunit of calcineurin B in yeast and neuronal calcium sensors in animals (Kudla et al., 1999). Each CBL has at least three EF domains and Ca2+-binding sites (Mohanta et al., 2015; Mao et al., 2016). CBLs relay Ca2+ signals through interaction with and activation of the CBL-interacting protein kinases (CIPKs). Moreover, CBL-CIPK has been demonstrated to serve as an essential signaling network regulating plant responses to multiple abiotic stresses such as salinity, K+ deficiency, excess of Mg2+ and drought (Sanyal, Pandey & Pandey, 2015; Thoday-Kennedy, Jacobs & Roy, 2015; Mao et al., 2016). It also modulates growth and development, absorption and/or transport of nitrate, ammonium and iron, sustaining of H+ homeostasis, and transduction of reactive oxygen species signals in plants (Sanyal, Pandey & Pandey, 2015; Thoday-Kennedy, Jacobs & Roy, 2015; Mao et al., 2016).

In Arabidopsis, 10 genes (CBL1-10) encoding CBL proteins have been found (Kolukisaoglu et al., 2004). CBL1 and CBL9 were reported to positively regulate the uptake and transport of K+, NO3, NH4+, aluminum and iron, and the promotion of stomatal opening (Li et al., 2006; Xu et al., 2006; Ho et al., 2009; Mao et al., 2016; Tian et al., 2016; Ligaba-Osena et al., 2017; Straub, Ludewig & Neuhäuser, 2017). CBL1 and CBL9 also affect abscisic acid (ABA)-induced stomatal closure and ROS signaling (Pandey et al., 2004; Cheong et al., 2007; Drerup et al., 2013). CBL2 plays a negative role in the activation of plasma membrane (PM) H+-ATPase (Fuglsang et al., 2007). Moreover, CBL2 and CBL3 are cooperatively implicated in sequestering Mg2+ and modulation of pollen germination and tube growth (Steinhorst et al., 2015; Tang et al., 2015). CBL3 are also engaged in K+ distribution and translocation (Liu et al., 2013). CBL4 was proven to be a crucial regulator for excluding Na+ and translocation of AKT2 (Arabidopsis K+ transporter 2) from endoplasmic reticulum to PM (Held et al., 2011). CBL10 is involved in enhancing salt tolerance, stimulating K+ absorption, and modulating GTPase activity (Kim et al., 2007; Ren et al., 2013; Cho et al., 2016). In cotton (Gossypium hirsutum), GhCBL2 and GhCBL3 appear to modulate fiber elongation (Gao et al., 2008). Many CBLs in other plant species also play important parts in regulating the responses to various abiotic stress as well as growth and development (Li et al., 2014a; Thoday-Kennedy, Jacobs & Roy, 2015).

In recent years, multiple CBL gene families have been identified at genome-wide levels in rice, maize, wheat and other plants (Kolukisaoglu et al., 2004; Zhang et al., 2014; Sun et al., 2015; Li et al., 2016a; Li et al., 2016b; Zhang et al., 2016). Some conserved domains such as EF-hands, myristoylation and palmitoylation sites were discovered in CBLs (Kolukisaoglu et al., 2004; Mohanta et al., 2015). The expression patterns of many CBL genes were also investigated in different tissues and in response to various abiotic stresses in plants (Mohanta et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2016). These findings lay the foundation for people to further explore the functional mechanisms of CBLs in plants. However, to date, knowledge about genomics and evolutionary information of CBLs in Gossypium is limited.

Cotton is an essential tetraploid fiber crop that supplies lint for the textile industry worldwide. It is considered to descend from an ancestral combination of two diploid most similar to modern A (for example Gossypium arboretum) and D genome species (Gossypium raimondii) (Wendel, Brubaker & Seelanan, 2010).

Cotton growth and development are severely threatened by diverse abiotic stresses such as drought, salinity and potassium starvation (Allen, 2010). Therefore, enhancing stress tolerance of cotton cultivars is one of most important strategies for us to improve their productivity and quality. Potassium is a vital macronutrient for plants, especially for cotton. Potassium shortage in soil seriously affects the yield and quality of cotton (Oosterhuis, Loka & Raper, 2013). Moreover, it has been demonstrated that K+ uptake is controlled by CBLs through interacting with CIPK23 in Arabidopsis and rice under potassium deficiency (Li et al., 2014a; Mao et al., 2016). Research is needed to determine which and how CBLs modulate K+ absorption in cotton. In this report, genome-wide and comprehensive analyses of the CBL family in G. arboreum, G. raimondii and G. hirsutum were conducted. The expression patterns of GhCBLs were monitored in tissues and in response to potassium deficiency in cotton. These analyses will provide a basis for further investigation of the functions of CBLs in Gossypium.

Materials and Methods

Identification of CBL family in Gossypium

The genome sequences of G. arboreum (BGI-CGB v2.0 assembly genome), G. raimondii (JGI assembly v2.0 data.) and G. hirsutum (NAU-NBI v1.1 assembly genome) were downloaded from the CottonGen database (www.cottongen.org), respectively. The protein sequences of 10 Arabidopsis CBLs were applied as queries to search the three genomes using BLAST-2.4.0 software (ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/executables/blast+/LATEST) with default parameters (E-value <  e−10). EF-hand domains, the typical CBL domains, were analyzed within the candidate CBLs one by one using online software SMART (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/). The CBL motifs were also queried against the Pfam databases (Finn et al., 2010). The putative CBLs with questionable annotations (i.e., having a typical CBL domain but low E-value or low coverage of a domain) were manually reanalyzed.

Analysis of Gossypium CBLs family

The properties of the Gossypium CBL proteins were analyzed using online tools ExPaSy (http://web.expasy.org/protparam/). The subcellular localizations of the CBLs were examined in the website http://www.csbio.sjtu.edu.cn/bioinf/Cell-PLoc/. The locations of the CBLs in chromosomes were assessed by MapInspect software (http://www.softsea.com/review/MapInspect.html). Structures of the CBLs were determined by GSDS (http://gsds.cbi.pku.edu.cn/). The conserved domains in the CBLs were affirmed by SMART (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de). The sequence logo of myristoylation motif in the CBLs was generated by MEME program (http://meme-suite.org/tools/meme).

Analyses of synteny and Ka/Ks ratio

The homologous gene pairs among the Gossypium CBLs were searched by the MCScanx software (http://chibba.pgml.uga.edu/mcscan2/). The gene collinearity results were obtained by CIRCOS program (http://www.circos.ca/). The ratio of Ka (nonsynonymous substitution rate) to Ks (synonymous substitution rate) of the CBL genes were estimated by PAML program (http://abacus.gene.ucl.ac.uk/software/paml.html).

Phylogenetic analysis of CBLs

The CBL data were downloaded from the websites for various plant species including Arabidopsis thaliana (http://www.arabidopsis.org/), Oryza sativa (http://rapdb.dna.affrc.go.jp), Vitis vinifera (http://www.genoscope.cns.fr/spip/Vitis-vinifera-e.html), Populus trichocarpa (http://www.phytozome.net/poplar), Glycine max (http://www.phytozome.net/soybean), Theobroma cacao (http://cocoagendb.cirad.fr), Carica papaya (http://www.hawaii.edu/microbiology/asgpb/) and castor bean (http://castorbean.jcvi.org). The full-length amino acid sequences of CBL proteins were aligned using Clustal W software through pairwise and multiple alignment with default parameters (Larkin et al., 2007). Then, phylogenetic trees were generated based on the alignment results using the neighbor joining method (Neighbor-Joining, NJ) and 1,000 bootstrap trials with the MEGA 5.0 software (http://www.megasoftware.net/).

Expression analysis of GhCBL genes in tissues and in response to potassium deficiency

For measuring the expression of the GhCBLs in tissues, samples of roots, stems and leaves were collected from 20-day-old G. hirsutum TM-1 plants normally grown in soil containing 1:1 (v:v) peat:vermiculite in a growth chamber (day/night temperature cycle of 28°C/26°C, 14 h light/10 h dark, and about 50% relative humidity). Flowers were isolated in the morning at the first day of anthesis from cotton grown in the field. The fibers at elongation stage were obtained from the ovules (23 days post anthesis). For monitoring the expression of GhCBLs in responding to potassium deprivation, cotton plants grew in clean small pebbles (watered by liquid 1/2 MS medium) (Murashige & Skoog, 1962) in the growth chamber described above for 3 weeks. Then, the plants were watered with K+-lacking liquid 1/2 MS medium (KNO3 was replaced by NH4NO3 and KH2PO4 was replaced by NH4H2PO4) for 0 h, 6 h, 2 d and 5 d, respectively. Meanwhile, some K+-starved seedlings for 5 d were resupplied with K+ (watered with K+-contained 1/2 MS medium) for 3 h. The cotton roots were collected, immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −70°C. Total RNA of samples was extracted using RNA Pure Plant Kit’s protocol (Tiangen Biotech, Beijing, China). The purity of RNA was examined using a Nanodrop2000 nucleic acid analyzer. The A260/280 ratio for each RNA sample was about 2.0. Then, total cDNA was synthesized using M-MLV reserve transcriptase synthesis system (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) following the instructions in the Promega kit (https://tools.thermofisher.com/content/sfs/manuals/superscriptIII_man.pdf).

Table 1:
Gene primers used for quantitative real-time RT-PCR experiments.
Genes AGI number Forward primers (5′–3′) Reverse primers (5′–3′)
GhUBQ7 Gh_A11G0969 GAAGGCATTCCACCTGACCAAC CTTGACCTTCTTCTTCTTGTGCTTG
GhCBL1-1 Gh_A11G0257 GAGCGTAACGAGGTCAAGCAAA CTTCCCGTCCTGATTAATGTCC
GhCBL1-2 Gh_D11G0276 TTTTGTTCGAGCACTCAATGTTT TTGCCTCAATCGTTTCATCAG
GhCBL1-3 Gh_A03G0043 GACATTCTTGGAAGCCGATA CTGAGGTATGGGAGGGTCAT
GhCBL1-4 Gh_D09G1875 AGAGTAATGACCCTCCCATACCTAA CGAGCGAGTATTCTCCGACAA
GhCBL1-5 Gh_A09G1766 GGATGCCGACACTAACCAGG TCCAACAACGTAGCGGCC
GhCBL3-1 Gh_A01G0740 AGTTTGCTCGTGCTCTCTCTGT ATCATCTGAAAGGTTCATGCCA
GhCBL3-2 Gh_D01G0760 GCAAGAGAGACCGTTTTTAGTG AATCTTATCGTCAATGGGCG
GhCBL3-3 Gh_A13G1099 GGGCTGATTAACAAGGAGGAGT ACAGAAAGAGCACGAGCAAACT
GhCBL3-4 Gh_D13G1364 ATGGGCTGATTAACAAGGAGGAG GACAGAAAGAGCACGAGCGAAC
GhCBL3-5 Gh_A04G0051 GCGGTGATAGATGACGGACT GACAGAGAGAGCACGAGCAA
GhCBL3-6 Gh_D05G3682 TACACGCTTCCGACCCTATT ATCAATGAGCCCGTCGTAAC
GhCBL4-1 Gh_A11G0126 ACGGCTAGTGAAGTAGAATCCC CGAACAAATCAAAAACCCTGTC
GhCBL4-2 Gh_D11G0140 TTCTTGCTGCTGAAACACCT CGAACAAATCAAAAACCCTG
GhCBL4-3 Gh_A12G2144 TAAGCGTCTTTCATCCCAAC TGATTCACCAAGCAGAGCCA
GhCBL4-4 Gh_A09G1696 AACTTAGACACAAGGCTGGGTATG GAGGTTCTGCTTATTGCTGTTTTT
GhCBL4-5 Gh_D12G2320 CCTGAGGAGGTCAAGGAGATG AAATTGGGTTGCGAGCTACAAA
GhCBL9 Gh_D08G1764 GACATTCTTGGATGCCGACA ACGCAGCAACCTCGTCTACT
GhCBL10-1 Gh_A06G0800 AGTCTCACAGTGGCGGCA TTCATTGGCAAGACGGGTAA
GhCBL10-2 Gh_D06G0922 GTCGCGAGAAATGCCGTTAT ATTCTCGCCGTATGGAGTTTG
GhCBL10-3 Gh_A05G0335 CTGAAATGAATTTGTCCGATGAC ACTGGAAATAGTAGTTCATCACGGA
GhCBL10-4 Gh_D05G0440 TCTGGAATGAATTTGTCGGATG CTGGAAATAGGAGTTCTTCACGG
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.3653/table-1
Table 2:
Gene primers used for yeast two-hybrid experiments.
Genes AGI number Forward primers (5′–3′) Reverse primers (5′–3′)
GhCBL1-2(BD) Gh_D11G0276 CCGGAATTCATGGGCTGCTTTCAATCT CGCGGATCCTGTGGCAACCTCATCA
GhCBL1-3(BD) Gh_A03G0043 CCGGAATTCATGGGTTGCTTTCATTCT CGCGGATCCAGTGGCAACTTCATCTAC
GhCBL1-4(BD) Gh_D09G1875 CGCGGATCCATGGGCTGCTTGCAATGTAAA GCACTGCAGTATGCCATTCGCCGAGCGAGT
GhCBL1-5(BD) Gh_A09G1766 ATAGGATCCATGGGCTGCTTGCAATGTA GCACTGCAGGTATAACATCGGTATTATGTACCT
GhCBL3-2(BD) Gh_D01G0760 CGCGGATCCATGTTGCAGTGCATAGAC GCACTGCAGTGTATCATCAACTTGAGAGTGGAAAA
GhCBL3-4(BD) Gh_D13G1364 CGCGGATCCATGGGAATTTGTTGTTTT GCACTGCAGTTTGCCACCCATATTCAACT
GhCBL4-1(BD) Gh_A11G0126 CGCGGATCCATGAAATGGTGTTTTCAAACT GCACTGCAGATCTCCATTGACGGAGACGCT
GhCBL4-3(BD) Gh_A12G2144 CGCGGATCCATGGGTTGTTTTTGCTTG GCACTGCAGCTTATTCCCAACGATTTCAGCT
GhCBL4-4(BD) Gh_A09G1696 CGCGGATCCATGGGCTGCTTTTGCTTG GCACTGCAGGTTTTTTCTCAATTCTTCACTGGT
GhCBL8(BD) Gh_D09G1801 CGCGGATCCATGGGCTGCTTTTGCTTGAAGAA GCACTGCAGATTCTTCACTGGTTGCTGCAAATCTGAGAC
GhCBL9(BD) Gh_D08G1764 CCGGAATTCATGGGCTGCTTTCATTCT CGCGGATCCCGCAGCAACCTCGTCTA
GhCBL10-3(BD) Gh_A05G0335 CGCGGATCCATGGATTCAACTAGCAAAACC GCACTGCAGCCGGAGATAGGAAAGGGCCAA
GhCIPK23(AD) Gh_A06G1219 CCGGAATTCATGGCGAATCGCACTAGT CGCGGATCCACCATCCTTTTCTTCCAC
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.3653/table-2
Table 3:
The CBL family genes in Gossypium.
Gene name Gene ID pI MW (kDa) Hydrophilicity Predicted subcellular localization Amino acid residues Coding sequence
GaCBL1-1 Cotton_A_16036 4.74 24.33 −0.163 Cell membrane 213 642
GaCBL1-2 Cotton_A_16034 4.74 24.33 −0.163 Cell membrane 213 642
GaCBL1-3 Cotton_A_16590 5.06 25.39 −0.216 Cell membrane 221 666
GaCBL1-4 Cotton_A_09151 4.72 24.39 −0.142 Cell membrane 213 642
GaCBL2 Cotton_A_07469 4.78 25.94 −0.2 Cell membrane 226 681
GaCBL3-1 Cotton_A_06492 4.77 25.98 −0.189 Cell membrane 226 681
GaCBL3-2 Cotton_A_02147 5.08 27.68 −0.314 Cell membrane 240 723
GaCBL4-1 Cotton_A_02388 4.81 24.88 −0.13 Cell membrane 220 663
GaCBL4-2 Cotton_A_13237 4.97 24.47 −0.173 Cell membrane 215 648
GaCBL8 Cotton_A_08153 4.89 23.48 −0.134 Cell membrane 205 618
GaCBL9 Cotton_A_13238 4.65 24.22 −0.141 Cell membrane 210 633
GaCBL10-1 Cotton_A_14000 4.55 23.25 −0.175 Cell membrane 199 600
GaCBL10-2 Cotton_A_34841 4.82 32.43 −0.028 Cell membrane 279 840
GrCBL1-1 Gorai.007G030300 4.72 24.38 −0.143 Cell membrane 213 642
GrCBL1-2 Gorai.003G178700 4.71 24.45 0.075 Cell membrane 214 645
GrCBL1-3 Gorai.004G191400 4.67 23.86 0.016 Cell membrane 209 630
GrCBL1-4 Gorai.006G214700 4.99 25.39 −0.226 Cell membrane 221 666
GrCBL3-1 Gorai.013G150400 4.79 25.96 −0.208 Cell membrane 226 681
GrCBL3-2 Gorai.002G102900 4.77 25.98 −0.189 Cell membrane 226 681
GrCBL3-3 Gorai.009G450400 4.84 23.25 −0.21 Cell membrane 226 681
GrCBL4-1 Gorai.007G015400 4.78 24.91 −0.193 Cell membrane 233 702
GrCBL4-2 Gorai.006G207100 4.98 25.26 −0.161 Cell membrane 221 666
GrCBL4-3 Gorai.008G255900 5.11 24.02 −0.161 Cell membrane 211 636
GrCBL9 Gorai.008G255800 4.66 24.58 −0.139 Cell membrane 213 642
GrCBL10-1 Gorai.010G101400 4.74 29.26 −0.096 Cell membrane 252 759
GrCBL10-2 Gorai.009G045600 4.83 29.23 −0.095 Cell membrane 253 762
GhCBL1-1 Gh_A11G0257 4.72 24.44 −0.148 Cell membrane 213 642
GhCBL1-2 Gh_D11G0276 4.79 24.38 −0.145 Cell membrane 213 642
GhCBL1-3 Gh_A03G0043 4.98 22.76 −0.163 Cell membrane 199 600
GhCBL1-4 Gh_D09G1875 5.06 25.69 −0.194 Cell membrane 224 675
GhCBL1-5 Gh_A09G1766 5.51 23.23 −0.165 Cell membrane 200 603
GhCBL3-1 Gh_A01G0740 4.77 25.98 −0.189 Cell membrane 226 681
GhCBL3-2 Gh_D01G0760 4.77 25.99 −0.189 Cell membrane 226 681
GhCBL3-3 Gh_A13G1099 4.84 23.25 −0.21 Cell membrane 202 609
GhCBL3-4 Gh_D13G1364 4.98 21.64 −0.205 Cell membrane 189 570
GhCBL3-5 Gh_A04G0051 5.14 21.76 −0.274 Cell membrane 189 570
GhCBL3-6 Gh_D05G3682 8.05 150.21 −0.284 Nucleus 1,326 3,981
GhCBL4-1 Gh_A11G0126 4.77 23.01 −0.059 Cell membrane 201 606
GhCBL4-2 Gh_D11G0140 4.82 24.97 −0.185 Cell membrane 220 663
GhCBL4-3 Gh_A12G2144 4.97 24.5 −0.175 Cell membrane 215 648
GhCBL4-4 Gh_A09G1696 5.27 28.4 −0.184 Cell membrane 248 747
GhCBL4-5 Gh_D12G2320 5.64 25.06 0.023 Cell membrane 218 657
GhCBL8 Gh_D09G1801 4.85 24.74 −0.177 Cell membrane 217 654
GhCBL9 Gh_D08G1764 4.74 23.8 −0.032 Cell membrane 209 630
GhCBL10-1 Gh_A06G0800 5.18 33.56 −0.143 Cell membrane 293 882
GhCBL10-2 Gh_D06G0922 4.95 30.41 −0.159 Cell membrane 265 798
GhCBL10-3 Gh_A05G0335 5.16 30.48 −0.114 Cell membrane 262 789
GhCBL10-4 Gh_D05G0440 5.01 30.25 −0.08 Cell membrane 262 789
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.3653/table-3

Quantitative real-time RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) experiments were performed using the cDNA, SYBR Green Master mix, the specific primers of GhCBL genes (Table 1), and an ABI 7500 real-time PCR system. GhUBQ7 was used as the internal control. At least three biological replicates were carried out.

Yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) analysis

The full-length CDS sequences of GhCBLs and GhCIPK23 genes were amplified, sequenced and cloned into pGBKT7 and pGADT7 vectors, respectively, using primers listed in Table 2. The plasmids were then transformed into yeast strain AH109 according to the method described in page 18–21 in Yeast Protocols Handbook (Clontech, http://www.clontech.com/xxclt_searchResults.jsp). The cotransformants were plated on non-selective SD/-Leu/-Trp (synthetic dropout medium without Leu and Trp) solid medium and selective SD/-Leu/-Trp/-His/-Ade solid medium. The medium was prepared by ourselves. The concentrations of each component for SD/-Leu/-Trp medium are as follows: L-isoleucine 300 mg/L, L-valine 1.5 g/L, adenine 200 mg/L, L-arginine 200 mg/L, L-lysine 300 mg/L, L-methionine 200 mg/L, L-phenylalanine 500 mg/L, L-threonine 2 g/L, L-tyrosine 300 mg/L, L-histidine 200 mg/L, uracil 200 mg/L, yeast nitrogen base without amino acids 6.7 g/L, glucose 20 g/L. Serial 1:10 dilutions of the cotransformants were made in water, and 2 µl of the dilution was dropped to generate one spot. Plates were incubated at 30°C for 3-4 d. 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indoxyl- α-D-galactopyranoside (X- α-Gal) staining assay was carried out following the instruction (the Clontech protocol, page 26).

Results

Genome-wide identification of the CBL family in two progenitor diploid and the tetraploid cotton species

The CBL genes in Gossypium were identified using the homologous alignment method. A total of 13, 13, and 22 CBL genes were respectively detected in A genome (G. arboretum), D genome (G. raimondii) and AtDt genome (G. hirsutum) using 10 Arabidopsis CBL protein sequences as queries (Table 3). Further, the CBL candidate genes in Gossypium were confirmed by domain analysis programs of Pfam and SMART. The CBL family members were named according to their orthologous similarity to the 10 Arabidopsis CBL proteins (Mohanta et al., 2015). In general, the CBLs in G. arboretum, G. raimondii and G. hirsutum were named GaCBLs, GrCBLs and GhCBLs, respectively.

Most CBLs had very similar physical properties in the 3 Gossypium plants (Table 3). The open reading frame (ORF) lengths of the CBL genes ranged from 570 bp to 882 bp except that of GhCBL3-6, whose ORF length was 3981 bp. The GaCBL and GrCBL proteins contained 199-279 and 209-253 amino acids (AA), respectively, while GhCBLs were composed of 189-293 AA except GhCBL3-6, which consisted of 1326 AA. The molecular weights (MWs) of GaCBLs varied from 23.25 kDa (GaCBL10-1) to 32.43 kDa (GaCBL10-2), and of GrCBLs ranged from 23.25 kDa (GrCBL3-3) to 29.26 kDa (GrCBL10-1). The sizes of GhCBLs were 21.64 kDa (GhCBL3-4) to 33.56 kDa (GhCBL10-1) with an exception of GhCBL3-6 (150.21 kDa). The theoretical isoelectric point (pI) is small for overwhelming majority of the CBLs, ranging from 4.65 (GaCBL9) to 5.64 (GhCBL4-5). By contrast, pI of GhCBL3-6 was 8.05 (Table 3).

Putative subcellular localizations of the Gossypium CBL proteins were also analyzed. It was predicted that all of CBLs were located in cell membrane except that GhCBL3-6 was in the nucleus (Table 3). The quite different characteristics of GhCBL3-6 from other members suggest that GhCBL3-6 likely plays a special role in cotton.

Distribution of the Gossypium CBL family members in the whole genome

Chromosomal distributions of the CBL genes were examined in Gossypium. In general, the CBLs were unevenly distributed among the Gossypium chromosomes. Thirteen GaCBLs were distributed on seven chromosomes. Among them, three GaCBLs were located on each of Gachr07 and Gachr11 chromosomes. Two GaCBLs were situated in each of Gachr06 and Gachr13, and 1 GaCBL was on Gachr01, Gachr08 and Gachr09, respectively (Fig. 1). Thirteen GrCBL genes were identified on nine chromosomes. Each of the four chromosomes Grchr06, Grchr07, Grchr08 and Grchr09 owned 2 genes, and other chromosomes (Grchr02, Grchr03, Grchr04, Grchr10, Grchr13) individually contained one gene (Fig. 1). Likewise, 22 GhCBL family members were mapped onto 17 chromosomes. Each of the five chromosomes Ghchr09, Ghchr11, Ghchr19, Ghchr21 and Ghchr23 had two CBL members, and other chromosomes individually carried one CBL member (Fig. 1). We observed the phenomena of 2 CBL genes joining together in a chromosome. For instance, GaCBL4-2 and GaCBL9 were mapped within 16.0 Mb in Gachr06, and GrCBL4-3 and GrCBL9 were mapped within 53.8 Mb in Grchr08. These findings suggest that tandem duplication plays a role in generating these genes during evolution.

Phylogenetic analysis and structural properties of CBL genes in Gossypium

To determine the sequence similarity relationship of the CBLs among G. arboreum, G. raimondii, and G. hirsutum, the phylogenetic tree for the 48 CBLs was constructed. The CBLs can be classified into four families (I to IV) (Fig. 2A). Family I consisted of 12 CBLs (three GaCBLs, three GrCBLs and six GhCBLs). The members in family II were 8 CBLs (two GaCBLs, two GrCBLs and four GhCBLs). Family III contained 14 CBLs (four GaCBLs, four GrCBLs and six GhCBLs). Family IV had 14 CBLs (four GaCBLs, four GrCBLs and six GhCBLs) (Fig. 2A).

Distributions of the CBL family genes on chromosomes in Gossypium.

Figure 1: Distributions of the CBL family genes on chromosomes in Gossypium.

The GaCBLs, GrCBLs and GhCBLs are from G. arboreum, G. raimondii and G. hirsutum, respectively.
Analysis of phylogenetic relationship, gene architecture and conserved domains of CBLs in Gossypium.

Figure 2: Analysis of phylogenetic relationship, gene architecture and conserved domains of CBLs in Gossypium.

(A) The phylogenetic tree, exon-intron architecture and EF-hand domains of CBLs in G. arboreum, G. raimondii and G. hirsutum. The four major subfamilies are numbered I–IV. The color boxes indicate exons, and the color lines indicate introns; (B) The logo of the myristoylation motif. The capital letters stand for the amino acids, the higher the letter, the higher the conservation; (C) Multiple sequences containing the myristoylation motif in Gossypium CBLs.

The structure of a protein is closely related to its functions in cells. We therefore identified the intron-exon structures of the CBL genes in Gossypium by mapping the cDNA sequences onto their genomic sequences. Most of GaCBLs and GrCBLs owned eight exons except that GaCBL3-2, GrCBL10-1, GrCBL10-2 had nine and GaCBL9, GrCBL1-2 had seven. The majority of GhCBLs carried 7–11 exons, but GhCBL4-4 had three exons and GhCBL3-6 had 22 exons (Fig. 2A).

The putative domains in the Gossypium CBL proteins were also investigated. EF-hand motifs, which bind to Ca2+ ions to transfer calcium signals, were observed in all CBL members. Each CBL proteins had three EF-hand motifs except for GaCBL9, which contained two such motifs (Fig. 2A). Furthermore, a conserved myristoylation motif (MGCXXS/T) was detected in the N-terminal regions of 11 CBL proteins. These proteins included four GaCBLs, two GrCBLs and five GhCBLs (Fig. 2B, 2C). A conserved palmitoylation site with N-terminal Cys residue at third, fourth, fifth or sixth position in amino acid sequence also existed in many cotton CBL members. The two sites are important in the attachment of a protein to membrane (Mohanta et al., 2015).

Synteny analysis of CBL genes in Gossypium

To investigate the genetic origins and evolution of the CBLs in Gossypium, the homologous gene pairs among the CBLs from G. arboretum, G. raimondii and G. hirsutum were monitored, and the collinear analysis was carried out. The results revealed that 10 homologous gene pairs existed between G. arboreum and G. hirsutum, and 11 homologous gene pairs were found between G. raimondii and G. Hirsutum (Fig. 3A). Using the same method, seven homologous gene pairs were observed between G. arboreum and G. raimondii. They were distributed on five chromosomes in G. arboreum and five chromosomes in G. raimondii, respectively (Fig. 3B). Moreover, 212 homologous gene pairs (both based on orthology and paralogy) were found among the CBLs from the three Gossypium species (Table S1). These results imply that many cotton CBL genes may have evolved through segmental duplication.

Genome-wide synteny analysis of Gossypium CBL genes.

Figure 3: Genome-wide synteny analysis of Gossypium CBL genes.

(A) Synteny analysis between G. hirsutum and two diploid species G. arboreum and G. raimondii. Blue lines link gene pairs between G. arboreum and G. hirsutum, and red lines link gene pairs between G. raimondii and G. hirsutum; (B) Synteny analysis between G. arboreum and G. raimondi.

Analysis of Ka/Ks values of the CBLs

To better understand the divergence of the Gossypium CBL genes after polyploidization, the value Ka and Ks and their ratio (Ka/Ks) were evaluated for the homologous gene pairs among G. arboreum, G. raimondii and G. hirsutum (Fig. 4, Table S2). The results showed that the Ka/Ks values among most of the homologous genes were less than 1, indicating they evolved under the purifying selection effect. Only GhCBL10-2/GrCBL10-1 has a Ka/Ks ratio more than 1, hinting that the gene pair may have been generated via the directional selection.

The Ka/Ks values of the CBL homologous genes between the A genome, D genome and subgenomes of G. hirsutum (AtDt).

Figure 4: The Ka/Ks values of the CBL homologous genes between the A genome, D genome and subgenomes of G. hirsutum (AtDt).

Phylogenetic relationship of CBLs in Gossypium and other plant species

To gain insight into the evolutionary relationships among GaCBLs, GrCBLs, GhCBLs and CBLs of other plant species, we constructed a phylogenetic tree. Full-length amino acid sequences of 126 predicted CBL proteins were obtained from G. arboretum, G. raimondii, G. hirsutum, A. thaliana, C. papaya, G. max, V. vinifera, T. cacao, P. trichocarpa, R. communis and O. sativa. Phylogenetic trees were generated using the neighbor-joining method and MEGA 5.0 software. The CBLs family was divided into thirteen subfamilies according to the topology of the phylogenetic tree (Fig. 5). As expected, the three Gossypium CBLs commonly clustered closely in a subfamily. Most of them belonged to subfamily two, eight and thirteen. We found that the CBL members from different dicotyledon species and rice always clustered in a subfamily, suggesting that the CBLs shared an ancestral sequence before the divergence of eudicots and monocots or convergent evolution events for these CBLs might have occurred in adaptations to drastic changes in the environment. Moreover, the CBLs from Gossypium plants often clustered together with those from T. cacao (Fig. 5). These results are expected because both Gossypium and T. cacao are in the Malvaceae family.

Phylogenetic tree of CBLs in Gossypium and other plant species.

Figure 5: Phylogenetic tree of CBLs in Gossypium and other plant species.

The plants in the square frame indicate that the CBL genes outside of Gossypium have the closest evolutionary relationship with Gossypium CBLs.

Annotation analysis of GhCBLs

Putative functions of GhCBLs were analyzed using KOG (EuKaryotic orthologous groups (KOG) database (ftp://ftp.ncbi.nih.gov/pub/COG/KOG). Only the information on GhCBL3-6 was obtained. It was predicted that GhCBL3-6 played roles in modulation of RNA processing and modification, signal transduction, and coenzyme transport and metabolism. Gene ontology (GO) database for the 22 GhCBLs was also assessed. The result showed that these GhCBL members were capable of binding calcium ion, like those of other plant species. These analyses indicate that GhCBLs and other CBLs are of great importance in Ca2+ signal transduction in plants.

Expression analysis of GhCBL genes in tissues

The expression patterns of all the 22 GhCBL genes in tissues were monitored by qRT-PCR. We found that most genes were highly expressed in flowers except that GhCBL4-3, GhCBL4-4, and GhCBL8 were dominantly expressed in roots and GhCBL3-6 strongly expressed in leaves. Moreover, the transcripts of GhCBL1-1, GhCBL1-4, GhCBL1-5, GhCBL3-4, GhCBL3-5, GhCBL3-6 and GhCBL9 were relatively abundant in fiber, and those of GhCBL4-3 were also numerous in flowers (Fig. 6). These results suggest that GhCBL4-3, GhCBL4-4 and GhCBL8 may mainly function in roots, GhCBL3-6 mainly functions in leaves and other genes may chiefly act in flowers. GhCBL1-1, GhCBL1-4, GhCBL1-5, GhCBL3-4, GhCBL3-5, GhCBL3-6 and GhCBL9 also probably play a part in fiber development in cotton.

Expression of 22 GhCBL genes in tissues of cotton.

Figure 6: Expression of 22 GhCBL genes in tissues of cotton.

The genes preferentially expressed in flowers (A), roots (B) and leaves (C) are shown. The relative expression of genes was calculated from 3 independent replicates. The expression value of the gene in roots was set as 1. The vertical bars represent the standard error.

Expression patterns of GhCBLs in responding to potassium deficiency

CBLs have been addressed to play key roles in response to K+ deprivation in Arabidopsis and rice (Li et al., 2014a; Mao et al., 2016). Accordingly, we measured the expression patterns of the 22 GhCBL genes in response to potassium deficiency. As a whole, potassium deficiency moderately altered the expression levels of GhCBL genes (Fig. 7). Under potassium deficiency, the transcripts of many genes were reduced at 6 h, but increased at 2 d and/or 5 d. These gene included GhCBL3-1, GhCBL3-2, GhCBL3-3, GhCBL3-4, GhCBL4-4, and GhCBL10-3. The expression levels of GhCBL3-5, GhCBL3-6, GhCBL4-3, GhCBL4-5, GhCBL8 and GhCBL9 were decreased while those of other genes were unchanged after shortage of potassium (Fig. 7). The effects of K+ resupply on the abundances of GhCBL transcripts were also investigated. Compared with 5 d of low-K+ treatments, 3 h of K+ refeeding clearly resulted in decreases in the expression of many genes such as GhCBL1-3, GhCBL1-5, GhCBL3-2, GhCBL3-3, GhCBL3-4, GhCBL10-1 and GhCBL10-3. However, K+ resupply increased the expression of GhCBL4-1. The transcriptional levels of other genes did not significantly alter upon K+ resupply (Fig. 7). These results suggest that a number of GhCBLs may play roles in response to potassium starvation in cotton.

Expression of 22 GhCBL genes under potassium deprivation.

Figure 7: Expression of 22 GhCBL genes under potassium deprivation.

The relative expression of GhCBLs was examined under potassium deficiency or resupply for indicated period of time. Under K deficiency, the expression levels of the genes were decreased at 6 h but increased at 2 d and/or 5 d (A), were reduced (B), and were not altered (C) significantly. The expression value of the gene at 0 h was set as 1. The vertical bars mean the standard error. Statistical analyses were conducted by student’s t test to assess the differences between the samples at 0 h and those at 6 h, 2 d, or 5 d as well as between the samples at 5 d and those upon resupplying potassium for 3 h (5 d + 3 h). The single and double asterisks means that the differences are significant (P ≤ 0.05) and extremely significant (P ≤ 0.01), respectively.

Several GhCBLs can interact with GhCIPK23 in vitro

To examine whether GhCBLs interact with GhCIPK23, yeast two-hybrid experiments were performed and total of 12 GhCBLs were measured. Among them, GhCBL1-2, GhCBL1-3, GhCBL4-4, GhCBL8, GhCBL9 and GhCBL10-3 were observed to interact with GhCIPK23. Furthermore, GhCBL1-2 and GhCBL9, the respective homologues of Arabidopsis CBL1 and CBL9, displayed more strong interactive signals with GhCIPK23 in yeast, suggesting that GhCBL1-2 and GhCBL9 may directly regulate GhCIPK23 in cotton.

Discussion

In the present study, we identified 13, 13 and 22 CBL genes in G. arboreum, G. raimondii and G. hirsutum genomes, respectively (Table 3). Among the 22 GhCBL genes, 11 and 11 were assigned to the At and Dt subgenome, respectively. They were similar to the number of CBL s found in G. arboreum and G. raimondii, respectively. We detected that eight GaCBLs and nine GrCBLs were homologous genes of GhCBLs. However, homologues of five GaCBLs and four GrCBLs were not discovered in the genome of G. hirsutum. These findings indicate that the eight GaCBLs and nine GrCBLs have been maintained in G. hirsutum after polyploidization event, while the five GaCBLs and four GrCBLs diverged from their orthologs in G. hirsutum during evolution. Moreover, we observed five GhCBLs (GhCBL1-3, GhCBL3-5, GhCBL4-1, GhCBL4-4, GhCBL10-1) in At subgenome and two GhCBLs (GhCBL3-4, GhCBL3-6) in Dt had no homologues in A genome of G. arboreum and D genome of G. raimondii, respectively. It is conceivable because selection pressures in diploids per loci are different than in the allotetraploid. Relaxed selection allows for development of novel and new functional alleles, but may also accumulate non functional, both at a higher rate possible that within the diploids. G. arboreum originates in the Africa/Arabia while G. raimondii and G. hirsutum originate in the Americas (Wendel, Brubaker & Seelanan, 2010). They are distributed in quite different places during evolution. Moreover, G. arboreum and G. hirsutum are two domasticated species (Wendel, Brubaker & Seelanan, 2010). Hence, geographic separation of the three species, and human selection may be essential for the diversity of the CBLs in Gossypium.

The physical properties of most GaCBLs and GrCBLs were similar to those of GhCBLs (Table 3), suggesting that the functions of the CBLs from the three cotton species remain highly conserved during evolution. The majority of Gossypium CBLs was predicted to localize in the membrane, just like many CBLs in Arabidopsis and rice. In Arabidopsis, CBL1 and CBL9 were described to localize in the PM. CBL2, CBL3 and CBL6 localize in tonoplast whereas CBL10 is in both PM and tonoplast (Mao et al., 2016). Rice CBL1 is also present in PM. The localizations of the CBLs should be consistent with their primary roles of sensing and transferring Ca2+ signals in Gossypium. However, GhCBL3-6 was predicted to be nuclear. Its roles are unknown at present. Experimental characterization of GhCBL3-6 might shed light on some novel functions of it. GhCBL3-6 also gives obvious proof of the evolutionary advantage of being tetraploid. It may be a product of significant human intervention because nothing like it was seen in either diploid.

Analysis of gene distributions on chromosomes showed that most homologues of GaCBLs and GrCBLs in G. hirsutum were present in their corresponding At and Dt homologous chromosomes, respectively. These findings indicate that GhCBLs originate from DNA polyploidization. However, some GhCBLs homologues of GaCBLs and GrCBLs did not appear on their corresponding At or Dt chromosomes, suggesting that complex exchange events of chromosome segments occurred in G. hirsutum during evolution. Additionally, separated (e.g., GaCBL4-1 and GaCBL4-2; GrCBL1-1 and GrCBL1-2) and jointed (GaCBL4-2 and GaCBL9) distributions of the Gossypium CBL homologous genes in chromosomes in combination with the colinearity results of these genes (Figs 1; 3) imply that both segmental duplication and tandem duplication are essential for the generation of cotton CBLs during genetic evolution.The number of introns in coding region of most CBL genes in Gossypium was six or seven, very similar to that in CBLs genes in Arabidopsis, rice, maize, wheat, canola and eggplant (Kolukisaoglu et al., 2004; Zhang et al., 2014; Sun et al., 2015; Li et al., 2016a; Li et al., 2016b; Zhang et al., 2016), reflecting the rather conserved structure of CBL genes in different species. Moreover, nearly all of the Gossypium CBLs shared three conserved EF hand domains with other higher plants (Fig. 2). In addition, many CBLs from Gossypium contained the myristoylated and palmitoylated sites, which may facilitate the targeting of CBL-CIPK complex to membrane. These features are also similar to those in Arabidopsis, rice and other plants (Kolukisaoglu et al., 2004; Mohanta et al., 2015). The conserved structure of these CBL family members in different plants might reflect a very similar mode of action and/or conserved interaction with their target protein CIPKs (Mohanta et al., 2015).

Measurement of the ratio of Ka to Ks indicated that majority of Gossypium CBL homologous genes have undergone purifying selection whereas GhCBL10-2/GrCBL10-1 has experienced directional selection after polyploidization (Fig. 4). These results suggest that most GhCBLs have very high similarity in gene sequences and highly conserved functions to their orthologs from G. arboretum and G. raimondii during evolution. By contrast, a large divergence between GhCBL10-2 and GrCBL10-1G has happened. GhCBL10-2 may have evolved some novel functions through natural selection and human selection.

Phylogenetic analysis results revealed that the CBLs in Gossypium have closer relationship with those in cocoa than in other plants tested (Fig. 5). These findings strongly suggest that the cotton species may have a more recent common ancestor with cacao relative to other plant species, in line with the results of other gene families in Gossypium (Li et al., 2014b; Li et al., 2016a; Li et al., 2016b). It may justify using CBL as another evolutionary model in plants because it showed highest similarity with another taxon from the same family and may help to narrow down the most vital or evolutionarily conserved or ancient sequences in Gossypium.

Yeast two-hybrid analysis of interactions between GhCBLs and GhCIPK23.

Figure 8: Yeast two-hybrid analysis of interactions between GhCBLs and GhCIPK23.

The yeast cells containing the indicated plasmids were grown on the non-selective SD/-Leu/-Trp solid medium and selective SD/-Leu/-Trp/-His/-Ade solid medium, followed by X- α-Gal staining. The reduced cell densities in the dilution series are shown by narrowing triangles when proceeding from left to right. The first row represents a positive control, the 2th and 3th rows represent two negative controls.

Expression analysis results showed that almost all of the GhCBL genes were expressed in various tissues including the root, stem, leaf, flower and fiber. Of note, most genes were dominantly expressed in the flower and fiber (Fig. 6), hinting that these genes may play important roles in the reproductive development in cotton. G. hirsutum is a highly domesticated plant for its seed fiber, which is developed from the flower. Preferential expression of many GhCBLs in flowers and fibers suggests that human selection markedly affects the genetic variation and expression profiles of GhCBLs. Besides, the expression levels of GhCBL4-3 GhCBL4-4 and GhCBL8 in roots were clearly higher than those of other genes. These data imply that the three genes may function in modulation of ion transport or acclimation to diverse abiotic stresses in roots. Their detailed actions and mechanisms will be examined in the future.

The expression of 22 GhCBLs in responding to potassium starvation was determined. The transcription of most genes was moderately promoted at 2 d and/or 5 d post low-potassium treatments (Fig. 7), indicating multiple GhCBL genes likely regulate cotton response to potassium deprivation. Strikingly, in Arabidopsis, the expression of CBL1 and CBL9 was reported to be stable, and the transcripts of CBL10 in roots were moderately decreased under low-potassium conditions (Cheong et al., 2007; Ren et al., 2013). These results imply that constitutive expression of some CBL genes may be enough for transmitting Ca2+ signals to downstream targets in response to potassium deficiency in plants. Thus, those GhCBLs that were not induced by low-potassium stress also likely play a part in adaptations to potassium deprivation in cotton. However, which sequences and how GhCBLs regulate potassium starved responses remains to be investigated in the future.

CIPK23 has been observed to function in diverse cellular processes in Arabidopsis (Mao et al., 2016). In this study, six out of 12 GhCBLs could interact with GhCIPK23 in yeast (Fig. 8), indicating that different GhCBL members may interact with and modulate GhCIPK23 in various growth and/or stress responses in cotton. The cotton homologues of Arabidopsis CBL1 and CBL9 suggest that GhCBL1 and GhCBL9 probably play similar roles to CBL1 and CBL9 in cotton.

Supplemental Information

All the homologous gene pairs and their location on chromosomes

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.3653/supp-1

The Ka and Ks values of orthology homologous gene pairs

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.3653/supp-2