The earth is flat (p > 0.05): significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research

Whoever wants to deemphasize "trends" should deemphasize "significance" in general and present p-values as continuous indices of compatibility between the data and the model. See https://t.co/PnRCHpMwzE and https://t.co/20zlyHGYQe. https://t.co/0uo2tXHzDR
RT @vamrhein: 100 years of criticism of statistical significance – and where are we today? Boring (1919) in his paper 'Mathematical vs. sc…
RT @vamrhein: 100 years of criticism of statistical significance – and where are we today? Boring (1919) in his paper 'Mathematical vs. sc…
2565 days ago
RT @ThomasRowland90: I found this a very useful & accessible discussion on p values and inference https://t.co/pPcwzTyZmQ
I found this a very useful & accessible discussion on p values and inference https://t.co/pPcwzTyZmQ
RT @vamrhein: 100 years of criticism of statistical significance – and where are we today? Boring (1919) in his paper 'Mathematical vs. sc…
RT @vamrhein: 100 years of criticism of statistical significance – and where are we today? Boring (1919) in his paper 'Mathematical vs. sc…
Publication bias: If observations of white swans remain unpublished, reports of black swans cannot be used to infer on general swan color. https://t.co/iq8K9SE7Gr
RT @vamrhein: 100 years of criticism of statistical significance – and where are we today? Boring (1919) in his paper 'Mathematical vs. sc…
RT @vamrhein: Since p-values from exploratory research should be taken as descriptive with little inferential content, such studies are per…
RT @vamrhein: 100 years of criticism of statistical significance – and where are we today? Boring (1919) in his paper 'Mathematical vs. sc…
RT @vamrhein: 100 years of criticism of statistical significance – and where are we today? Boring (1919) in his paper 'Mathematical vs. sc…
RT @vamrhein: 100 years of criticism of statistical significance – and where are we today? Boring (1919) in his paper 'Mathematical vs. sc…
RT @vamrhein: 100 years of criticism of statistical significance – and where are we today? Boring (1919) in his paper 'Mathematical vs. sc…
100 years of criticism of statistical significance – and where are we today? Boring (1919) in his paper 'Mathematical vs. scientific significance': "Conclusions must ultimately be left to the scientific intuition of the experimenter and his public." https://t.co/GtBcMtiVdt
2567 days ago
RT @atlanticailabs: The earth is flat (p>0.05) https://t.co/3Olio08Rz4 via @thePeerJ
2568 days ago
RT @vamrhein: Since p-values from exploratory research should be taken as descriptive with little inferential content, such studies are per…
2568 days ago
RT @vamrhein: Since p-values from exploratory research should be taken as descriptive with little inferential content, such studies are per…
RT @vamrhein: Since p-values from exploratory research should be taken as descriptive with little inferential content, such studies are per…
2568 days ago
RT @vamrhein: Since p-values from exploratory research should be taken as descriptive with little inferential content, such studies are per…
2568 days ago
RT @vamrhein: The null hypothesis cannot be 'confirmed' nor 'strengthened' using a p-value, because very likely there are many better hypot…
RT @vamrhein: The null hypothesis cannot be 'confirmed' nor 'strengthened' using a p-value, because very likely there are many better hypot…
RT @vamrhein: Since p-values from exploratory research should be taken as descriptive with little inferential content, such studies are per…
RT @vamrhein: Since p-values from exploratory research should be taken as descriptive with little inferential content, such studies are per…
RT @vamrhein: Since p-values from exploratory research should be taken as descriptive with little inferential content, such studies are per…