The earth is flat (p > 0.05): significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research

View article
@OldTiredGrumpy @pathogenomenick We suggest "dichotomous threshold thinking must give way to non-automated informed judgment" https://t.co/Q167s9yTBH
reply repost on X like
@smotus @KevinKBanda I'm gonna use p<.99. https://t.co/Q167s9yTBH
reply repost on X like
@dalejbarr "Dichotomous threshold thinking is still the rule among applied researchers" https://t.co/Q167s9yTBH
reply repost on X like
@phylogenomics Should we have a threshold at all? https://t.co/Q167s9yTBH
reply repost on X like
RT @vamrhein: @Neuro_Skeptic Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research https://t.co/y6ZeHs4xSm
reply repost on X like
@davidlederer @iwashyna @IPFdoc @lungDrE @KaminskiMed @AnnalsATS Significance thresholds reduce replicability https://t.co/Q167s9yTBH
reply repost on X like
@chrishanretty @dsquareddigest Let's respectfully discharge significance and interpret p-values as continuous measures of evidence https://t.co/Q167s9yTBH
reply repost on X like
@chrishanretty P=0.005 would probably reinforce our main problems: p-hacking, publication bias, winner's curse. https://t.co/Q167s9yTBH
reply repost on X like
3087 days ago
RT @vamrhein: @Neuro_Skeptic Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research https://t.co/y6ZeHs4xSm
reply repost on X like
@FireRoute19 @SJC_fishy Yep. Here's another recent one: https://t.co/pepkxyuiLe Unfortunately, few of us seem to be doing anything about it...
reply repost on X like
RT @vamrhein: @Neuro_Skeptic Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research https://t.co/y6ZeHs4xSm
reply repost on X like
@DataSciFact Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research https://t.co/y6ZeHs4xSm
reply repost on X like
@aramataTM Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research https://t.co/y6ZeHs4xSm
reply repost on X like
@Neuro_Skeptic Significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research https://t.co/y6ZeHs4xSm
reply repost on X like
[OA] The earth is flat (p > 0.05): significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research. The... https://t.co/KlKjAKQnau
reply repost on X like
3089 days ago
The earth is flat (p> 0.05): significance thresholds & the crisis of unreplicable research https://t.co/qnPhm9tJWL Amrhein et al v @thePeerJ https://t.co/KYU9EPnzh3
reply repost on X like
@CMichaelGibson The earth is flat (p > 0.05): significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research https://t.co/y6ZeHs4xSm
reply repost on X like
@kocherlakota009 @mileskimball Let's "move toward a greater acceptance of uncertainty and embracing of variation" (Gelman 2016) https://t.co/y6ZeHs4xSm
reply repost on X like
@ricardoaraujo "P-values should be interpreted as graded measures of the strength of evidence against the null hypothesis" https://t.co/y6ZeHs4xSm
reply repost on X like
RT @walkingrandomly: The earth is flat (p > 0.05): significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research https://t.co/HPHMAE9f7i
reply repost on X like
3089 days ago
RT @walkingrandomly: The earth is flat (p > 0.05): significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research https://t.co/HPHMAE9f7i
reply repost on X like
3089 days ago
RT @walkingrandomly: The earth is flat (p > 0.05): significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research https://t.co/HPHMAE9f7i
reply repost on X like
RT @walkingrandomly: The earth is flat (p > 0.05): significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research https://t.co/HPHMAE9f7i
reply repost on X like
The earth is flat (p > 0.05): significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research https://t.co/HPHMAE9f7i
reply repost on X like
@mpceo @ivanoransky @p_phronesis The earth is flat (p > 0.05): significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research https://t.co/y6ZeHs4xSm
reply repost on X like