γ-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) is a non-protein amino acid present in animals, plants, and other organisms (Batushansky et al., 2014; Gilliham & Tyerman, 2016; Michaeli & Fromm, 2015; Shelp et al., 2012a; Shelp et al., 2012b). It functions as a major inhibitory neurotransmitter in the brain tissues of mammals (Granger et al., 2016; Robel & Sontheimer, 2016). In plants, GABA plays roles in diverse processes including the carbon:nitrogen balance, signaling, regulation of redox status, development, stress responses (Batushansky et al., 2014; Batushansky et al., 2015; Michaeli & Fromm, 2015; Molina-Rueda et al., 2015; Shi et al., 2010; Yu et al., 2014). Recent studies have indicated that GABA is required for proper growth during exposure to abiotic stresses such as salt (Renault et al., 2013), drought (Mekonnen, Flügge & Ludewig, 2016), low temperature (Aghdam et al., 2016), Zn2+ (Daş et al., 2016), and cadmium (Sun et al., 2010). Additionally, exogenous GABA has been shown to regulate the expression of genes such as BnNrt2 in Brassica napus (Beuve et al., 2004), 14-3-3 in Arabidopsis thaliana (Lancien & Roberts, 2006), SAMDC (S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase) in Cucumis melo (Wang et al., 2014), and to control gene transcription in Caragana intermedia (Shi et al., 2010) and A. thaliana (Batushansky et al., 2014). The metabolite GABA has been shown to play roles in a diverse range of cellular processes ranging from neuronal inhibition in animals to pollen-tube development in plants (Michaeli & Fromm, 2015). Consequently, many researchers have focused on the production of GABA, and in particular, the role of glutamate decarboxylase (GAD), which is the unique pyridoxal enzyme catalyzing the α-decarboxylation of L-glutamate to form GABA (Bouché & Fromm, 2004; Shelp et al., 2012a; Shelp et al., 2012b).
The pathway of glutamate decarboxylation catalyzed by GAD is widely distributed in organisms (Liu et al., 2014), and is considered to be the main pathway of GABA production in plants (Shelp et al., 2012a). Genes encoding GAD enzymes have been successfully identified in many herbaceous plants such as rice (Akama et al., 2001), Arabidopsis (Bouché et al., 2004), maize (Zhuang et al., 2010), and Panax ginseng (Lee et al., 2010) and in some woody plants, such as pine (Molina-Rueda et al., 2010), apple (Trobacher et al., 2013), citrus (Liu et al., 2014), and tea (Mei et al., 2016). Bioinformatics analyses and experimental characterizations have shown that plant GADs contain a calmodulin (CaM)-binding domain that is generally responsible for the cytosolic decarboxylation of glutamate to GABA (Shelp et al., 2012a), although one functional OsGAD2 without a Ca2+/calmodulin domain has been isolated from rice (Akama et al., 2001). Several studies have demonstrated spatiotemporal differences in the expressions of GAD gene family member, although most GAD families studied to date have fewer than nine members (Shelp et al., 2012a). For example, AtGAD1 is mainly expressed in Arabidopsis roots (Miyashita & Good, 2008), while ZmGAD1 is expressed in the leaves, stems, and roots of maize (Zhuang et al., 2010). In rice, OsGAD1 is mainly expressed in seeds but OsGAD2 is mainly expressed in roots (Akama et al., 2001). In citrus, CsGAD1 is predominantly expressed in flowers but CsGAD2 is predominantly expressed in fruit (Liu et al., 2014). Interestingly PpGAD expression was shown to be correlated with vascular differentiation in pine seedlings (Molina-Rueda et al., 2010). Additionally, environmental stimuli were shown to induce the expression of ZmGAD1 in maize (Zhuang et al., 2010) and PgGAD in P. ginseng (Lee et al., 2010). These studies indicate that plant GADs might play important roles in plant development and stress responses. However, few studies have focused on the expression of GADs in woody plants under environmental stresses.
Our previous studies showed that salt stress induced significant expression of EST sequences (Supplemental Information 1) homologous to plant GAD genes in the desert legume shrub, C. intermedia. We also showed that exogenous GABA can enhance the expression of genes, including those related to hormones and reactive oxygen species (ROS), which involved the stress responses of this shrub (Shi et al., 2010). Therefore, in the present study, we cloned two full-length cDNAs, CiGAD1 and CiGAD2, from C. intermedia based on known EST sequences using the rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) technique. We analyzed changes in their transcript levels in response to different stress factors and exogenous abscisic acid (ABA). These results allowed us to explore the relationship between GAD expression and GABA accumulation, which will increase our understanding of the roles of GABA in stress adaptation in plants.
Materials and Methods
Plant materials and treatments
Seeds of C. intermedia were collected from a desert habitat in Inner Mongolia, China. Seedlings were cultivated as described by Shi et al. (2010). Briefly, seeds were washed and then germinated in sand. Three-day-old seedlings (radical length, 30–40 mm) were selected and cultivated with water in pots in a growth chamber under a 14-h light/10-h dark photoperiod and a day/night temperature of 23/18 °C. The seedlings were grown for 2–3 weeks, and the water was refreshed every 2 days. Subsequently, the seedlings were subjected to the following stress treatments: (1) NaCl (200 mM), ZnSO4 (100 µM), CdCl2 (500 µM), high temperature (40 °C), low temperature (4 °C), or dehydration (for 3 h); (2) NaCl (200 mM) for different durations (0, 3, 6, 12, and 24 h); and (3) exogenous ABA (0, 0.5, 1, 10, 100, and 200 µM) combined with the 200 mM NaCl treatment for 0, 3, and 24 h. Roots and leaves were harvested, frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen, and then stored at −80 °C. Also, different tissues including roots, stems, leaves, seeds, testae, and bark were collected from mature individuals growing at the Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing, frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen, and then stored at −80 °C. Every experimental treatment had three biological replicates.
Cloning, sequencing, and bioinformatic analysis
Total RNA was extracted from pooled roots and leaves with Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), and complementary DNA (cDNA) was generated with the SMARTer™ RACE cDNA amplification kit (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Then, 5′ and 3′ RACE were performed using nested gene-specific primers (Table S1). The obtained amplification products were cloned into the pMD19-D vector (Takara, Dalian, China) and sequenced. Then, the two full-length sequences were assembled by DNAMAN 6.0. CiGAD1 and CiGAD2 have been deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers KU586714 and KU586715, respectively.
The two full-length cDNA sequences of CiGAD1 and CiGAD2 were analyzed with ORF Finder (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/orffinder/), and the isoelectric point (pI) and molecular weight (MW) of the predicted protein were estimated using ExPASy (http://web.expasy.org/compute_pi/). Sequences for the protein homology analysis were obtained from phytozome (https://phytozome.jgi.doe.gov/pz/portal.html), and aligned using DNAMAN 8.0. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using MEGA 6.06 software by the maximum-likelihood algorithm with 1,000 bootstrap replicates.
Southern blot analysis
Genomic DNA was isolated from leaves of C. intermedia using CTAB method (Porebski, Bailey & Baum, 1997), and 20 µg DNAs were digested with BamH I and EcoR V, respectively. The obtaining fragments were separated by electrophoresis through a 1.0% agarose, then the DIG-labeled DNA probes of CiGAD1 and CiGAD2 were hybridized followed the protocol of DIG-High Prime DNA Labeling and Detection Starter Kit I (Roche Applied Science, Mannheim, Germany). Briefly, the DIG-labeled DNA probe was prehybridized at 60 °C for 2 h and then hybridized 37 °C for 12 h. Following hybridization, the blot was washed twice in 2 × SSC containing 0.1% SDS at 25 °C for 5 min and was washed twice in 0.1 × SSC containing 0.1% SDS at 50 °C for 15 min. The immunodetection of the DIG-labeled probe was performed with 1:10,000 anti DIG-AP. The blot was exposed to X-ray film (AGFA, Germany). DNA probes were amplified from genomic DNA by using the primers designed in the sequenced DNA fragments based on the cDNA sequences of CiGAD1 and CiGAD2, while the probe for CiGAD1 was mainly in the region from 1,076–1,370 bp in the full-text cDNA, and the probe for CiGAD2 was mainly in the region from 639–1,031 bp in the full-text cDNA. Primers are listed in Table S1 and probe sequences are listed in Supplemental Information 3.
Assay of GAD activity
About 0.1 g sample (root, stem, leaf, seed, or bark) was ground into a powder in liquid nitrogen and transferred to a 2-mL centrifuge tube. Then, 1 mL pre-cooled extraction buffer (150 mM potassium phosphate, 5 mM EDTA, 1 mM magnesium chloride, 0.5% (w/v) polyvinylpyrrolidone, 3 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 0.2 mM PLP (pyridoxal 5′-phosphate), 10% (v/v) glycerol, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, pH 5.8) was added, and the homogenate was mixed well. After 15 min incubation on ice, the homogenate was centrifuged at 10,000 g for 15 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was collected into a 2-mL volumetric flask and the volume was adjusted to 1 mL. This was used as the crude enzyme solution (CES; Liu et al., 2014).
To measure GAD activity, the assay mixture (1 mL) contained 0.4 mL 0.1% sodium glutamate, 0.2 mL 0.25 mM PLP, and 0.4 mL CES. After mixing well, the reaction mixture was incubated at 40 °C for 5 h and then boiled for 5 min to end the reaction. Sodium glutamate was replaced by 0.4 mL distilled water in the blank control. After cooling, the absorbance of the mixture was measured at 640 nm using a Multi-Mode Detection Platform (SpectraMax Paradigm; Molecular Devices Co., Sunnyvale, CA, USA). A GABA standard curve was constructed and used to calculate the GABA content in the samples based on absorption value, as described by Yang, Hui & Gu (2016). And protein contents were tested by Bradford method (Kruger, 1994) with bovine serum albumin as standard. One unit (U) was defined as the amount (µmol) of GABA produced by the action of one mg protein per hour. All determinations were representative of three biological experiments and four technical replicates.
Determination of GABA
The plant tissues were ground to a fine powder in liquid nitrogen, and about 0.1 g of the frozen homogenate was extracted using methanol and lanthanum chloride, and then centrifuged at 13,000g for 5 min, and 0.8 ml of the supernatant was transferred to a new Eppendorf tube. The 160 µl of 1 M KOH was added, and centrifugation as before. The 100 µl resulting supernatant was used in the spectrophotometric GABA determination (Zhang & Bown, 1997). The assay mixture (300 µl) also contained 75 mM potassium pyrophosphate (pH 8.6), 3.3 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 1.25 mM β-NADP+, 5 mM 2-ketoglutarate and 0.02 units of GABase (Sigma). The increase of OD340 nm was recorded using 96-well microplate reader. The amount of GABA was calculated according to external calibration curve of GABA (Renault et al., 2010). Values shown were representative of three biological experiments and four technical replicates.
Total RNAs were extracted from a pool of roots and leaves with Trizol reagent (Invitrogen), and then cDNAs were synthesized with 0.5 µg RNAs using the Prime Script™ RT reagent kit (Perfect Real Time; Takara, Dalian, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Specific RT-PCR primers (Table S2) were designed to have melting temperatures of 60 °C and amplicon lengths of 150–200 bp using Primer3 software (http://primer3.ut.ee/). Real-time qRT-PCR was performed in quadruplicate using the SYBR Premix Ex Taq™ II kit (Takara) on a Roche lightCycler 480 (Roche Applied Sciences, Penzberg, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The 2−ΔCt method was adopted to analyze the qRT-PCR result, and ΔCt = Cttarget-Ct EF1α. Values shown were representative of three biological experiments.
Data were evaluated by Duncan’s multiple test in SPSS v.19. Differences were considered significant at P < 0.05.
Isolation of CiGADs and bioinformatics analyses
Two full-length cDNAs of glutamate decarboxylase (GAD) genes were isolated from C. intermedia by 5′- and 3′-RACE, as shown in Fig. S1, and designated as CiGAD1 (GenBank ID: KU586714) and CiGAD2 (GenBank ID: KU586715). Bioinformatics analyses showed that CiGAD1 had a 1922-bp full-length mRNA sequence containing a 1521-bp open reading frame (ORF), a 107-bp 5′ puntranslated region (UTR), and a 294-bp 3′-UTR; and that CiGAD2 had a 1797-bp full-length mRNA sequence containing a 1797-bp ORF, a 60-bp 5′-UTR, and a 237-bp 3′-UTR. The alignment showed that the nucleotide identity between CiGAD1 and CiGAD2 was 69.0%. Theoretically, CiGAD1 encodes a 57.3-kDa peptide consisting of 506 amino acids with the theoretical isoelectric point (pI) of 5.5, and CiGAD2 encodes a 56.1-kDa peptide consisting of 499 amino acids with the theoretical isoelectric point (pI) of 5.6.
The deduced amino acid sequences of the two CiGADs were aligned with GAD family members from three typical model plants; Arabidopsis, Glycine, and Populus (Fig. S2). The amino acid identity between CiGAD1 and CiGAD2 was 71.4%. CiGAD1 shared 88.5%, 79.9% and 79.4% amino acid identity with Glycine GAD5, Arabidopsis GAD1, and Populus GAD1, respectively. CsGAD2 shared 83.1%, 75.0%, and 72.1% amino acid identity with Glycine GAD2, Populus GAD5, and Arabidopsis GAD5, respectively. Both CiGAD proteins contained two conserved domains: a PLP-binding domain in the middle region and a CaM-binding domain at the carboxyl terminus (Fig. 1). The ML tree showed that CiGAD1 was located close to GmGAD5, GmGAD1, and GmGAD3; while CiGAD2 was in a completely different clade, close to GmGAD2, GmGAD4, PtGAD5, and AtGAD5 (Fig. 2). These findings indicated that CiGAD proteins from C. intermedia, a salt- and drought-resistant desert legume shrub, had higher homologies with GAD homologs in soybean, another well-known legume.
We also performed a southern blot analysis to estimate the copy number of two GAD genes in C. intermedia. The result showed one band in BamH I or EcoR I restriction the digest lane of CiGAD1 (Fig. 3A) and two bands in the BamH I or EcoRI restriction digest lane of CiGAD2 (Fig. 3B), respectively. This confirmed that CiGAD1 had one copy, and CiGAD2-related genes were present as two copies in the genome of C. intermedia.
Tissue-specific expression of two CiGADs
The expression of two CiGADs showed different patterns in various issues including roots, stems, leaves, seeds, testae, and bark from mature individuals (Fig. 4A). The transcript levels of CiGAD1 were lower than those of CiGAD2 in roots, seeds, testae, and bark, but the opposite pattern was observed in other tissues. The two genes showed contrasting trends in mRNA abundance in most tissues. The highest transcript level of CiGAD1 was in testae, followed by leaves and stems, while it was almost undetectable in roots and bark. In contrast, CiGAD2 showed the highest transcript level in the bark (37.9-fold that of CiGAD1 in the bark), followed by testae and roots (1.9 and 21.3 fold higher, respectively, than that of CiGAD1). The GAD activity was highest in testaes (9.9 U), followed by seeds (3.2 U). But its activity was lower, and similar, among the other tested tissues (1.1–1.9 U) (Fig. 4B).
Stress-specific expression of two CiGADs
To investigate whether the two CiGADs were expressed differently in response to various stress conditions, total RNA was extracted from roots and leaves of young seedlings under several different stress treatments. Both CiGADs showed dramatic increases in their transcript levels in roots and leaves in response to stress (Figs. 5A, 5B ). Under Zn stress, the transcript level of CiGAD1 increased by 74.3-fold and that of CiGAD2 increased by 6.3-fold, compared with their respective levels in control roots. CiGAD1 showed 3.4–11.3 fold increases in its transcript levels in roots under dehydration, Cd, Na, and low/high temperature stresses. CiGAD2 transcript levels showed 1.0–5.5 fold increases in roots under all of the stresses except Cd stress (Fig. 5A). In leaves, the transcript levels of CiGAD1 and CiGAD2 strongly increased in response to high temperature by 218.1-fold and 114.2-fold, respectively, compared with their respective levels in the control leaves (Fig. 5B). The transcript levels of CiGAD1 and CiGAD2 increased by 20.6-fold and 36.0-fold, respectively, under NaCl stress, and by 19.7-fold and 21.8-fold, respectively, under low temperature stress. Under Zn, Cd, and dehydration stress, CiGAD1 expression increased by 4.4–8.5 fold, and CiGAD2 expression increased by 1.5–5.2 fold. These results indicated that the transcript levels of CiGAD1 and CiGAD2 increased to varying degrees in response to various stresses.
To analyze the expression of the two CiGADs under stress in more detail, seedlings were treated with NaCl for different times, as shown in Fig. 6. The transcript levels of CiGAD1 and CiGAD2 significantly increased as the duration of the NaCl treatment extended, although there were some fluctuations in their transcript levels in leaves at 12 h and in roots at 6 h (Figs. 6A and 6B). In roots, the transcript levels of CiGAD1 and CiGAD2 had increased by 20.8-fold and 16.4-fold, respectively, after 6 h of salt stress, and by 41.2-fold and 12.0-fold, respectively, after 24 h of salt stress, compared with their respective levels at 0 h (Fig. 6A). However, in the leaves, CiGAD1 and CiGAD2 transcript levels remained relatively stable except at 6 h of salt stress, when they were increased by 20.6–23.7 fold, and 11.5–13.8 fold, respectively, compared with their respective levels at 0 h (Fig. 6B). Further analyses showed that CiGAD1 was more strongly induced than was CiGAD2 as the NaCl treatment extended. Corresponding to the expression of CiGADs, there was a considerable increase in endogenous GABA with increasing duration of the NaCl treatment (Fig. 6C). The GABA content in roots increased rapidly, to 5.9-fold its initial level after 3 h of NaCl stress, and to more than 10-fold its initial level at 12 and 24 h of NaCl stress. In the leaves, the GABA content slightly increased after 3 h of NaCl stress, and markedly increased to 4.7–5.6 fold its initial level by 6 h of NaCl stress. These findings suggested that there was a positive correlation between the expression of CiGAD genes and GABA accumulation during NaCl stress.
ABA regulated CiGADs expression under NaCl stress
Treatment of NaCl-stressed seedlings with exogenous ABA significantly affected the expression of both CiGADs, and the changes in expression differed between the two genes (Fig. 7). In the roots, both CiGADs showed gradually increasing transcript levels with increasing concentrations of exogenous ABA at 3 h. However, CiGAD1 showed a 3.8-fold increase in its transcript levels in response to 0.5 µM ABA, similar to the increase in response to 200 µM ABA. The two genes showed almost opposite trends in expression in the roots at 24 h of treatment with ABA; the transcript levels of CiGAD1 decreased with increasing ABA concentrations, but were still much higher than the transcript levels of CiGAD2 (Fig. 7A). In the leaves, however, after 3 h of ABA treatment, low concentrations of exogenous ABA (0.5 and 1.0 µM) inhibited the expression of both CiGADs, but higher concentrations of ABA induced the expression of both genes. After 24 h of treatment with ABA, 0.5 µM ABA considerably increased the expression levels of both genes to more than 5.6-fold that in the control (0 µM ABA), but ABA at other concentrations drastically reduced the transcript levels of both genes, except for CiGAD1 at 10 µM ABA (Fig. 7B). These results demonstrated that, even at micromolar concentrations, ABA participates in regulating CiGAD1 and CiGAD2 transcription during salt stress.
Much attention has been paid to the roles of GABA in the development and stress responses of plants (Batushansky et al., 2014; Batushansky et al., 2015; Michaeli & Fromm, 2015; Molina-Rueda et al., 2015; Shi et al., 2010), and GAD is a key enzyme regulating GABA production and the GABA shunt pathway (Michaeli & Fromm, 2015; Shimajiri et al., 2013). In this study, two GAD genes (CiGAD1 and CiGAD2) were cloned based on specific EST sequences (Supplemental Information 1) identified in our previous work on the molecular response of C. intermedia to salt stress. These two genes had ORFs encoding 498- and 494-amino acid residues. Homology analyses showed that these two CiGADs exhibited relatively high similarity (72.1%–88.5%) to GADs from three model plants: soybean, Arabidopsis, and poplar, so CiGADs were classified into the GAD family (Fig. S2). The CaM/Ca2+-dependent GADs conserved the putative CaM-binding domain in plants, such as Arabidopsis (Turano & Fang, 1998), tomato (Gallego et al., 1995), and P. ginseng (Lee et al., 2010). But some GADs did not include CaM-binding domain, such as rice GAD2 (Akama et al., 2001). Sequence analyses confirmed that both of the CiGADs included a conserved PLP domain and a CaM-binding domain (Fig. 1; Trobacher et al., 2013), but whether both CiGADs were indeed activated via CaM or not need a further research (Mei et al., 2016). A phylogenetic analysis indicated that CiGAD1 and CiGAD2 were much more closely related to GAD genes in soybean than to GAD genes in the woody plant poplar (Fig. 2). Southern blot analysis confirmed that CiGAD1 had one copy and CiGAD2 -related genes were present as two copies in C. intermedia (Fig. 3). However, both AtGAD1 and AtGAD2 are single copy genes in Arabidopsis (Turano & Fang, 1998), and a single copy of GmGAD1 is also observed in soybean (Matsuyama et al., 2009). But there are at least two copies of the PgGAD in P. ginseng (Lee et al., 2010). These results indicate that the copy number of GAD genes depends on each plant.
The cloning of CiGADs genes will be useful for further research on their functions during plant development and stress responses. As mentioned in the Introduction, GADs are expressed in most tissues, but different GADs show different spatial and temporal expression patterns (Miyashita & Good, 2008; Akama et al., 2001; Liu et al., 2014). Our results showed that CiGAD1 was mainly expressed in the stems, leaves, and testae; whereas CiGAD2 was expressed at high levels in bark and was also expressed in the roots and testae (Fig. 4A). The expression patterns indicated that CiGAD2 might participate in vascular differentiation, like PpGAD in maritime pine (Molina-Rueda et al., 2010). Molina-Rueda et al. (2015) also reported that vascular development was closely linked to GABA production corresponding to PpGAD expression. Because the GAD activities were higher in testae and seeds, CiGAD1 and CiGAD2 may also play a role in plant reproduction like GADs in citrus fruit (Liu et al., 2014) and apples (Trobacher et al., 2013).
Several studies have shown that plant GADs expression responds differently to various abiotic stresses in herbaceous plants (Zhuang et al., 2010; Lee et al., 2010). Our previous findings showed that exogenous GABA can regulate the molecular responses of C. intermedia during salt stress via its roles in regulating signaling (reactive oxygen species, ethylene, and ABA-producing enzymes RBOH/ACO/ABA2) and nitrogen metabolism (nitrate transporter, arginase, nodulin) (Shi et al., 2010). These results prompted us to analyze the expression patterns of the two identified CiGADs in response to various stresses and exogenous ABA, which orchestrates the interaction between biotic and abiotic stresses via signaling pathways (Atkinson & Urwin, 2012). When Caragana seedlings were subjected to short-term (3 h) stress treatments including salinity (Na), heavy metals (Zn and Cd), heat (40 °C), cold (4 °C), and drought (3 h dehydration), the transcript levels of CiGAD1 and CiGAD2 increased in the roots and leaves (Fig. 3), possibly as a result of an increase in Ca2+ induced by each stress treatment (Akihiro et al., 2008). The only exception was that CiGAD2 transcript levels did not increase in response to Cd2+ (Figs. 4A, 4B), which is hypothesized to displace metal cofactors (such as Zn2+) from proteins or compete with Ca2+ to bind to Ca2+-binding proteins (Stohs & Bagchi, 1995). The salt stress treatment induced CiGAD1 and CiGAD2 expression more strongly in leaves (20.6–36.0 fold) than in roots (4.4–5.5 fold) (Figs. 5A, 5B). For comparison, PgGAD expression in P. ginseng increased 3-fold after 8 h of salt treatment (Lee et al., 2010). This result indicated that the two CiGADs might play a crucial role in the salt stress response in leaves.
In terms of heavy metal stress responses, the Zn treatment significantly increased expression of both CiGADs in leaves and roots, and induced a substantial increase in CiGAD1 expression (a 74.0-fold increase) in roots (Fig. 5A), whereas Cd had opposite effects on the two genes, inducing an increase in CiGAD1 expression (4.4–6.0 fold), but no change or a decrease in CiGAD2 expression (Figs. 5A, 5B). An analysis of the Arabidopsis transcriptome showed that AtGAD4 transcript levels increased 8.4-fold under a 50 µM Cd 2+ treatment (Weber, Trampczynska & Clemens, 2006). A surprising result in this study was that heat and cold stresses strongly induced expression of CiGAD1 and CiGAD2, especially in leaves; the transcript levels of these genes increased by 218.1-fold and 114.2-fold, respectively, in response to heat, and by 19.7-fold and 21.8-fold, respectively, in response to cold (Fig. 5B). For comparison, PgGAD expression in P. ginseng increased by 3–5 fold after 8-h heat and cold treatments (Lee et al., 2010). Next, we examined changes in the transcript levels of two CiGADs during a 24-h salt treatment, and observed constant increases in their expression (Figs. 6A, 6B) consistent with GABA accumulation (Fig. 6C). The present result suggested that these two CiGADs in Caragana were involved in multiple stress responses, especially the responses to Zn and heat stress.
In plants, the phytohormone ABA is a key endogenous signaling molecule in the responses to various stresses. Understanding ABA-signaling is essential for improving plant performance in the future (Atkinson & Urwin, 2012; Raghavendra et al., 2010). In our previous study, we found that exogenous GABA induced the expression of the ABA-biosynthetic gene ABA2 in Caragana under salt stress (Shi et al., 2010). Exogenous ABA has also been shown to enhance GAD activity and increase the GABA content in fava bean (Yang, Hui & Gu, 2016), and to induce the expression of ZmGAD1, which harbors ABA-related cis-elements in its promoter (Zhuang et al., 2010). In the present study, we found that exogenous ABA increased the transcript levels of CiGAD1 and CiGAD2 at an early stage (3 h) of the salt treatment (Figs. 7A, 7B); while after 24 h of salt treatment, the transcript levels of both genes were reduced in the roots of ABA-treated plants, but strongly increased in the leaves of plants treated with 0.5 µM ABA (Figs. 7A, 7B). These different transcriptional responses of CiGAD1 and CiGAD2 to exogenous ABA may be because of differences in ABREs in their promoter regions (Liu et al., 2014).
In conclusion, the results of this study showed that two CiGADs cloned from Caragana are closely related to homologs in another legume, soybean. The transcript levels of CiGAD2 were much higher than those of CiGAD1 in bark, suggesting that CiGAD2 might play a role in secondary growth of woody plants. The GAD activities were higher in testae and seeds than other tissues, CiGADs may also play a role in plant reproduction. Multiple stresses significantly affected the transcript levels of both CiGADs. Interestingly, Zn and heat stresses had the strongest effects on CiGAD1 expression, indicating that CiGAD1 plays important roles in the responses to Zn and heat stresses. Our results also suggested that ABA is involved in regulating these two CiGADs during stress in Caragana, an important nitrogen-fixing legume shrub. These results will be useful for further research on the role of GADs in carbon and nitrogen metabolism and in signal transduction during the responses to environmental stresses.
Amplification (A) and verification (B) of full-length CiGADs in Caragana intermedia
(A) Lane 1, 2: 5′ RACE of CiGAD1; Lane 3, 4: 5′ RACE of CiGAD2; Lane 5, 6: 3′ RACE of CiGAD1; Lane 7, 8: 3′ RACE of CiGAD2; the sequences included the common primer of UPM. (B) Lane 1, 2, 3, 4: PCR amplification of open reading frame (ORF) of CiGAD1; Lane 5, 6, 7, 8: PCR amplification of ORF in CiGAD2. Red arrows were targeted bands; M: 2,000 bp marker.
Alignment of amino acids of two CiGADs in Caragana intermedia with amino acids of GADs in Arabidopsis thaliana, Populus trichocarpa, Glycine max
Accession number: AtGAD1 (AT5G17330), AtGAD2 (AT1G65960). , AtGAD3 (AT2G02000), AtGAD4 (AT2G02010), AtGAD5 (AT3G17760), PtGAD1 (Potri.T059200), , PtGAD2 (Potri.004G075200), PtGAD3 (Potri.004G075300), PtGAD4 (Potri.010G100500),, PtGAD5 (Potri.012G039000), , GmGAD1 (Glyma02g40840), , GmGAD2 (Glyma09g29900), GmGAD3 (Glyma14g39170), GmGAD4 (Glyma16g34450), and GmGAD5 (Glyma18g04940). The abbreviation of gene names are as follows: At, Arabidopsis thaliana; Pt, Populus trichocarpa; Gm, Glycine max.
The EST sequences of CiGAD1 and CiGAD2
Two EST sequences were identified in C. intermedia under salt stress by RNA-seq.