@l_peer i'm not there but they might be talking about Vasilevsky et al https://t.co/vFerykAcOX ? In ARR I call any such case study a "census" https://t.co/t9exC99KDo
@brembs @bryanlougheed @bearore @richardhorton1 @eLife @PLOSMedicine @WellcomeOpenRes @BeilsteinInst https://t.co/cPvUCdV2zg
https://t.co/4RE7ZG9qbg
https://t.co/UG5cjL5qek
And some references therein.
Some of these could have been cited in your paper, so as to add more useful caveats. To my (naturally biased) eyes the paper is not trying too hard to falsify the main hypothesis.
@cmrherder @GreeneScientist @eturnermd1 @NavPersaud @RIATinitiative @Yale_CRIT @jsross119 @gregggonsalves @CMAJ @bmj_latest @DavidJuurlink @VinayPrasadMD @ontowonka @chrisdc77 @ScientificData Published this a couple year's back, so out of date, but you might find it helpful: https://t.co/oUNPbnOFmD. You might have more success by searching aggregated repositories for this kind of data. Have you reached out to the #DataLibrarian at Dalhousie?
'Reproducible and reusable research: are journal data sharing policies meeting the mark?' published 1 year ago @thePeerJ https://t.co/Dqdootp5zE. Have things really changed since then? #openaccess #datasharing #openscience #FAIR
Reproducible and reusable research: are journal data sharing policies meeting the mark? https://t.co/YYBQZcVhID #datasharing #opendata https://t.co/NOUhjkZIu8