Artificial reefs are anthropogenic structures that are deliberately or accidentally submerged, and often alter local habitat by providing vertical relief and a hard substratum where typically none previously existed (Bohnsack & Sutherland, 1985; Sheehy & Vik, 2010). In the Florida Keys, an island chain at the southernmost tip of Florida that is home to the world’s third-largest barrier reef system, reef environments are exposed to a wide range of environmental and anthropogenic stressors (Donahue et al., 2008). Consequently, the development of artificial reefs is viewed as one avenue to help mitigate human impacts on the natural reef environment (e.g., Harris & Woodring, 2001). The regional artificial marine substrata range from concrete and metal surfaces (as part of bridges, causeways, seawalls, lighthouses, and other navigational markers), to legally deployed wooden/plastic/concrete crayfish and stone crab traps (and their rogue versions after storm displacement), illegally placed artificial habitats to attract spiny lobsters (“casitas”), and shipwrecks, the latter both accidentally and intentionally sunk.
Florida has one of the most active artificial reef programs in the United States (Dodrill & Fletcher, 2012), with at least half of the nation’s human-made marine reefs within its border and a focus on developing recreational fisheries and the enhancement of SCUBA diving activities (Seaman, 2004). In the Florida Keys, artificial reefs primarily consist of shipwrecks. In addition to numerous vessels that foundered off the Florida Keys during storms or for other reasons over the centuries and remain as accidental wrecks, other vessels were deliberately placed on the ocean bottom. The latter include many ships used during missile tests and naval exercises, especially from the 1940s to the 1970s, with the wrecks of this so-called ‘Key West Ghost Fleet’ mostly lying in fairly deep water (56–128 m) between the island of Key West and the Dry Tortugas archipelago. Beginning in the 1960s, large vessels including decommissioned United States Coast Guard cutters were sunk in what is now the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary (FKNMS), to serve as artificial reefs. Four of these are formal parts of the ‘Florida Keys Shipwreck Trail’ (National Ocean Service, 2015). After the establishment of the FKNMS in the 1990s, several other ships were scuttled in the region, including the USS Spiegel Grove (2002, off Key Largo, upper Florida Keys), the Adolphus Busch (1998, off Summerland Key, middle Florida Keys), and the USNS General Hoyt S. Vandenberg (2009, off Key West, lower Florida Keys); see Fig. 1. These are very large vessels, with the 155-meter long Spiegel Grove holding the record as the largest artificial reef at the time of her sinking and the 160-meter long Vandenberg currently representing the second-largest artificial reef in the world (the largest now being the aircraft carrier USS Oriskany, placed in the Gulf of Mexico south off Pensacola, Florida). To provide sport diving attractions in accessible depth, these deliberately placed vessels usually rest about 10 km offshore, on sand bottoms in 34–44 m depth, with their superstructures extending into shallower water. Artificial reefs in the northern Gulf of Mexico, which are formed by numerous oil and gas platforms (“rigs to reefs,” e.g., Sammarco et al., 2014), are positioned in waters that until their introduction was nearly devoid of shallow hard substrata (Atchison, 2005) except for those in the vicinity of the Flower Garden Banks reefs (Sammarco, Atchison & Boland, 2004). In contrast, the string of shipwrecks off the Florida Keys is in close proximity to the living barrier reef.
The potential impacts of such artificial reef placements in what is recognized as a high priority region for biodiversity protection (Jenkins & Van Houtan, 2016) are topics of interest and concern. Artificial reefs in the Florida Keys are known to have substantive positive impacts of the local economy by benefitting dive charter and associated industries (Leeworthy, 2011; Johns, 2012). They can also reduce user pressure on the adjacent natural reefs as reported for one of the regional wrecks, the Spiegel Grove (Leeworthy, Maher & Stone, 2006), although this was not true for the Vandenberg, where the total use on both natural and artificial reefs increased after placement of the wreck (Leeworthy, 2011). Artificial reefs can effectively accumulate fish and other organisms (e.g., Bohnsack & Sutherland, 1985; Wilson et al., 2001), and may create corridors for further dispersal and expansion of both native and non-native species (Atchison, 2005; Sheehy & Vik, 2010; Broughton, 2012; Precht et al., 2014). The attraction of non-native (and potentially invasive) species is chief among “the unintended consequences of artificial reef construction and siting” (Lindberg & Seaman, 2011: 54). Formal monitoring of artificial reefs in Florida varies locally and concentrates on physical (e.g., temperature, reef movement), socio-economic (e.g., expenditures, usage), or biological impacts (e.g., species abundance) (e.g., Seaman, 2004). On the wrecks of the Florida Keys, formal biological monitoring has concentrated on fish populations (e.g., Akins & Semmens, 2011), and most discussions of aquatic invasive species in the Florida Keys have focused on the lion fish species, Pterois volitans (Linnaeus, 1758) and P. miles (Bennett, 1828) (e.g., Donahue et al., 2008; Schofield, 2009). Data on non-native invertebrates on the artificial reefs have remained anecdotal and, not surprisingly, are limited to a few species that stand out from the native fauna by their color or size.
The most visible among these is the orange cup coral, Tubastraea coccinea Lesson, 1829, an Indo-Pacific scleractinian species that has spread widely in the Atlantic (Cairns, 2000; Creed et al., 2016) and was first reported from Florida by Fenner & Banks (2004), where artificial structures appear to be its preferred habitat. The authors cited records for this species from artificial reef sites in the Florida Keys, including the USCGC William J. Duane (off Key Largo, upper Florida Keys). Since then, large populations have been reported on the wrecks of the Duane and the nearby Spiegel Grove (Shearer, 2010). A study by Ferry (2009) indicated that the species had not yet become established in the lower Florida Keys, however according to our own observations (January 2016; Fig. 2A), Tubastraea coccinea is now well established on the Vandenberg wreck off Key West.
Herein we review the occurrence of non-native, and potentially non-native, fouling invertebrates on artificial (shipwreck) reefs in the Florida Keys and document the regional occurrences of the foam oysters Hyotissa hyotis and H. mcgintyi, as well as the gastropod Cyclothyca pacei. We also describe a new vermetid gastropod species, Thylacodes vandyensis n. sp., recently discovered on these artificial substrata.
Materials and Methods
Molluscan fauna of natural reefs along the Florida Keys have been sampled by SCUBA intermittently over the past 30 years. Artificial reefs, the focus of this study, have been investigated since 2002 (as individually dated below), with specimens of the newly described vermetid gastropod species taken in May of 2014 and September of 2016. Artificial reef data presented herein are based on brief SCUBA-assisted surveys conducted by RB and PS on the following wrecks, arranged from NE to SW (see Fig. 1): the USS Spiegel Grove (a former US Navy dock landing ship intentionally sunk in 2002 off Key Largo, upper Florida Keys; 25°04′02′′N, 80°19′08′′W; sampled as FK-1026 in August 2012); the SS Benwood (a Norwegian merchant freighter that sunk after collision in 1942 and broke up subsequently; 25°03.144′N, 080°19.93′W; sampled as FK-1027 in August 2012); the Thunderbolt (originally a US Army mine planting ship and later modified as a lightning strike research vessel, intentionally sunk in 1986 off Key Vaca, middle Florida Keys; 24°39.663′N, 080°57.784′W; sampled as FK-717 in August 2003); the Adolphus Busch (a former cargo ship intentionally sunk in 1998 off Ramrod Key, lower Florida Keys; 24°31.841′N, 081°27.688′W; sampled as FK-908 in August 2009 and as FK-991 in November 2011); and the USNS General Hoyt S. Vandenberg (a former missile tracking ship intentionally sunk in 2009 off Key West, lower Florida Keys; 24°27.027′N, 081°43.991′W; sampled as FK-1068 in May 2014 and as FK-1148 in January 2016). Specimen collecting in the protected waters of the Florida Keys was conducted under Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary Research Permit FKNMS-2013-105 to RB. These collecting events were part of a preliminary qualitative investigation of molluscan species on these shipwrecks, and no formal quantitative sampling was undertaken during these dives.
Whole molluscan specimens were compared to material in the collections of the Field Museum of Natural History (FMNH) that resulted from extensive prior and ongoing surveys in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary (FKNMS; e.g., Bieler & Mikkelsen, 2004; Mikkelsen & Bieler, 2004; Mikkelsen & Bieler, 2007) and from studies on vermetid gastropods throughout the Atlantic Ocean (e.g., Bieler, 1995; Golding et al., 2014). Station designations beginning with “FK” refer to these ongoing biodiversity survey projects. FMNH number designations refer to specimen series lodged as voucher material and accessible in the Field Museum of Natural History (FMNH; database access under “invertebrates” at http://collections-zoology.fieldmuseum.org/). BivAToL numbers link to voucher material collected and previously cited in the context of the Bivalve Assembling-the-Tree-of-Life project (http://bivatol.org), with specimens likewise accessible via FMNH. Anatomical and morphological studies of the vermetid species followed the protocols outlined in Golding et al. (2014). Author/date references and acceptance of valid species follow the treatment in WoRMS (2017), except where specifically noted.
We used mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase 1 (COI) sequences in order to gauge whether the color morphs of the newly-described species likely represented intraspecific or species-level variation, and to see how much this new species differs at the COI locus from other Thylacodes species. We extracted the 530 nucleotide COI barcoding region from the complete mitochondrial genomes of three color morphs of Thylacodes vandyensis n. sp. (paratypes 1–3, see below). Similarly, the COI barcoding region was extracted from the complete mitochondrial genome for Thylacodes decussatus (Gmelin, 1791) (FMNH 327164, Belize). These complete genomes were generated on an Ion Torrent PGM with a 318 chip as part of a broader study of vermetid systematics in progress (Granados-Cifuentes et al., unpublished data). These COI sequences have been submitted to GenBank under the numbers KY586138, KY586139, KY586140, KY586141. In addition, we searched GenBank for COI sequences within the vermetid genus Thylacodes and the formerly used generic name Serpulorbis. We recovered 31 COI haplotypes of Thylacodes variabilis (Hadfield & Kay, 1972) (HM453681 –HM453711) from Hawaii, 1 haplotype of Thylacodes sp. from Australia (Colgan et al., 2007 [as Serpulorbis sp.]; AY296830), 1 haplotype of Thylacodes sp. from French Polynesia (Leray et al., 2013 as Serpulorbis; KC706891), 1 haplotype of Thylacodes squamigerus (Carpenter, 1857) from California, USA (Rawlings et al., 2010; HM174255), 1 haplotype of Thylacodes medusae Pilsbry, 1891 from Japan (Takano & Kano, 2014; AB930471), 1 haplotype of Thylacodes “imbricatus”1 from China (Zou, Li & Kong, 2011) as Serpulorbis imbricata; HQ834105) and 1 specimen of Thylacodes sp. from British Columbia, Canada (Layton, Martel & Hebert, 2014; KF643882). These sequences were aligned without indels using the program MAFFT (Katoh & Standley, 2013) in Mesquite (Maddison & Maddison, 2017). Absolute distances and uncorrected pairwise distances between sequences were generated in PAUP, version 4.0a151 (Swofford, 2002).
The electronic version of this article in Portable Document Format (PDF) will represent a published work according to the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN), and hence the new names contained in the electronic version are effectively published under that Code from the electronic edition alone. This published work and the nomenclatural acts it contains have been registered in ZooBank, the online registration system for the ICZN. The ZooBank LSIDs (Life Science Identifiers) can be resolved and the associated information viewed through any standard web browser by appending the LSID to the prefix http://zoobank.org/. The LSID for this publication is: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0535F741-EF90-49D7-B2DF-78E8E6EE8BC8. The online version of this work is archived and available from the following digital repositories: PeerJ, PubMed Central and CLOCKSS.
Non-native Bivalvia in the artificial reefs of the Florida Keys
The giant foam oyster, Hyotissa hyotis (Linnaeus, 1758)—also known as the giant honeycomb or giant coxcomb oyster, was the first report of a non-native molluscan species in the Florida Keys from shipwrecks, as discussed by Bieler et al. (2004) and Mikkelsen & Bieler (2007); Fig. 2B. This large-shelled Indo-Pacific species had frequently been confused with the presumably native foam oyster Hyotissa mcgintyi (Harry, 1985) [see discussion below and Fig. 2C], and Bieler et al. (2004) established that prior western Atlantic records of H. hyotis were in fact based on H. mcgintyi specimens. Hyotissa mcgintyi is widely distributed in the natural reef throughout the Florida Keys (e.g., in the Coffins Patch Sanctuary Preservation area in the middle Keys [FMNH 317472/FK-625], at Looe Key Reef in the middle Keys [FMNH 333460/FK-987], and off the Dry Tortugas [FMNH 317475/FK-606]. It also is a very common species on the investigated wrecks in all regions where it covers much of the available surface and acts as substratum for many other fouling organisms (e.g., Spiegel Grove, FMNH 335061/BivAToL-444/FK-1026, see ultrastructural sperm study in Healy, Mikkelsen & Bieler, 2015; Benwood, FMNH 335081/FK-1027; Thunderbolt, FMNH 302069/FK-717, see Figs. 83–94 and anatomical treatment in Simone, Mikkelsen & Bieler, 2015; Adolphus Busch, FMNH 333457/BivAToL-275/FK-908, see Figs. 2B, 8 and morphological and molecular analyses in Bieler et al., 2014a and Bieler et al., 2014b and Vandenberg, FMNH 341987/FK-1068).
A verified specimen of H. hyotis2 (FMNH 302010; for illustrations see Bieler & Mikkelsen, 2004: Figs. 3 and 4, and Mikkelsen & Bieler, 2007: 119) was first found in the Florida Keys in August of 2003 in about 30 m depth on the steel wreck of the lightning-strike research vessel Thunderbolt, off Marathon in the middle Florida Keys (FK-717). The 60-meter-long ship was intentionally sunk in 1986 as part of the Florida Keys Artificial Reef Association project and now lies intact on a sand bottom in about 37 m of water. An earlier unpublished record of another adult shell retrieved in 2001 north of the Florida Keys (off West Palm Beach; G Paulay, pers. comm. cited in Bieler et al., 2004) likewise came from about 30 m water depth. Since then, this species has also been found in the upper Keys on the wreck of the Spiegel Grove (FMNH 335064/FK-1026; August 2012, in 31 m) and in the lower Keys on the wreck of the Adolphus Busch (FMNH 332211/FK-991, November 2011, in 28 m), both first reported herein (Fig. 2B). The specimens from the Thunderbolt and Spiegel Grove wrecks became the basis for extensive anatomical studies of H. hyotis by Simone, Mikkelsen & Bieler (2015: Figs. 95–104).
It thus appears that non-native H. hyotis has established a population in the Florida Keys. This is in contrast to another large-shelled Indo-Pacific bivalve, the black-lipped pearl oyster Pinctada margaritifera (Linnaeus, 1758), specimens of which have been recorded at several locales off the South Florida coast since the early 1990s (e.g., Chesler, 1994; Carlton & Ruckelshaus, 1997), but apparently did not spread further or move to artificial reefs of the region (R Bieler, pers. obs.). Likewise, the non-native mussel species Perna perna (Linnaeus, 1758) and P. viridis (Linnaeus, 1758) that have been recorded from the Gulf of Mexico (e.g., Ingrao, Mikkelsen & Hicks, 2001) have not yet been reported from the Florida Keys.
Potentially non-native Gastropoda in the artificial reefs of the Florida Keys
Cyclothyca pacei (Petuch, 1987) is a small-shelled, cap-shaped gastropod species first reported from shallow-water in Biscayne Bay, Florida. Originally described as a member of the caenogastropod family Capulidae, the species is now recognized as a member of the heterobranch (pyramidelloidean) family Amathinidae that lives as an ectosymbiont on living specimens of pectinid (e.g., Caribachlamys) and spondylid (Spondylus spp.) bivalves. It is not uncommonly collected off Southeastern Florida (Petuch, 1987; Lee, 2011) and is now well established on the artificial reefs off the Florida Keys, herein first reported from the wrecks of the Spiegel Grove (FMNH 328533/FK-1026, August 2012), Thunderbolt (FMNH 301979/FK-717, August 2003), and Vandenberg (FMNH 328533/FK-1068, May 2014); Fig. 2D. The Thunderbolt specimens formed the basis for an anatomical analysis of this species by Simone (2011).
Because C. pacei associates with scallop species that are very popular with shell collectors, Lee (2011) suggested that the relatively recent discovery of the nominal species might indicate a recent arrival to the Florida fauna. Lee also proposed that it might be an ecomorph of the larger-shelled Pacific Ocean species Amathina tricarinata (Linnaeus, 1767), and compared it also to the eastern Pacific species C. corrugata Stearns, 1891. The latter species, originally described from the Pacific coast of Nicaragua and only recently recollected (Stearns, 1891; Garcia, 1996) might indeed be conspecific. Unfortunately no anatomical and/or molecular samples are available for the Pacific form; however, DNA samples have been vouchered, and gene sequences generated, from Florida specimens. We consider C. pacei/corrugata as a likely non-native species of Pacific origin with extensive populations on Florida’s artificial reefs. It has yet to be reported from shallower water and/or natural habitats in the Florida Keys.
In the following, we describe an additional gastropod, a new species of the caenogastropod family Vermetidae, from the artificial reefs. To date it is known only from the wreck of the Vandenberg:
Type locality: Wreck of the USNS General Hoyt S. Vandenberg, between Western Sambo Reef and Sand Key, about 11 km off Key West, Florida, USA, Atlantic Ocean24°27.164′N, 081°43.594′W; in about 29 m depth (see Fig. 1).
Material examined: All specimens from type locality. Paratypes 1–3 from collecting event FK-1068 (26 May 2014), all others, including holotype, from collecting event FK-1148 (9 January 2016): Holotype (Fig. 3A): FMNH 344615: wholly dry-preserved specimen (greatest length of attached shell mass 18.5 mm, outside diameter of feeding tube aperture 5.0 mm) on substratum (shell of Hyotissa mcgintyi), with juvenile Paratype-4 (FMNH 377465, greatest length of entire shell 6.6 mm). Additional paratypes (not numbered; multiple specimens, dry and in various preservation fluids): FMNH 344619 (with specimens of Fig. 3B), 344614 (with specimens of Figs. 3C–3F, 4D), 344616, 344617, 357557, 357587, 376313, 376314). Paratype-1 (Fig. 4A), FMNH 328529: 1 specimen removed from shell of Hyotissa mcgintyi (body in 80% ethanol, tissue samples, dry shell voucher). Paratype-2 (Fig. 4B), FMNH 328530: 1 specimen removed from shell of Spondylus americanus (body in 80% ethanol, tissue samples, dry shell voucher). Paratype-3 (Fig. 4C), FMNH 328531: 1 specimen removed from shell of Hyotissa mcgintyi (body in 80% ethanol, tissue samples, dry shell voucher). Paratype-5 deposited in Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Madrid, Spain, MNCN 15.05/200050 (1 specimen wholly preserved in 80% ethanol; ex FMNH 344616).
Teleoconch (Figs. 2A, 3A–3C, 5B): Largest length of attached individual adult shell mass usually 20–25 mm; length of standing portion of adult tube above attached shell mass 9–25 mm; largest diameter of attached shell whorl about 6–7 mm; diameter at apertural opening of feeding tube in adults about 4.5–6.5 mm. Not entrenching into the substratum; with convoluted, irregular growth, often changing direction and wrapping back over earlier coils, with sharp elbow-like bends that frequently show remnants of earlier feeding tubes; attached adult whorls often widened into an attachment flange; earlier whorls abandoned and closed off by shell septa, with body residing in final 2–3 attached whorls; early whorls remaining narrow for several, usually loose, coils and with growth lines and/or densely spaced transverse ribbing (Figs. 3C–3E); later whorls with faint to well-expressed longitudinal ribbing; when well-expressed this sculpture consisting of about 6 larger ribs visible on the surface of attached whorls, with 1–3 weaker ones in the interspaces; ribs forming knobs and fine scales at intersections with growth marks; last part of whorls usually as an erect feeding tube, narrower and thinner-walled than the preceding attached part and lacking longitudinal sculpture; terminal feeding tube portion often further narrowed; thin apertural edge often very finely scalloped, resulting in corresponding microscopic scale pattern on the shells. Inside wall of shell tube macroscopically smooth, without columellar laminae.
Color overall light to reddish tan, with knobby parts of ribs, especially in the flange area of thicker-shelled adult whorls, lighter.
Protoconch (Figs. 3C–3E): About 1.5 rapidly expanding bulbous whorls, forming narrow umbilicus; lower part of whorl with weakly (Fig. 3C) to strongly (Fig. 3E) developed spiral rib; surface smooth except for weak wrinkles near spiral rib (Fig. 3C) and densely spaced, microscopic, spiral striae, most visible near apertural lip; light reddish tan, initial part lighter colored.
Radula (Fig. 3F): Length of adult radular ribbon about 3.1 mm; up to 30 rows. Taenioglossate; rachidian and lateral teeth with 3 (sometimes 4) cusps on either side of strong central cusp; inner marginal tooth with long and strong main cusp, 3–4 small cusps on outer side, and single longer cusp on inner side; slender outer marginal tooth with single cusp on inner side. No difference noted between grey and orange morphs.
External morphology and soft-body coloration (Figs. 4A–4D): Comparatively stocky vermetid body, with plug-like head-foot complex and very short (rarely more than 3 mm long) free end of columellar muscle. Color in life: Polychromatic: Orange morph (Figs. 4A and 4B): Pedal disk with overall deep orange tissue coloration, with white lines radiating from a position near the mouth and extending and divaricating toward the pedal side; white line pattern usually strongest near pedal-side margin, with concentrated areas of orange pigment between them at the edge, resulting in a more or less regular alternating orange-white pattern. Head-foot areas entirely without black pigment (except eye spots), with mottled pattern of white and orange; both pairs of tentacles, but especially pedal tentacles, with small white pigment granules; inside mantle salmon colored. Grey morph (Figs. 4C, 4D; 5B, 5C): As above, but the orange within-tissue base coloration covered and/or mostly (but never completely) replaced by near-black; the resulting combination of this dark tissue with the orange granules and whitish lines near the surface imparting overall olive-grey (in extreme cases, velvety black) appearance; inside mantle of these animals off-white. Both color morphs usually with the mantle edge lined with alternating pattern of yolk-yellow and narrower translucent white pattern (with yellow blotches in the dark form often showing fine black pigment on outside margin; Figs. 4A, 4C), but some specimen of both color forms lacking the yolk-yellow pigment entirely (Figs. 4B and 4D). Mantle cavity region usually intensely orange, even in specimens with black head-foot (Fig. 4D). Ethanol-preserved specimens (80%) fade to overall tan, with only the black head-foot pigment remaining.
Pallial and reproductive anatomy (Figs. 4D and 5A): Gill with up to 120 orange leaflets, about 22 per mm in the adult mid-gill. Reproductive females with anterior mantle slit to accommodate stalk of egg capsules, which are brooded in the mantle cavity and attached to the inside wall of the shell tube.
Development (Fig. 5A): 3–5 short-stalked whitish-translucent egg capsules per female observed herein, about 4.0–4.2 mm in length close to hatching; 12–16 embryos per capsule. Hatchlings with translucent-tan shells; brown stains in suture and umbilical area; crawling with vela fully resorbed.
Habitat and ecology (Figs. 2A; 5B, 5C): Affixed to substratum (mostly shells of living and dead Spondylus americanus Hermann, 1871 and Hyotissa mcgintyi), in current-exposed settings on the wreck’s superstructure, hull, and rails shared with the bivalves Arca zebra (Swainson, 1833), Acar sp. [“domingensis” of authors], Barbatia candida (Helbling, 1779) [all Arcidae]; Pinctada imbricata Röding, 1798 [Pteriidae]; Isognomon radiatus (Anton, 1838) [Isognomonidae]; Ctenoides mitis (Lamarck, 1807) [Limidae]; Lindapecten muscosus (Wood, 1828) [Pectinidae]; Anomia sp. [Anomiidae]; Dendostrea frons (Linnaeus, 1758) [Ostreidae]; Spondylus ambiguus Chenu, 18443 ; Spondylidae]; Gastrochaena sp. [Gastrochaenidae]; Chama macerophylla Gmelin, 1791, and Chama sp. [Chamidae]; the orange tube coral Tubastraea coccinea; the red encrusting sponge Mycale sp. (Demospongiae: Poecilosclerida: Mycalidae); and various other invertebrates yet to be identified (voucher specimens of listed mollusks deposited in FMNH). Adult shells found singly, in pairs, or in clusters; occasionally with settled juveniles on the outside shell tube. Active suspension feeder by mucous web (Fig. 5B).
Density: First discovered, in small numbers, in about 29 m depth on the wreck of the USNS Vandenberg off Key West in in May of 2014, exactly five years after the vessel was sunk at the site. About 19 months later, in January 2016, the population had spread over much of the current-exposed parts of the wreck in the 30 m depth range. Short dive durations did not allow for extensive density measurement to date, but in the apparently most densely settled areas on the deck’s rails, 9 adults (plus juveniles) were recorded from a single 5 × 5 cm surface area.
Distribution: Currently only known from the type locality.
Etymology: vandyensis, -e: named for the wreck of the “Vandy,” the nickname given by the SCUBA diving community to the USNS General Hoyt S. Vandenberg, a retired naval vessel sunk to serve as an artificial reef off the lower Florida Keys.
Comparative and taxonomic remarks: Because of the serpulid-worm-like irregular shell morphology of vermetids that defies classification attempts based solely on adult shell characters, and the unusually complex historic literature of this group that is commingled with that of polychaete worms and various other uncoiling molluscan groups (e.g., Bieler, 1996), vermetid taxonomy needs to be based on multiple suites of characters. Among others, these include aspects of the larval shell, the coloration of the head-foot and mantle edge, the morphology and organization of the egg capsules, and—when present—the morphology of the operculum (e.g., Golding et al., 2014). Whereas most vermetids have a more-or-less elaborate operculum allowing for partial or complete closure of the aperture, at least one clade does not. This non-operculate vermetid group, to which Thylacodes vandyensis n. sp. belongs, has been known in the literature largely under the generic name Serpulorbis Sasso, 1827, which was shown to be a synonym of Thylacodes Guettard, 1770 by Bieler & Petit (2010). Five western Atlantic species were traditionally placed in Serpulorbis/Thylacodes (Rosenberg, 2009), two of which (Serpulorbis birugosus Weisbord, 1962 and S. catella Weisbord, 1962) are now recognized to be based on polychaete worm tubes (Bieler & Petit, 2011). Two others, T. decussatus (Gmelin, 1791) and T. riisei (Mörch, 1862), differ from T. vandyensis n. sp. in having shells with much more developed longitudinal ribs and a pedal coloration lacking white streaks (R Bieler, pers. obs.). Thylacodes squamolineatus (Petuch, 2002), a poorly known taxon originally described, as Serpulorbis, from a single tube fragment collected in the Bimini Chain, Bahamas, has a much larger shell with an apertural diameter exceeding 10 mm and also a more strongly developed longitudinal sculpture on its (based on the limited available material, apparently white) shell. The shell of T. vandyensis n. sp. is superficially similar to those of species of Petaloconchus (e.g., P. varians [d’Orbigny, 1839]) occurring in shallower waters in Florida, but members of that group differ in many morphological features including the presence of opercula and columellar shell laminae.
Species of Thylacodes often are polychromatic in their head-foot tissue appearance (R Bieler, pers. obs.), but usually share a specific pattern of the mantle edge. The facultative lack of black and/or yellow pigment in parts of this population initially suggested the presence of more than one species (but see molecular markers, below). We are aware of additional, currently unnamed, vermetid species in the western Atlantic that lack opercula and would thus traditionally be placed in Serpulorbis/Thylacodes. None of these match the combination of shell characters and, where known, head-foot coloration of the newly described species.
In the Mediterranean and eastern Atlantic Ocean, the much larger-shelled Thylacodes arenarius (Linnaeus, 1758) reaches a shell aperture diameter of 11–15 mm and its head-foot and mantle coloration is characterized by a different pattern of a usually wine-red base color with solid-white streaks and patches (R Bieler, pers. obs.).
Our research team is very familiar with the Atlantic worm-snail fauna and we have not encountered this relatively large-shelled vermetid species anywhere in the field or in extensively studied museum collections. By contrast, we are aware from preliminary studies that large numbers of vermetid species in the Indo-Pacific have remained undescribed. We therefore consider it likely that this species is a recent arrival from Pacific waters, parallel to the case of the foam oyster Hyotissa hyotis. Comparative morphological data for Indo-Pacific members of Thylacodes were compiled by Kelly (2007, Table 1; as Serpulorbis); none of these match the characters here observed for T. vandyensis n. sp. Although there was great variation in shell sculpture and soft-body color and patterning in Thylacodes vandyensis n. sp., the amount of COI variation was modest among the three color morphs sampled. Sequence divergence ranged from 0.38% to 0.94%, which is well within the typical range of intraspecific variation for this locus (Hebert et al., 2003). Thylacodes vandyensis n. sp. COI sequences were most similar to those reported for Thylacodes medusae sampled from off Misaki in Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan (Takano & Kano, 2014) , differing by 17.7 to 18.1%, and those of Thylacodes “imbricatus” [adamsii] from China (Zou, Li & Kong, 2011), differing by 20.3 to 20.8%. Both of these species are much larger- and sturdier-shelled, with adult apertural shell diameters of T. medusae (e.g., FMNH 138381, syntypes, Japan) reaching at least twice those of T. vandyensis n. sp.
With nearly 400 bivalve species and some 1,300 gastropod species currently recognized as occurring in the Florida Keys (Bieler & Mikkelsen, 2004; R Bieler & PM Mikkelsen, 2017, unpublished data; Mikkelsen & Bieler, 2000; Mikkelsen & Bieler, 2004; Mikkelsen & Bieler, 2007), the majority of them small-bodied and cryptic, distinguishing between native and non-native fauna is difficult. Geographic boundaries in the marine environment are literally fluid, and an “unusual occurrence” might be the result of a mere expansion of a nearby distribution, an extension of a deeper-water taxon into shallower depths, or part of the natural range of a previously overlooked local species. Recognition of non-indigenous species in an area requires baseline data on natural species distribution, taxonomic expertise to reliably identify species, and monitoring efforts to recognize unusual occurrences. Taxonomic identification at the species level warrants specialized morphological knowledge and, ideally, verification with molecular data. The appearance of an unusual species on a monitored artificial reef may be a minor extension of a native species or it can be the first sign of an invasive event. Often, the investigator needs to look at museum-based specimens of prior decades to establish historic presence or absence in the region, as was done in the studies that first reported Tubastraea coccinea and Hyotissa hyotis as recent non-native arrivals, as well as with the newly reported vermetid species herein. Whereas some of the molluscan species that commonly occur on the deeper artificial reefs, such as Arca zebra and Spondylus americanus, clearly are members of the Floridian/Caribbean fauna and merely extended their populations to the newly available substratum, others will require additional investigation. In addition to the case of Cyclothyca pacei described above, these also include the previously mentioned foam oyster Hyotissa mcgintyi, the most common oyster on the wrecks of the Florida Keys (see Fig. 2C). Originally named as Ostrea thomasi McLean, 1941 and described from a single specimen dredged off Palm Beach, Florida, it was later renamed as Parahyotissa mcgintyi Harry, 1985 because of homonymy with the unrelated Ostrea sellaeformis var. thomasii Glenn, 1904 (Harry, 1985). In southeast Florida, it was described as “uncommon: below low tide and on offshore wrecks” by Abbott (1974: 457, misidentified as Pycnodonte hyotis). H. mcgintyi is well known from Gulf of Mexico oil and gas platforms where it is one of the most abundant oysters (Harry, 1986) and is “abundant on the offshore coral reefs off Texas and locally almost reef forming on Miocene shale outcrops” according to Odé (1980: 49, misidentified as Pycnodonte hyotis). In the Florida Keys, it now is a very common species both in the natural barrier reef and on the artificial reefs. How long Hyotissa mcgintyi has been a member of the western Atlantic fauna is not yet clear; it has been considered conspecific with an eastern Atlantic oyster by Huber (2010 under the forgotten name “Parahyotissa rosea (Gmelin, 1791)”) and may in fact be a fairly recent arrival itself that spread quickly on artificial reefs in the Gulf of Mexico and the Florida Keys.
In the cases of the introduced bivalves reported above, ballast water and vessel hull fouling were considered the most likely vectors of introduction (e.g., Bieler et al., 2004). As sessile members of the fouling community, vermetids are particularly capable of dispersal by rafting and individual species have been tagged as potentially invasive in the Pacific Ocean (Bieler in Carlton, 1999: 449; Vermetus alii Hadfield & Kay, 1972, now recognized as Eualetes tulipa [Rousseau in Chenu, 1843]) or with a high potential to be invasive (Strathmann & Strathmann, 2006). In contrast to accidentally sunk ships, the deliberately scuttled vessels of the Florida Keys are less likely to have carried invasive species at the time of their sinking, as cleaning of the vessels from environmentally harmful substances and potentially invasive species have been mandatory parts of the preparation and permitting process in recent years (EPA, 2006). Vessel cleaning has not always been successful, however, such as in the failed attempt to kill the entire fouling community on the decommissioned battleship, USS Missouri, through prolonged immersion in brackish water prior to its transfer to Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. This resulted in the spawning and successful recruitment of the Mediterranean mussel (Mytilus galloprovincialis Lamarck, 1819) to surfaces within Pearl Harbor (including the ballast tank of a US Navy submarine) within days to weeks of the ship’s arrival (Apte et al., 2000).
Challenges for a colonizer include (1) the initial dispersal to the site and (2) the successful growth and maintenance of a viable population. Species with long-lived swimming larvae can reach newly available sites comparatively quickly. It is therefore no surprise that among the few predatory gastropods found during this study on the Vandenberg wreck are members of the Ranellidae (Monoplex nicobaricus [Röding, 1798], FMNH 342016, 376315; Monoplex pilearis [Linnaeus, 1758], FMNH 377029) and Bursidae (Bursa rhodostoma [G. B. Sowerby II, 1835], FMNH 377028), groups known to have long-range, teleplanic larvae (e.g., Scheltema, 1971; Scheltema, 1972). However, with the often very strong current at these artificial wreck sites, a mandatory long larval phase would not support the rapid buildup of a local population from a few founders (or even a single gravid female). Vermetids are known to show a range of reproductive modes, with some species releasing swimming larvae that need to feed and grow in the plankton, whereas in others the females brood the developing embryos and larvae in the mantle cavity until crawling juveniles emerge. Thylacodes vandyensis n. sp. belongs to the latter group with crawl-away juveniles hatching from brooded egg capsules. As discussed by Johannesson (1988), direct-developing species can often have much wider geographic distributions than would be predicted based on the limited dispersal abilities of juveniles and adults. Despite the absence of a planktonic larval form, these species have colonized isolated locations such as oceanic islands, often far from presumed source populations (e.g., Johannesson, 1988; O’ Foighil, 1989), likely through rafting events or hitchhiking as part of fouling communities (Winston, 2012). For vermetids such as Thylacodes vandyensis n. sp., which form permanent attachments to both natural and artificial surfaces in the marine environment, such a lifestyle predisposes them to transport on vessel hulls and other drifting substrates and potentially to this type of introduction to new habitats. Vermetid hatchlings have been observed to produce mucous threads that are then transported by water currents (Strathmann & Strathmann, 2006) which can provide a mechanism by which these juvenile vermetids move within a habitat but also potentially colonize new habitats such as artificial reefs. Once present in a new location, founder populations consisting of direct developing species can also experience rapid rates of population growth associated with the low mobility of their life-history stages which ensure high encounter frequencies between individuals for mating (Johannesson, 1988). Traits associated with vermetids including intracapsular development within the protective confines of their shell tube, long term sperm storage, and hermaphroditism in some species (Calvo & Templado, 2005; Strathmann & Strathmann, 2006) can also be viewed as traits enhancing rapid population growth of founding populations.
The creation of novel, initially-empty habitats such as artificial reefs may have important consequences for arriving non-native species and adjacent natural populations. These new habitats may act as beach heads or stepping-stones for non-native species (Simberloff, 1997; Glasby et al., 2007). Although there is a steady flow of ship traffic in the Florida Keys, these artificial reefs may act as permanent way-stations for arriving non-natives, providing nurseries within which populations may grow in an environment with reduced competition compared to native habitats (Tyrell & Byers, 2007), and then, in some cases, spread to natural habitats (Bulleri & Airoldi, 2005; Glasby et al., 2007). Hard substrates, such as those found on sunken vessels, have, in particular, been implicated in the establishment and spread of non-native populations (Ruiz et al., 2009; Sheehy & Vik, 2010), and, since non-native species are most often transported on artificial substrates such as ship’s hulls and ballast tanks, they may be pre-adapted to life on sunken vessels. In the Florida Keys, ships visiting these artificial reefs for recreational use may facilitate the further spread of fouling organisms (Sheehy & Vik, 2010). Of course, many native species also become established in these new habitats, but the fauna of artificial reefs may remain distinct from surrounding natural reefs (Carvalho et al., 2013), in some cases on the scale of a century or more (Perkol-Finkel, Shashar & Benayahu, 2006). All of this suggests that artificial reefs are one of the best places in the marine environment to monitor regularly for the presence of newly arrived non-native species (Ruiz et al., 2009; Peirano, 2013) and identification of new and potentially problematic non-native species at the earliest stages of their introduction increases the chances of effective control or eradication.
Although vermetids are common constituents of coral reef habitats, there is growing evidence of negative interactions between vermetids and neighboring coral species. As recently summarized by Shima, Phillips & Osenberg (2016), vermetids can cause growth anomalies in corals and are known to substantially reduce coral growth (Colgan, 1985; Zvuloni, Armoza-Zvuloni & Loya, 2008; Shima, Osenberg & Stier, 2010; Stier et al., 2010; Shima, Phillips & Osenberg, 2013) and might be able to shift coral species composition in a region (Shima, Osenberg & Stier, 2010). Colgan (1985) suggested that the vermetid mucous feeding web can inhibit its coral host’s growth in four ways: by reducing water circulation, by attenuating light, by intercepting food, or by irritating the coral’s surface. Indeed, the presence of vermetids and their interaction with coral tissue also appear to trigger pathogenic processes or increase the rate of coral disease transmissions. Misinterpreting the feeding ecology of the suspension feeding vermetids as “corallivorous” (Al-Hammady & Mohamed, 2016: 5), the authors claimed that the most commonly encountered coral disease in their Red Sea study area, atramentous necrosis, “is always associated with Vermetidae4 predation” (2016: 1). In fact, the deleterious effect on the coral tissue surrounding the vermetid feeding tube (including tissue necrosis) has been shown to stem from bioactive metabolites generated by the vermetids and included in their mucous feeding nets (Klöppel et al., 2013). The bioactive substances seem to have at least two different effects beneficial to the vermetids: fish avoid the feeding webs (Klöppel et al., 2013; R Bieler, pers. obs.) and coral growth around the settled vermetid is reduced or even stopped. As a consequence, the introduction of a new vermetid species to the natural reefs of the Florida Keys may have deleterious effects on coral growth and survival.
The artificial reefs of the Florida Keys attract invertebrate species that are recognized as non-native (the orange tube coral Tubastraea coccinea and the giant foam oyster Hyotissa hyotis, both herein reported from new localities). Some other molluscan species common on these wrecks may likewise be of extra-regional origin (Hyotis mcgintyi and Cyclothyca pacei). The newly described vermetid species, whatever its point of origin, is a new arrival to the Florida Keys. Thylacodes vandyensis n. sp. is perhaps atypical of non-native arrivals in that it broods its young in egg capsules that hatch crawl-away juveniles. While this would seem to lower the chances of initial arrival, it would increase its chances of establishment on a sunken vessel in strong currents. A potential transfer of any newly arrived species from the artificial reefs into the nearby barrier reef system would be a valid concern in any case. In this particular situation, involving a member of Vermetidae, the situation is of special interest and concern as vermetid-coral interactions are known to be potentially harmful to hard coral growth and survival. Vermetids have also been shown to function as intermediate hosts for blood flukes (family Spirochiidae) that parasitize the loggerhead turtle, Caretta caretta (Linnaeus, 1758), see Cribb et al. (2017). Years of focused taxonomic study on the mollusks, access to historical museum collections, and regular resampling within the Florida Keys enabled these discoveries. It is likely that similar discoveries await in other taxonomic groups. A modest investment in regular “bioblitz” sampling with broad taxonomic expertise within sentinel habitats such as artificial reefs and marinas would enable much earlier recognition of new and potentially problematic non-native species, facilitating effective responses. Ongoing monitoring of the developing molluscan fauna on the artificial reefs of the Florida Keys will be a vital part of assuring natural reef health and providing the necessary evidence for implementation of control or eradication measures when new and potentially problematic non-native species are discovered.