WANT A PROFILE LIKE THIS?
Create my FREE Plan Or learn about other options
Daniel Graziotin
PeerJ Author & Reviewer
1,315 Points

Contributions by role

Author 540
Preprint Author 35
Reviewer 140
Editor 600
Preprint Feedback 15

Contributions by subject area

Psychiatry and Psychology
Statistics
Human-Computer Interaction
Social Computing
Software Engineering
Bioinformatics
Neurology
Science Policy
Computational Science
Data Science
Theory and Formal Methods
Data Mining and Machine Learning
Mobile and Ubiquitous Computing
Network Science and Online Social Networks
Text Mining
Computational Biology
Ecology
Evolutionary Studies

Daniel Graziotin

PeerJ Author & Reviewer

Summary

Daniel Graziotin is a full professor of information systems and digital technologies at the University of Hohenheim, Germany. He earned his PhD in computer science and software engineering from the Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Italy. His research focuses on interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary approaches, incorporating theories, methods, and measurements from social and behavioral sciences, to enhance the understanding and integration of human factors in technology development and implementation.

Prof. Dr. Daniel Graziotin is academic editor at the PeerJ Computer science journal, academic editor at the Research Ideas and Outcomes journal, editorial advisory board member at the Journal of Open Research Software, and editorial board member at the Empirical Software Engineering journal. He has also served on the organizing committees of multiple international research conferences (ICSE, ESEC/FSE, ESEM, XP, PROFES) and workshops (CHASE, SEmotion) as well as serving on dozens of program committees. He drives the open science initiative at the ACM Special Interest Group on Software Engineering (SIGSOFT) to foster the practice of open access, open data, and open source at the various research venues in software engineering.

His work has been awarded with the ACM SIGSOFT Distinguished Paper Award and Best Presentation Award in 2022, the Journal of Systems and Software Best Paper award in 2019, the Jean-Claude Guédon Prize in 2018, the European Design Award (bronze) in 2016, and the Data Journalism Award in 2015. He has been the recipient of a two-year Alexander von Humboldt (AvH) Fellowship for Postdoctoral Researchers in 2017.

Science Policy Software Engineering

Past or current institution affiliations

Universität Hohenheim
Universität Stuttgart

Work details

Full Professor

Universität Hohenheim
Information Systems and Digital Technologies

Akademischer Rat

Universität Stuttgart
September 2019 - March 2024
Institute of Software Engineering
Tenured position as  Akademischer Rat A13 (comparable to Assistant Professor). Head of the division for Human Aspects of Software Engineering.

Websites

  • GitHub
  • Google Scholar
  • ORCID
  • LinkedIn
  • I need coffee

PeerJ Contributions

  • Articles 4
  • Preprints 1
  • Edited 3
  • Reviewed 3
  • Feedback 2
  • Answers 2
August 10, 2020
A methodology for psycho-biological assessment of stress in software engineering
Jan-Peter Ostberg, Daniel Graziotin, Stefan Wagner, Birgit Derntl
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.286
February 4, 2019
A theory on individual characteristics of successful coding challenge solvers
Marvin Wyrich, Daniel Graziotin, Stefan Wagner
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.173
August 19, 2015
How do you feel, developer? An explanatory theory of the impact of affects on programming performance
Daniel Graziotin, Xiaofeng Wang, Pekka Abrahamsson
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.18
March 11, 2014
Happy software developers solve problems better: psychological measurements in empirical software engineering
Daniel Graziotin, Xiaofeng Wang, Pekka Abrahamsson
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.289 PubMed 24688866
August 22, 2013 - Version: 1
Traverse the landscape of the mind by walking: an exploration of a new brainstorming practice
Xiaofeng Wang, Daniel Graziotin, Juha Rikkilä, Pekka Abrahamsson
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.51v1

Academic Editor on

December 20, 2024
The impact of new package managers on the library dependency ecosystem
Kristiina Rahkema, Dietmar Pfahl, Rudolf Ramler
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.2617
November 9, 2023
Looking for related posts on GitHub discussions
Marcia Lima, Igor Steinmacher, Denae Ford, Evangeline Liu, Grace Vorreuter, Tayana Conte, Bruno Gadelha
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.1567
October 21, 2022
Who is in the sample? An analysis of real and surrogate users as participants in user study research in the information technology fields
Joni Salminen, Soon-gyo Jung, Ahmed Kamel, Willemien Froneman, Bernard J. Jansen
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.1136

Signed reviews submitted for articles published in PeerJ Note that some articles may not have the review itself made public unless authors have made them open as well.

April 21, 2021
Understanding experiments and research practices for reproducibility: an exploratory study
Sheeba Samuel, Birgitta König-Ries
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11140 PubMed 33976964
September 12, 2018
Trust and distrust in information systems at the workplace
Meinald T. Thielsch, Sarah M. Meeßen, Guido Hertel
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5483 PubMed 30225161
December 22, 2015
Reliability and validity of neurobehavioral function on the Psychology Experimental Building Language test battery in young adults
Brian J. Piper, Shane T. Mueller, Alexander R. Geerken, Kyle L. Dixon, Gregory Kroliczak, Reid H.J. Olsen, Jeremy K. Miller
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1460 PubMed 26713233

Provided feedback on

1 vote
26 Aug 2013

Nine simple ways to make it easier to (re)use your data

This is a nicely written article. It is an introduction to the realization/implementation of Open Data in the research context. I think it achieves the aim. The language is simpl...

04 Sep 2013

Traverse the landscape of the mind by walking: an exploration of a new brainstorming practice

I report here a feedback received from a tweet by Leif Singer. " last time I checked group brainstorming was debunked. There should be current research along those lines. Discus...

2 Answers

0
Linear fit?
0
No experimental manipulation?