All reviews of published articles are made public. This includes manuscript files, peer review comments, author rebuttals and revised materials. Note: This was optional for articles submitted before 13 February 2023.
Peer reviewers are encouraged (but not required) to provide their names to the authors when submitting their peer review. If they agree to provide their name, then their personal profile page will reflect a public acknowledgment that they performed a review (even if the article is rejected). If the article is accepted, then reviewers who provided their name will be associated with the article itself.
I believe that the revised version properly addressed the points raised by the reviewers and can now be acceptable for publication.
Reviewers 1 & 2 provided many detailed suggestions throughout the text, so I'd suggest you pay particular attention to the comments on their corresponding pdfs.
All raw measurement data of both male and female for all described and redescribed species should be provided in tabular form as additional supplementary material.
No comments
No comments
Kindly refer to the annotated pdf
No Comments
No Comments
No Comments
The manuscript as well as all supplementary materials are very well written. I have just some minor comments provided directly into the .pdf file of manuscript (see attachment) and some comments to Suppl. mat. 2:
Page 1
Lines 9-10:
"OL, distance between posterior and anterior ocelli (measured from
posterior ocellus to anterior ocellus)" - this abbreviation is redundant as it is not mention along the text
Line 30:
"Bouché," - replace by "Bouché."
Page 3
Line 16:
"Notauli" - should be replaced by "notaulus"
Line 22:
"1/2x" - should be replaced by "0.5x"
Line 30
"(BMNH)" - replace by "(BMNH))"
Page 4
Line 21:
"1/5x" - should be replaced by "0.2x"
Line 33:
"Notauli" - should be replaced by "notaulus"
Page 5
Line 5:
"1/5x" - should be replaced by "0.2x".
No Comments
No Comments
No Comments
An excellent and thorough revision. Well done!
It would be preferable to also include the FigWeb URL in citation of the online keys in the main body of the manuscript:
"Multi-entry online keys were produced using Lucid ® v. 3.3 and are available at FigWeb (www.figweb.org) 112 (van Noort & Rasplus 2016) and as supplementary material 3."
All text and materials provided via this peer-review history page are made available under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.